259
Ukraine’s Ground Robot Tore Through Russian Troops—So It’s Now Armed With a Grenade Launcher
(united24media.com)
this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2025
259 points (100.0% liked)
Ukraine
11128 readers
401 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
Community Rules
🇺🇦 Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
🌻🤢No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
💥Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW
❗ Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
💳 Defense Aid 💥
💳 Humanitarian Aid ⚕️⛑️
🪖 Volunteer with the International Legionnaires
See also:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
I don't think it will be programmed that way.
The writer of the laws himself made his career by writing an entire book series with stories about pointing out where the laws break down.
In this case I think they're broken down immediately because they won't be used.
Spend months in a meeting room with everything from ethicists and philosopher to machine learning specialists and developers to figure out each nuance of the rules
or program it to kill everything until the batteries run down and send it out within the hour
The answer in a war is always the second option.
Screamers. Check it out.
He did also do some stories about 'fixing' the laws but in every case that resulted in either limiting the robots capabilities in a restricting way or requiring them to have more power over people in ways that could be harmful to humanites self autonomy in the longrun.
Must. Make. More. Paperclips.
Asimov wasn’t any more of a legislator than Dante was a theologian
There are loops. Killing a few Russian invaders will prevent many Ukrainian killings.
There's at least one story I can remember about that.
I don't think it's a loophole. Surgeons hurt people in order to prevent a greater pain. ruZZia is just a cancer.
It's seen as an unexpected loophole in the books. Similar to how a surgeon won't kill one healthy person to save two with their organs.
At least on I,Robot
Edit: also, on I,Robot they harmed very specific people with very calculated results. Not like going to war, even on the defensive side.
Where’s this from?
The Foundation adaptation on AppleTV. Where, famously, spoilers
Tap for spoiler
Demerzel, this robot in the gif, kills lots of people by exploring the loophole that let robots commit genocide in supposed compliance with the 3 laws.Holy shit. Random, I know but you just convinced me to check this out.
the show is solid
If you start on season 1, don’t let that dumpster fire dissuade you from the rest of the show. Once you get past that, the show is solid
the empire story line is basically what holds that season together imo
Yeah the plot lines outside of that are kinda garbage. And I say that as a fan of the original books.
yeah anything non empire is kinda bad until this latest season. idk if they condensed a lot of shit from the books or what, i never read them
It’s more that they sharply diverge from the core ethos of the books.
Dumping the admittedly misogynistic bent of the source material was a great move (including switching the gender of one of the core protagonists). Pretty much every other change made around the foundation-centric plots was straight up poor show running and writing. It goes from high sci-fi to “just another future-y action show”. And many of the plot changes are just.. completely nonsensical.
They also explore this on I, Robot
They are Isaac Asimov's rules for robots. Google it, it's a whole thing.
From the first time I read this as a kid, I recognized that in order for a robot to adhere to these rules, they would have to be programmed with these rules. A bad-faith robot builder could simply not include that programming.
A bad-faith robot builder like literally every one that accepts US government contracts.