this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2026
249 points (97.0% liked)

News

34240 readers
2936 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] t00l@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

If anyone proves that being physically present does not guarantee being mentally present it is Donald Trump.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

What law was broken? The Trump Doesn't Like It law?

[–] TipsyMcGee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago

Is that not the law of the land?

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 26 points 12 hours ago

Trump is a mentally ill pedophile.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago

Trump used an autopen all the time in his first failure of a presidency.

[–] HarneyToker@lemmy.world 15 points 11 hours ago

A precedent was set in 2005 that stated the president "need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill" and may direct a subordinate to use an autopen, as long as the president has approved and decided to sign it

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 48 points 16 hours ago

Trump is a pedophile.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 17 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

If biden get arrested. Trump would be next

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

The Nazis losing round one doesn’t guarantee they’ll lose round two. I worry they’ve learned from their mistakes while the opposition hasn’t.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

He is only concerned over illegal actions by Democrats, the poors, and brown people. Everyone else gets congratulations.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

It's not an illegal action.

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 4 points 13 hours ago

Heck for a good contribution you get a pardon too. Can even not be white for the right amount. Only people he says one nice thing about are people who've fluffed him up. If you've said no once to him you're on his shit list.

Awesome leader there United States, hah he's a LINO anyways, leader in name only. It's really president Miller, the guy who got into politics cause he's too weak to strangle prostitutes.

[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 6 points 16 hours ago

Made up illegal actions.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 38 points 19 hours ago

...says the guy who doesn't even know what half the people he's pardoned were even in prison for.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 102 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Oh? Does he really want to set a legal precedent that a sitting president can undo the pardons of prior presidents?

Perhaps he's on to something! 🤣

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 72 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Take a moment to consider why he's not concerned about a next president.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 12 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

His attention span isn't that long.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 31 points 19 hours ago (5 children)

The guy's been screaming his intent for years now and y'all are still convinced he doesn't mean it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] WR5@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Hopefully his life span isn't either.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

He doesn't intend for there to be any other sitting presidents after him. At least not before he's dead.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 4 points 17 hours ago

Let's get to that "after"

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

Getting my popcorn

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 123 points 1 day ago (11 children)

I thought the POTUS couldn’t break the law? Or does that go out the window once they’re not sitting? Does Trump really want to set THAT precedent?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 43 points 1 day ago (2 children)

When the president does it, that means that it is not illegal.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I believe Nixon had said that.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Yup. And at that time, we never found out if it was true or not. Since then, Republicans have been tirelessly working to ensure it is. And now we see the fruits of their labor: a Republican president as king.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Often I imagine had Carter elected to move on a Nixon conviction if we would be where we are now. I don’t think we would. Holding power to account doesn’t seem to be an American or Democratic thing to do. When it is, I believe we may have more geopolitical standing in accountability and Democracy. Until we walk the talk we seem to be a cesspool of quacking ducks.

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Jimmy Carter pardoned Nixon because Carter was the bigger person and he believed that forgiveness is the most powerful act one can perform against their attacker.

What Carter forgot was, he's supposed to represent the people who voted for him, and the voters weren't, and didn't care to be, the bigger person; they wanted accountability and didn't place such abstract values on the act of forgiveness.

It was a good personal decision to make, but as a presidential decision, I find it lacking.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 18 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Obviously not retroactive to before Trump!

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 17 points 23 hours ago

Or after... or in-between trump 1 and 2.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

I'm sure the DOJ lawyers will get right on that after they finish burning the remaining epstein files.

[–] bunkyprewster@startrek.website 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Somebody doesn't know how to work the auto pen

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

He's actually auto-penned a bunch of stuff during both presidencies.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

Auto sharpie.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 28 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Don't presidents have immunity?

[–] elvith@feddit.org 49 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Only if it was an official act. To determine whether an act was official is easy, just refer to this chart:

  • Trump: Yes, it was an official act.
  • Someone else: No, it wasn't.
[–] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

Yeah it’s pretty apparent that whoever is in charge gets to decide what’s official and what isn’t. Miller himself even confirmed might makes right.

Trump, the Supreme Court said otherwise regarding the presidency to save your ass, you fucking dipshit.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 25 points 23 hours ago

One month past the Epstein files release date. Still finding media disctractions.

white house breaks the law daily... can we get some arrests there?

[–] Critical_Drinking@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Autopen his ass. Sue every still living president and their staff then. This guy is an imbecile.

[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago

Everything is a distraction from the Epstein files. Tomorrow it will be some other absurd BS. He wants us to be outraged about this, and forget about that. And it’s working. It’s been working and will continue to because we cannot focus on one thing for more than 2 weeks.

[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Look at this other crazy shit he said, not the plundering of the nation and trampling of civic rights...

I really wish there was an easy way his daily rants could just be tagged into boxes of actual threats vs his standard blustering bullshit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›