this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
356 points (99.2% liked)

News

36354 readers
2673 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Notice how they're trying to smear the victim, not bring the perpetrator to justice

They're doing it because murdering wine moms is the MAGA wet dream

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 147 points 1 month ago (4 children)

What exactly does that have anything to do with murdering her? I don’t care if she was the president of Antifa, Tren de Aragua division, what they did to this woman was a straight up hit. Douchebag wanted to shoot someone so he did.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 64 points 1 month ago

Right? Police executing criminals is bad, too. This is some weird, authoritarian, Judge Dredd fantasy.

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 7 points 1 month ago

What exactly does that have anything to do with murdering her?

The public is brainwashed to hate and consider less anything that gets labelled by authorities as negative

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago

I think it was more than wanting to shoot her, I think he had orders to do it.

In her disingenuous rationalization speech, Puppy Killer went into detail about how often cars were being used to block ICE, and it was clearly frustrating. This strategy was working, and they were pissed about it, and wanted the practice to end.

So they were ordered to watch for a vehicle blocking situation, and deal with it decisively, and send a message. As usual for the virtuosically incompetent MAGA, they fucked it up, and instead of the public being intimidated by the action, it inflamed them far beyond where they already were.

So who conceived this plan, and who gave the orders? How far up does this go? Noem? PeeWee Himmler? Trump? Somebody ordered a violent attack on an American citizen who was only exercising their 1st Amendment Rights, and we need to know exactly who that person is, and charge them with murder.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

What exactly does that have anything to do with murdering her?

Because they're going to get away with it. This is how they've chosen to do that.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 101 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Examining the murderer's activist ties would undoubtedly be more fruitful.

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh, are we calling the Proud Boys and KKK "activist groups" now?

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago

I believe the term is domestic terror organization.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago

He is hardcore maga, I think some questionable group memberships too.bb

[–] 20cello@lemmy.world 54 points 1 month ago (4 children)
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 42 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You're entertaining a bullshit narrative.

But even if she had been one, and even if it was a crime, that's still no reason to shoot that person dead. And even if it was, how could he have known that already in the moment?

[–] 20cello@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Totally agree with you

[–] hayvan@piefed.world 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You are drawing the line too far back. That investigation is irrelevant. Even if activism was a crime, even if she was an al-Qaeda member or something, it's not job of ICE to kill people. Besides, investigating if someone is a criminal after the "punishment" isn't how justice works. These are both signs of brutal fascism.

[–] 20cello@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago
[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

welcome to the end-game of a police state

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 42 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Why don’t we dig into ICE’s affiliations with Neo Nazi groups instead?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 1 month ago

They're already associated with MAGA, it doesn't get much worse than that.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It’s not all public yet though

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah it should be done but I don't see it changing things. "Proud boys, stand back and standby" during a presidential debate, and people were like "that's great, I'm gonna vote for him." If the actual American Nazi Party endorsed him or, hell, went to dinner at the WH, they'd just do some mental backflips and call it a good thing. America is fucked.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can't the press get info on ICE agents via FOIA request? If they have info I expect an investigation would be easy. I don't imagine these people are very quiet, or have a subdued online footprint.

[–] derfunkatron@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Your heart is in the right place, I think, but FOIA is useless here. FOIA is cool if you want to know what an agency has on file about you (which is usually nothing) or learning the “truth” about JFK, EBEs, and UAPs.

Sarcasm aside, the most important thing to note about FOIA is that agencies handle their own FOIA requests; each agency has a staff (sometimes even a staff of one) for processing FOIA requests. FOIA is also a “devil’s in the details” type of law: you won’t have much luck with vague, open-ended, or ambiguously scoped requests.

Some information and data are exempt FOIA requests, including information about law enforcement activities or investigations, the personnel files or personal details of staff, and anything considered relevant to “national security.”

Even if the information requested is cleared for release, agencies know how to stall. FOIA requests are legally required to be responded to in 20 days or less… unless “the information needs to be closely reviewed and redacted before release,” “we’ve received too many requests for the same information to answer them in a timely manner,” or “our staff are experiencing difficulty locating the specific files that would satisfy the request.” Flooding an agency with FOIA requests for the same document or topic typically makes things worse until the amount requests becomes so high that that agency just dumps them online somewhere.

The last thing I’ll say is that a lot of FOIA requests only get satisfied after a lawsuit.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 month ago

Because the trump FBI regards those as the 'good groups' .

[–] HisArmsOpen@crust.piefed.social 41 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Renee Good's murder is a double crisis for Trump. Expect this to lead to even more extreme facist / dictatorship actions

  1. It draws attention to white America that they also have no rights protecting them from ICE.
  2. Impact upon Electoral swings.

Tactically, Trumps team will need to take the final step and make the US North Korea, or Renee Good will be remembered forever as turning point for America at the brink. The woman who spoke calmly to her murderer.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This comment reads like a bot pushing for people to wait hopeful for midterms.

We need to ditch this idea, we're dead by midterms, so take aggressive action today.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 1 month ago

Lemmy is full of trolls pushing for violence. That's a weapon that may need to be deployed on the future, but we still have some legal steps to take, including the Midterm Elections I'm November.

If they allow them to happen, then we vote, and take it from there. It is likely to be a bloodbath win for the Dems, and then MAGA will have to turn over power, something they don't do so well, historically, so that will be an important moment.

I'm fact, the Midterm is looking so bad for MAGA, that they've had a record number of MAGA Congressional Reps retire because they are reading the writing on the wall, and don't want to be around when deserved justice starts.

