this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2025
259 points (100.0% liked)

Ukraine

11128 readers
296 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

Matrix Space


Community Rules

🇺🇦 Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🤢No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

💥Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

💳 Defense Aid 💥


💳 Humanitarian Aid ⚕️⛑️


🪖 Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


See also:

!nafo@lemm.ee

!combatvideos@SJW


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ukraine is set to field its first officially codified domestically built grenade launcher armed ground robot, after the Ministry of Defense approved the Droid NW 40 robotic combat system for service with the country’s Defense Forces, developer DevDroid said on December 23.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bklyn@piefed.social 55 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] Shortstack@reddthat.com 45 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Damn, we have to advance our cloning technology quick, that just doesn't roll off the toung.

[–] Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works 23 points 4 days ago

Be on the lookout for Russia's response based on historical robot champions.

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 40 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The launcher has a maximum effective range of up to 1.5 kilometers and can fire either single shots or bursts, with an onboard ammunition load of 48 rounds.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 4 days ago

Nice, a rapidfire grenade launcher. What will the kids think of next?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 20cello@lemmy.world 37 points 5 days ago

Invaders must die

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago

wow...

Imagine being a Russian on a horse charging a fortification because that seems to be WTF is going on now, and this fucking robot of death comes out and kills you with a fucking grenade launcher.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 19 points 4 days ago

When you're blitzing up the tech tree and the AI keeps building T1 infantry and cavalry.

[–] EnderLaw@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago (5 children)
  1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.

  2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.

  3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 41 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't think it will be programmed that way.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 19 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The writer of the laws himself made his career by writing an entire book series with stories about pointing out where the laws break down.

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

In this case I think they're broken down immediately because they won't be used.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)
  1. Spend months in a meeting room with everything from ethicists and philosopher to machine learning specialists and developers to figure out each nuance of the rules

  2. or program it to kill everything until the batteries run down and send it out within the hour

The answer in a war is always the second option.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Screamers. Check it out.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

He did also do some stories about 'fixing' the laws but in every case that resulted in either limiting the robots capabilities in a restricting way or requiring them to have more power over people in ways that could be harmful to humanites self autonomy in the longrun.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 29 points 5 days ago (1 children)
  1. A robot may not damage shareholder value or, through inaction, allow shareholder value to come to harm.
[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago

Must. Make. More. Paperclips.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 16 points 5 days ago

Asimov wasn’t any more of a legislator than Dante was a theologian

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (2 children)

There are loops. Killing a few Russian invaders will prevent many Ukrainian killings.

There's at least one story I can remember about that.

[–] doo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't think it's a loophole. Surgeons hurt people in order to prevent a greater pain. ruZZia is just a cancer.

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's seen as an unexpected loophole in the books. Similar to how a surgeon won't kill one healthy person to save two with their organs.

At least on I,Robot

Edit: also, on I,Robot they harmed very specific people with very calculated results. Not like going to war, even on the defensive side.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 4 days ago

From the first time I read this as a kid, I recognized that in order for a robot to adhere to these rules, they would have to be programmed with these rules. A bad-faith robot builder could simply not include that programming.

A bad-faith robot builder like literally every one that accepts US government contracts.

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 4 days ago

Slaughterbot

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 8 points 4 days ago

Our first Slaughterbot is born! Isn't she adorable?

[–] _Nico198X_@europe.pub 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

more of this, please. UA doesn't have enough soldiers to fight? modern problems require modern solutions.

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 11 points 4 days ago
[–] nocturne@piefed.social 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

From the thumbnail I thought they used an image of Johnny 5.

[–] smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 days ago

MUCH DISASSEMBLE!!

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 days ago

Hell ya, fuck them up!

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Command and conquers drone anti-tanks, which conveneiently serves as anti-infantry because you crush them.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

How about the Abrams getting PERCH systems to launch switchblade drones? That one is straight out of C&C Generals.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

funny thing russians had the v3 launcer in the game, then the "v4" in generals they hada drone version of this.

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al 3 points 4 days ago

Yeah this is going to end well.

load more comments
view more: next ›