this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
297 points (98.4% liked)

World News

51924 readers
2138 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 3 points 23 minutes ago (1 children)

I don't understand why the danish officials they even wasted their time to go to Washington to "talk" about this. There's nothing to talk about this.

Have they ever tried to reason with a toddler that's having a tantrum "I want that toy now"? Waste of time.

[–] arendjr@programming.dev 2 points 19 minutes ago (1 children)

Simple: if the toddler has found daddy’s gun because the safe was left open… you better try talking before you scare it.

[–] EvilCartyen@feddit.dk 1 points 10 minutes ago

This is not a toddler, this is a guy bigger than you and with lots of guns and friends. Talking is our only option, especially because it means we can also go against the narrative that Denmark cannot defend Greenland.

Which is true in isolation, but that's why we're in NATO and the joint arctic command and have the 1951 deal with the US that you guys can scale up military presence in Greenland at will. Yet it hadn't happened in 20 years, only reductions.

Personally I think we should have gone more into how Biden refused to increase the defense of the arctic region within the agreement, give the trumpists a way to call him names and solve the issue within the agreements we have.

Still, Lars Løkke has been doing the rounds on Fox News and elsewhere to give our perspective, which could influence public opinion and help change the false narratives being spread in the US. From our perspective we had everything to gain from a meeting and very little to lose.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 32 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

I really want to stress how deeply unpopular this is in the U.S. The MAGA movement is about 30% of the electorate, so you can generally expect that even the dumbest, most insane Trump decisions have a floor of 30% approval. 9% of Americans support this, 86% oppose it. At minimum, two-thirds of Trump's most rabid, loyal followers are against this.

[–] Threeskittiesinatrenchcoat@lemmy.ca 7 points 41 minutes ago

Something I’ve learned in the last decade, no matter how unpopular a position, MAGA supporters will fall in line with the party rather than risk threatening the parties authority.

[–] Mvlad88@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

As long as that idiot is in power those numbers mean nothing. Impeach him, wrote in a new guy and then we'll talk.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 hour ago

I hope those numbers can be turned into actions to stop Trump.

The elected officials need to be reminded what the vast majority of their voters want them to do.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks. They're comforting numbers.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Well, I hate to throw cold water on that comfort, but I'm not sure the numbers matter. Trump is increasingly unresponsive to polling, even within his base, and it seems like the Pentagon really is planning an invasion. It would fracture his own MAGA movement, completely destroy NATO, make America a global pariah, and potentially start WWIII, but it seems he is seriously considering it.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Ah I'm sure he's considering it and the planning is a given. I'm glad the bulk of Americans have some sense in this matter at least.

[–] Cybersteel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Probably as retribution to the American people for not voting for him in 2021. Such a lust for revenge

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago

Trump is unacceptable. Someone please put the kibbosh on everything about him.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 11 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't know what kind of authority Greenland / Denmark would have to expel all US personnel from Greenland, but given there are US military bases there, I imagine there might be some contractual issues.

As an alternative, at this point, I think they should be blockading those bases, and searching any vehicle going into or out of it for supply reasons. Also institute a no fly zone over their base so they can't just air drop stuff in.

No net new personnel going into the base (staffing swaps maybe... like 1 in 1 out). No new weapons allowed.

If Trump was going to try something, you don't want them being able to prep those bases to assist with the assult any more than they already can, and you want them locked down with defences in their pathway before anything starts.

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know what kind of authority Greenland / Denmark would have to expel all US personnel from Greenland, but given there are US military bases there, I imagine there might be some contractual issues.

Ask Cuba how that went.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Cuba was a stones throw away, and didn't have the military capabilities of Denmark.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

They also agreed to lease it for an absurd length of time.

Denmark has no such obligations.

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I have a feeling trump is willing to call the “Denmark will put boots on the ground to forcibly expel/kill the invaders” (what I unfortunately suspect would be a) bluff.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

He knows the Europeans will put up a token, face-saving resistance but have no enthusiasm for a full-on shooting war. Unfortunately this may be a correct assessment. But Europe and its allies still have the power to disrupt the US economy, and should seriously plan to do so if the US doesn't back off.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Bluff or not, I believe you are correct.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 48 points 11 hours ago (7 children)

Wonder if conservatives knew they were voting to destroy all America's allegiances. Or if their brains were incapable of thinking that far ahead.

I'm gonna go with option 2.

[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 1 points 6 minutes ago

I honestly believe they didn't think that trump was actually going to go through with a lot of it, and that 'he talks a lot of shit, and triggers the libs' and that's it.

I think they just wanted four more years of Trump term 1 which was retarded but certainly not this horiffic.

There is still a wildly vocal support base online so it's hard to hear the voters who have silently realised their mistake.

And yes it has cost allegiance, that won't come back as easily this time.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 1 points 27 minutes ago

Things I'm seeing online are like ... "he does what he says/he keeps his promises" "better for the economy" ... fucked that none of those make sense and you'd have to be an idiot to believe

So many believe in the whole American exceptionalism shit so I think they believe some of their shit is their birthright or something.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 18 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Have you talked to a Republican or MAGA?

They cheer on destroying relations with Europe.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 59 minutes ago

Have you talked to a Republican or MAGA?

They cheer on destroying relations with Europe.

They have been convinced that the entire world is somehow abusing the poor widdle usa.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 23 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
  1. they don't know what that word means
  2. they don't care what that word means
  3. they think america doesn't need anybody but america
  4. fuck anybody that is not america
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They also seem to think "fuck at least 2/3 of America".

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago

They don't consider those people "America".

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 hours ago

Most Trump supporters probably can't even name more than 10 non-english speaking countries that aren't Mexico, Russia or China, and one their answers would probably be "Africa".

International politics doesn't even come close to their thought processes during election time.

[–] Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 10 hours ago

I mean, they still cant grasp that or what it means.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 hours ago

Most stopped processing after "make America great again". They really were thinking shit would just magically get great without any care as to the how and for who

[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago

"Pro-Peace Ticket" BTW.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 84 points 14 hours ago (14 children)

Change my mind: Literally zero people want Greenland to be part of the US except Donald Trump and the people who have trained themselves to always agree with Donald Trump.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago

They don't even have a fucking reason. Oh, it is an important strategic location? Good thing we already have a base there!

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 31 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The people who have trained Donald Trump to agree with them. They want oil, minerals, land, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 26 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

A large percentage of the world finds Donald Trump being president of the USA unacceptable.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

A large percentage of the US as well.

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 8 points 8 hours ago

Not large enough.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Apart from all the deflection and Putin and Gilded-Age foreign policy policy theories, which may well be right, I think President Dingleberry also found out that Greenland is 1% larger by area than the Louisiana Purchase, which would make him the president that most embiggened America. How can you you deny MAGA if he literally made it greater (in size) than any president prior to him?

It's also possible he has only ever looked at a Mercator and thinks Greenland is literally the size of Africa or South America.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Ugh mercator getting us all in trouble again

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thecaptaintrout@lemmy.zip 68 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Ffs. . . Putin is giggling in glee at the payoff from his agent in the White House, and all the time/effort spent on troll farms and blackmail.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 33 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

The only reason Trump is doing this is to get the USA out of NATO for Putin. The reason he works for Putin is because Putin has some very compromising pictures and videos of Trump, involving children and possibly pee

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›