this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
378 points (98.5% liked)

World News

51924 readers
2395 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't know what kind of authority Greenland / Denmark would have to expel all US personnel from Greenland, but given there are US military bases there, I imagine there might be some contractual issues.

As an alternative, at this point, I think they should be blockading those bases, and searching any vehicle going into or out of it for supply reasons. Also institute a no fly zone over their base so they can't just air drop stuff in.

No net new personnel going into the base (staffing swaps maybe... like 1 in 1 out). No new weapons allowed.

If Trump was going to try something, you don't want them being able to prep those bases to assist with the assult any more than they already can, and you want them locked down with defences in their pathway before anything starts.

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 13 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know what kind of authority Greenland / Denmark would have to expel all US personnel from Greenland, but given there are US military bases there, I imagine there might be some contractual issues.

Ask Cuba how that went.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Cuba was a stones throw away, and didn't have the military capabilities of Denmark.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

They also agreed to lease it for an absurd length of time.

Denmark has no such obligations.

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I have a feeling trump is willing to call the “Denmark will put boots on the ground to forcibly expel/kill the invaders” (what I unfortunately suspect would be a) bluff.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

He knows the Europeans will put up a token, face-saving resistance but have no enthusiasm for a full-on shooting war. Unfortunately this may be a correct assessment. But Europe and its allies still have the power to disrupt the US economy, and should seriously plan to do so if the US doesn't back off.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Bluff or not, I believe you are correct.