They've also had a number of resignations, like MTG, one guy suddenly croaked, and another geezer got in a bad car accident, so the MAGA vote lead in the House is only a couple of seats. If they lose any more, the House majority may flip BEFORE we get to the Midterms, and it won't matter if Trump suspends the election.

But if he does suspend elections, THEN it's on. America has never suspended an election, not even during the Civil War or WW2. That is a BRIGHT RED LINE that must not be crossed. If he does that, it is the OFFICIAL end of American Democracy, and we owe no loyalty or obedience to the abomination that is MAGA America.

But until then, we do it legally, until all those options have been exhausted.

[–] HisArmsOpen@crust.piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago

Sadly, just a frustrated individual trying to see which way the ralad will go. Hopefully, I'm wrong. That said, we must remember Renee and all others

[–] boogiebored@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

Oh yeah they killed her because in that moment he knew she was actually really bad.

Entirely irrelevant classic infowar propaganda bullshit for more twitter shitlord talking points.

Let me guess, did the bullet not kill her, but the fentanyl did? Was the fentanyl driving the car?

[–] rayyy@piefed.social 29 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Does this open the door for the American gestapo to execute people based on association with "unapproved" people or groups?

[–] hector@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago

Cancelling nationwide injunctions in effect does let them do anything without check, for months or ever. Disappearing citizens without warrant, that is where they are trying to go.

Or just have some hanging judges to sign everything, stuff them in camps in practical secrecy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

Hey, FEEBS! I'm an activist. come get me brodawg.

I'm at your mom's house. She's really upset with you.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They’re doing it because murdering wine moms is the MAGA wet dream

Well if you can't make them your mother-wives what else are you supposed to do? View them as autonomous individuals?

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

and when they don't find anything, they'll make something up.

[–] Aneb@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They'll make something up or plant something fake, RIP to Luigi for that cop planting a firearm in his bag after she got back to the station

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They'll just say she's ANTIFA and keep to the terrorist narrative.

There's nothing for them to prove about ANTIFA so they'll just be able to keep lying about it because anything is ANTIFA.

It's going to be their answer for everything.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 16 points 1 month ago

Doesn't matter what groups she was involved in. Being a member of those organizations wouldn't make it okay to shoot her. You have video of the event from multiple angles, including the shooter's POV. You can see she wasn't doing anything that warranted shooting her. Stop wasting our tax dollars on theatrics.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 15 points 1 month ago

Abolish the FBI. Abolish ICE. Smash the state. We need mob justice.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If you believe the exit polls, they very much do not want to murder wine moms. While more women voted for Harris than Trump, more white women voted for Trump than Harris. They just shot a white lady in broad daylight. Of the 53% that may have voted for Trump and have seen that video, I imagine a significant amount will think about their choices the next time they see their own glove compartment overflowing with stuffed animals and imagine what it might look like spattered in the blood of a parent to a newly motherless child.

I think the administration understands that and is resorting to damage control after flat denial didn't work. That's why the rhetoric is focused so hard on painting her as some kind of outlier. They just realized it could cost them the midterms and subsequently, impeachment or worse.

It's become cliche with non-MAGAs, but we knew it was never going to stop with arresting Hispanic and Latino people, not that it would have been acceptable. It never stops with just one little infringement on the human rights of just one group. It'll be the communists, then the socialists, then the trade unionists then Jewish people, then Catholic people, etc. as the poem goes.

But now, they've let the mask slip a little early. They've demonstrated to millions of voters who thought they were too privileged to be affected that those privileges no longer apply. I wish it were empathy and ethics that were going to change conservative minds, but self-preservation at least works in the short term.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If she was straight, maybe. I'm unfortunately not so sure they'll care about open season on lesbians.

If they get pummeled in the midterms it'll be due to the economy, not the murders.

[–] cybernihongo@reddthat.com 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Only if there are free and fair midterms. If they're not canceled, they'll be neither free nor fair. I live in a country where an authoritarian regime was voted in. Do you know what happened next? None of the elections were canceled, but all of them stopped mattering, they became circus shows that people only attend by force or to receive a not even that good reward for it. MAGA knows you want to pull them out of power and they've got the means to ensure their rule continues.

I wish Americans would just STOP waiting for the ballot box to right the wrongs. The time to do something is now.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I hope you're wrong. There's no way that officer knew her name at that point, much less her orientation. He was fully willing to, even if unknowingly, kill a heterosexual, Anglo-Saxon, Evangelical, stay-at-home mom as long as she was anything but politically right of center. Again, none of that demography should matter, but for those to whom is does, I hope they have or develop the common sense to know that this means they are and have been on the menu for quite some time now.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I hope I'm wrong too, but don't underestimate the hoops people are willing to jump through to continue defining themselves as the in-group and every victim as the out-group.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Her wife was right there, so he could in fact likely know her orientation.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There's no way that officer knew her name at that point, much less her orientation

Are they not using Palantir bullshit and stingrays and flock cameras and everything? I can think of several ways...

Not only that, but the wife was outside of the car filming and maybe said/did things prior to the footage to indicate they were together.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

Damage control? They made executing her a cause celebre. They are rallying around executing a citizen for insolance to fed officials.

[–] 1984@piefed.world 6 points 1 month ago

I’m coming for you America…

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 4 points 1 month ago

Douche has a sixth sense for terrorists, so he acted on it.

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Instead of investing the murder and the murderer, they're investigating the victim and trying really hard to fabricate some bullshit story why she deserved to be shot dead in the face.

Americunt law and justice at its best.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago
load more comments
view more: next ›