Yeah, fish in the sea are definitely wet. As is a swimmer under the water
otp
The water on the other water makes the other water wet, and vice versa
Coming at it from a colloquial definition and not a chemist's definition, though. And I prefer the colloquial definition of "wet".
laws
Damages
guilty
morally convict
crime
...lol
What are you going on about?
The reason I kept showing you the same comment is because you said things like "I'm deeply confused" and asking me what I'm saying.
I'm not even arguing with you. But you seem to be putting a lot of effort into reading an argument into what I'm saying. Is this how you enjoy spending your time on social media? Lol
Why do you keep using words like "accuse" and "guilty"? Lol
Nintendo benefitted financially from piracy and made no efforts to hide the fact that they obtained games through the exact same methods that pirates use.
This is what I'm saying. I'm not even sure why you seem to be trying to make this a fight or an argument or something. "Tire you out"? Lol
"But I haven't seen you in over a decade!"
I said, SAME. OLD!
I’m asking you to clearly formulate what it is that you’re accusing Nintendo of.
For the third time...
Nintendo benefitted financially from piracy and made no efforts to hide the fact that they obtained games through the exact same methods that pirates use.
Which part is unclear to you? Lol
Source, in case you're unfamiliar with this funny thing they did
What are you confused about?
I don't understand what your angle is. It feels like you're really trying to win an argument, except you seem to be the only one arguing.
I've been trying to sort out a misunderstanding, and it looks like you're trying to win something. The misunderstanding is sorted out. So, I guess you win, too?
I couldn't be bothered cooking after walking from school x3
Unfortunately, I use some software that's Windows-only, and can't be bothered to set up a VM or anything
No, I've understood this whole time that you're saying "Nintendo is legally allowed to do this with their own games".
What I'm saying is "Nintendo benefitted from their game having been pirated because they downloaded and sold the exact version of the game that someone illegally pirated".
Nintendo didn't do anything illegal. Someone did something illegal, and Nintendo saved time and effort (and therefore money too) because of the illegal thing that someone did.
Why do you multiply the last word of your comments by three?
The games don't drop in price, but the consoles do. There's even a chance the price could go down for the holiday season, even if it's something miniscule. This launch price is the early adopter tax.