this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
362 points (90.2% liked)

Science Memes

19574 readers
1322 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 79 points 2 months ago (4 children)

You can say "fuck" on the Internet πŸ™„

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 37 points 2 months ago

That's fvcked up, man

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Romans used the letter V to transcribe the sound U, then they changed that during the renaissanceand now we have both V and U.
The title is a joke about that

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I am referring to the picture.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 3 points 2 months ago

Oh yeah, right

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So where did the "v" sound come from?

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The sound V was already present, they used the letter V with both sounds (if i am not wrong), idk where it came from

[–] Klear@quokk.au 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You can, but Romans couldn't.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well, now I don't want to.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 5 points 2 months ago

Well... fuck.

[–] kubofhromoslav@lemmy.world 59 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Modern engineer would built an aquaduct in kilometers, not miles πŸ˜…

[–] Lembot_0006@programming.dev 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Roman engineers most probably never heard about miles too.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

millia pasuum, literally "1,000 paces," was a common unit of measure in the empire, and the basis of various modern miles. It was slightly shorter than the modern statute mile.

[–] Klear@quokk.au 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Interesting. Never realised that "mile" just means "thousand" (though it is kinda obvious in retrospect). And since the modern mile is 1760 yards, a kilometre is more of a mile than the actual mile.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, assuming that a yard is meant to approximate the stride of an adult human, who's the Goliath-sized motherfucker with the 5' 3" stride who took a thousand steps and called that a mile?

Edit: Okay, I checked.

The furlong (meaning furrow length) was the distance a team of oxen could plough without resting. This was standardised to be exactly 40 rods or 10 chains.

An English mile is defined as 8 furlongs, 8 presumably being chosen because it divides by 2 and 4. What a cockamamie system of measurement.

Edit Again: Okay, I checked again.

The modern English word mile derives from Middle English myle and Old English mΔ«l, which was cognate with all other Germanic terms for miles. These derived from the nominal ellipsis form of mΔ«lle passus 'mile' or mΔ«lia passuum 'miles', the Roman mile of one thousand paces.

A pace is a unit of length consisting either of one normal walking step, or of a double step, returning to the same foot.

This is all still very silly.

[–] Ruthalas@infosec.pub 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Far be it from me to defend the imperial system- I love and daily work in metric, but you realize nearly all ancient measurement systems are created around commonplace physical measures (body parts, strides, etc.) and simple multiples thereof to make their use easy, yeah?

We've got a lot of tools at our disposal now to both standardize and make working with a decimal system a lot more doable than before.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Unless they're american, then it'll be built in freedom units.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Will be built in cheeseburgers and carrying stolen oil.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 7 points 2 months ago

Interesting (scribbles on clipboard)...and for how many football fields would it span, exactly? And weigh how many Ford F150s?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

there's a difference.

their engineering was amazing, but to compensate for lack of modern maths, they build with a much larger margin of safety and strength.

that's why some of those aqueducts last 2000 years.

no one wants to build infrastructure that lasts so long. we could build a bridge designed to last thousands of years, but it'll cost way way more, and the budget isn't unlimited.

[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And even if we could, Autocad crashed again so I can't

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

just use msPaint, more reliable

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ellvix@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I like the way someone described a similar retort:

Anyone can build a bridge that stays up and lasts a long time, but it takes a skilled engineer to build a bridge that just barely stays up a long time and minimizes costs and materials.

100% not a joke, that is the point.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 15 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Also our bridges are subjected to the insane forces of truck freight transportation. Who know how long they would last otherwise.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (3 children)

They were designed for that (usually), if you want a bridge to last multiple millenia you can design it for that. but it will probably add a couple zeroes at the end of the bill.

Romans had the 'advantage' of slave labour,

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

like musical instruments, bridges are meant to be stressed. gotta drive over em with trucks or they'll shoot off into space

[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

It's also worth pointing out those structures aren't subjected to a lot of freeze thaw cycles, not to mention almost no salt.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

but it'll cost way way more, and the budget isn't unlimited.

I wish things weren't always so short-sighted by default. I mean sometimes things evolve so maybe it's better to leave room for teardown and improvement or whatnot.

But it seems if you're not thinking in "quarterlies", infrastructure that's built once and simply maintained should cost a lot less in the long run.

But then I guess the contractors would dry up if they didn't have to come rebuild it a dozen times a decade. :p

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yhea, it is better to build infrastructure that lasts, but 2000 years?

that is a bit overkill, and more of a vanity project for billionaires which is more of a cry for help (by help I mean guillotine)

[–] autriyo@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I feel, for the hard to replace stuff an interstate bridge in a dense city for example, aiming for a three digit life span should be considered.

Just because it kinda sucks having to replace infrastructure like that. And the city is most likely still going to be there and need that infrastructure.

Golden gate is almost 90, empire State building also approaching a 100,

I think we can do that.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 27 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Stop censoring mens, please?

I think we should just bad images with censored parts unless the censored part is the point.

Yeah, this is the internet, you can say bad words and fuck these US tech companies that want to stop everyone saying naughty words only because it makes them more money when we don't

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 5 points 2 months ago

It's an instant downvote for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Their tools still used calculus, just indirectly and without their understanding.

Importantly, I replace dy/dx with βˆ†y/βˆ†x when I need a really quick sanity check for simple calculations.

[–] Gust@piefed.social 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Calculus tells you how curves work. Aqueducts are famous for their ability to be topologically flat. The math checks out

[–] TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Flat on top. They tend to be quite curvy underneath, on account of all the arches.

[–] Gust@piefed.social 5 points 2 months ago

Well yeah. I said they were topologically flat, not bottomologically flat ;)

[–] KTJ_microbes@mander.xyz 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yup, we're stupid, but at least we have the metric system Β―_(ツ)_/Β―

[–] chellomere@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Water go downhill, what more do you need to know?

[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Back then you used to have to have a college degree to be able to multiply.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί