LibertyLizard

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Yeah you’ll get one board member, maybe, if they feel like it. The steps needed even just to reform capitalism to eliminate gender inequality are considered way too radical by neoliberals.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Defederation needs to be considered, honestly. I don’t want to be separated from their userbase but the extreme level of censorship is just toxic at this point.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

That only happened because half the world united to put and end to the Nazi madness and completely destroyed any bargaining power they had.

I don’t see that happening here. Best case scenario they are so thoroughly humiliated and discredited that they quietly creep off into the sunset. But I’m not sure I see that happening either, honestly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

There’s gotta be at least one somewhere… but none come to mind.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

How come my melon doesn’t do this? Evolution giving me the short stick yet again.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Credit to Tim Buckley for briefly becoming one of the most widely mocked people on the internet and spawning a meme that lives on to this day but just rolling with it and continuing with his dream of making webcomics.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

This is going a bit off topic but you obviously haven’t looked very much at the bannings on ML if you think this is in any way comparable.

A frank discussion of certain facts around China or its leadership is automatically labeled “sinophobia” on .ml, and immediately results in an instance-wide banned. I was banned for referring to historical China (before the revolution even) as an empire. Explain how that’s sinophobic if you think it is.

You called people racist idiots and Nazis for supporting certain politicians. That goes beyond just stating the facts.

I personally don’t usually support bannings and think comment removal is a better option in most cases. But if you got banned for calling most Russians racist idiots and Nazis then I don’t think that would be too problematic.

China would be a better comparison though since they are materially supporting mass-murder but not directly doing it (at least not outside their borders). Russia is more akin to Israel in this example.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

This validates my preexisting opinion that the internet is full of misinformation, therefore I will upvote it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago

Even before Trump, the number of executions and forced labor in the US is much higher than most countries. I’m curious how they weigh these facts.

I personally consider solitary confinement to be torture as well but I understand that understanding is not widespread so I’m not surprised they wouldn’t count it as such.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Turns out Trump can make any world leader look good.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago

I keep shorting this instance but y'all keep hitting it out of the park. I'm ruined!

[–] [email protected] 20 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (5 children)

I’d say BPR. I think you’re largely correct on the facts but you need to be able to express them without insulting a large portion of the community you’re in, or you can expect to be banned. I understand you probably think this is a uniquely horrible circumstance that rises above such ideas of decorum but that’s obviously not how people who disagree with you will see it.

So, I’d advise you to think harder before commenting because you’ll be a lot more effective in getting the facts out there if you do.

 

Trees > Parking Spots

Good to see cities in America putting in the work to fix the poor decisions of the past! Yes, this is a small step but I think it will have big impacts. Especially because my city never wants to do anything that no American city has done before, even if it's common practice in other parts of the world. Now that Portland has led the way, we might see other cities following suit.

 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/35583702

Whether the move will boost lumber supplies as Trump envisioned in an executive order last month remains to be seen. Former President Joe Biden’s administration also sought more logging in public forests to combat fires, which are worsening as the world gets hotter, yet U.S. Forest Service timber sales stayed relatively flat under his tenure.

It exempts affected forests from an objection process that allows outside groups, tribes and local governments to challenge logging proposals at the administrative level before they are finalized. It also narrows the number of alternatives federal officials can consider when weighing logging projects.

 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/19339040

Not a local but sharing the word since this is highly needed.

 

Not a local but sharing the word since this is highly needed.

47
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Trump has instructed the US Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management to increase logging targets and for officials to circumvent the US’s Endangered Species Act by using unspecified emergency powers to ignore protections placed upon vulnerable creatures’ habitats.

This move is similar to recent instructions by Trump to use a rarely-used committee to push through fossil fuel projects even if they imperil at-risk species. Experts have said this overriding of the Endangered Species Act is probably illegal.

The order also stipulates logging projects can be sped up if they are for purported wildfire risk reduction, via “thinning” of vegetation that could ignite. Some scientists have said that aggressively felling forests, particularly established, fire-resistant trees, actually increases the risk of fast-moving fires.

“This Trump executive order is the most blatant attempt in American history by a president to hand over federal public lands to the logging industry,” said Chad Hanson, wildfire scientist at the John Muir Project.

“What’s worse, the executive order is built on a lie, as Trump falsely claims that more logging will curb wildfires and protect communities, while the overwhelming weight of evidence shows exactly the opposite.”

 
 

Hope this is on topic enough. Nice job to Angelenos for standing up to these bullies and defending our transit projects.

 
 

Certain trees survived, according to Cal Fire, because they have a natural adaptation to withstand fire, such as thick bark, a shape that sheds embers and higher moisture content than the structures that caught fire. “While trees may still be singed, they are often less flammable than structures,” according to the post.

view more: next ›