azertyfun

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So... Cotton/Linen/Wool? The technology is fine, its only downside in most applications is simply cost. Cotton clothes are more comfortable, less stinky, less polluting, and won't fuse with your skin and disfigure you for life if they accidentally catch on fire. On top of not making microplastics soup every wash cycle.

If we cared to actually solve the problem of plastics in fast fashion we could ban them, with some exceptions for sportswear and shoes where synthetics have some actually useful uses. Hell, we could even make it an easy transition by gradually pulling back the allowable synthetic content for x years.

But it would directly kneecap Shein and H&M's business model so we have to weigh all the pros against that.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Comparing US statistics to Dutch ones makes no sense. Their roads are several times more deadly than European ones regardless of vehicle.

Furthermore not all of their states have mandatory helmets (!) whereas over here it's rare to see someone missing something other than pants. Except scooters, scooter riders are under the impression that they don't ride a motorcycle and that flip-flops are appropriate apparel.

Then there's a lot you can do as a motorcyclist to mitigate risk. Riding safely is one (not everyone seems capable of that, there's quite a spread in riding behaviors, but also an obvious bias in which ones you'll remember seeing on your commute). A strict no-alcohol policy is another, and not riding at night on weekends. You can also wear extra safety gear such as a high-vis airbag.

Also licensing requirements. Oh and American motorcycles don't have to be equipped with ABS. They be crazy over there.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 days ago

All three of your examples were known to cause ill effects for centuries. The ancient Romans knew the asbestos mines were killing their slaves. Their overuse during the 20th century was not due to ignorance but corporate lobbying and political complacency.

The lobbyist play is to fund counter-studies to sow FUD even though the scientific consensus that [X Bad] is well established, because it gives an easy out for bought out politicians. However the tatoo lobby is certainly not one that I expect to be have the pull to fund FUD scientific studies to delay legislation, and if they are doing that it should be pretty easy to point to.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago

On top of the other point.

Capitalism is uninterested in your healthcare policy. That's your country's failure, not capitalism's, for once. Market pressures did not invent a gaggle of middle men siphoning the money between patients and care providers. That's a result of government failures that ossified into a corrupt system benefiting a select few, a scheme which is not unique to capitalism and is actually reminding me of soviet bureaucracy.

The distinction is not purely academic, because correctly pointing out that you're not fighting capitalism but corrupt bureaucracy makes reform a much easier sell, which is why healthcare reform is a transpartisan issue until donors and lobbyists get involved.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Altman secretly secured 40 % of the world's DRAM manufacturing capacity last month. Supposedly Samsung and HK Hynix weren't aware they were both signing up for it.

That alone would be enough to call collusion if it wasn't an obvious play to strangle his competition by literally choking them out of hardware.

https://www.mooreslawisdead.com/post/sam-altman-s-dirty-dram-deal

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 60 points 1 week ago (5 children)

In my local experience, these are actually just profoundly incompetent. Hanlon's razor.

They tailgate because they are actually incapable of maintaining a following distance (you know the kind, when the road is empty they alternate between mashing the gas and driving well under the speed limit, and somehow if you're a passenger they're totally unaware that they are doing it even if they are not distracted, how it is possible to be this bad at gauging speed and distance I do not understand but these people do exist).

Then as their malfunctioning brain randomly processes that they want to go faster, they overtake, and since the lane is clear they mash the gas.

Then when they are done and they merge back, their brain performs a hard reset and they somehow drive slower than before they passed you. They do not notice. You pass them, and they are not looking distracted; the only explanation is that their brain is doing the simpsons-monkey-cymbals.gif.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)
  1. Buy more dishes so you can go longer between washes
  2. Buy a half-height dishwasher. They exist, I owned one that lived on the floor of my bathroom.

I live alone and I fill up my full size dishwashers every few days. If you don't eat ordered/preprocessed food you can also just chuck pots and pans in the bottom rack.

Dishwashers use a lot less water than hand-washing. Even if there's a little bit of room left, it's still a net positive. There's no reason for anyone to hand-wash unless they live in a tiny NYC broom closet or exclusively eat take-out in disposable containers.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The punishment must fit the crime. Minimum sentence in Canada for a DUI is apparently 1000 rupees and 12 months driving prohibition. That punishment makes sense for the crime of negligently operating heavy machinery that can and does kill thousands every year. Not for operating light low-power electric vehicles where killing a third-party is only a remote (though real) possibility. That minimum sentence being applied equally is not just when the danger posed to society is so unequal. I would also expect a truck driver to have a higher minimum sentence for the same reasons.

On top of the justice concerns, if the punishment is the same for everyone, a drunk college dickhead who would have ridden a bicycle home (still a reprehensible crime mind you) might decide to drive their car instead if they feel like they're less likely to get caught and it would be punished the same anyway. Especially as cases like this get media attention.

That's the pitfall with blind and strict rules, if I know I'll be getting expelled from school for getting punched by a bully, then I'm incentivized to cave their face in before the grown-ups get here.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

I agree with all you said but it's still a (bad) abstraction.

By and large, the original market for VBScript or Cobol were people who did not have the means to understand - nevermind debug - their own output. Then actual professionals were hired to fix their broken pile of shit.

Vibe coding is arguably worse in many areas (such as determinism), but I'd argue it's a difference of degree not nature. The idea and target audience are largely the same, and the results will be as well, which is why I am not worried for my job security, quite the contrary.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago (10 children)

you’re at risk of becoming dependent, and not building the understanding you’ll need to make something that matters

Could be – and has been – said about literally any abstraction. Some people still haven't gotten over the fact that assembly is not the default system programming language anymore.

For me vibe coding is more akin to vbscript or MS Access. It's for people who neither know nor care about the "how" and don't give a shit about quality, performance, security, or maintainability (i.e. people who have no interest in software development). It's a market that's looked down upon for many good reasons, but it does exist and it does serve a purpose for small-scale and low-stakes DIY automation. Unfortunately that purpose is a lot narrower than the marketing pitch, nevermind all the other deleterious problems with the AI industry as it exists today.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

With this and other projects like Hyprland I do wonder what the right thing to do is. Like, the project would probably be better served if the governance was not dickheads. But they make decent products for free. The community could fork with a better governance model and just continuously merge the work from the "problematic" people involved, but that seems like a lot of work for very little gain.

At the same time I would not want to get very involved with community development efforts led by people who do not share my core values, and I'm probably not alone, so we're probably missing out on opportunities by keeping the status quo.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So happy to see the game is not dead.

Combat and movement look fun and satisfying, graphics look amazing. So many moody areas, from gritty snowscape to colorful caves. Mojang could learn a thing or five from this trailer.

I do hope there will be more breadth of gameplay especially on the creative side so those promising exploration mechanics do not feel stale after a few hours of running around and blasting skeletons. That's one thing mojang does get right, if anything they have too much breadth and not enough depth.

Not sure about the ease of movement when scaling multiple blocks. Figuring it how to get from point A to point B with the limited movement options is a core part of most Minecraft gameplay loops, especially when caving and/or fighting. Seems they made up for it with good fighting mechanics, but they will have to make up for it in the other gameplay loops as well.

Either way I wish them the best and hope they light a fucking fire underneath mojang's ass.

EDIT:

This is the original legacy engine from the 2018 trailer, running on a four-year-old build as we push Hytale forward again.

Now hold the fuck up. What do you mean this is the 2018 engine? What the fuck have they been doing the past 7 years? Did they rewrite a whole new engine for no good reason? It looks fucking beautiful and seems to run great! I'm sure they had their reasons, and I don't think we can draw accurate conclusions by speculating, but the insider perspective on the development cycle must be absolutely wild.

EDIT2: Okay their blog post explains quite a bit more. Seems to paint a picture that Riot wanted the engine to be cross-platform (makes sense for consoles) and they could not make it work with a full rewrite away from their otherwise functional Java/C# engine. Kind of a crazy play on Riot's part to make Java/C# devs and former minecraft modders write a modern game engine from scratch in C++ if that's the case. Probably a tough lesson to learn for everyone involved. If only they could learn from an incredibly popular voxel-based building/aventure game that went through the exact same engine rewrite away from a GC VM language and faced similar struggles.

As a PC player, great news that they're sticking to .NET and Java. It will make modding much easier.

view more: next ›