this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
413 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

77713 readers
4029 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/55094518

“The UK government wants technology companies to block explicit images on phones and computers by default to protect children, with adults having to verify their age to create and access such content,” the FT report said. “Ministers want the likes of Apple and Google to incorporate nudity-detection algorithms into their device operating systems to prevent users taking photos or sharing images of genitalia unless they are verified as adults.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sqgl@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 hours ago

Looks like click-bait. It is a proposal from by one old fart in the 800 member House of Lords. Not a serious Bill.

Read this thread...

https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/1pnsawo/comment/nubbach/

Having said that, it is important to nip such ideas in the bud.

[–] treesquid@lemmy.world 29 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

England is turning into a really proper shithole country

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

American here......first time?

[–] specialseaweed@sh.itjust.works 22 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

As the dad of a teenager, I am "encouraging" him to put nudity blocking systems on his phone.

oh shit would you look at that i just taught him how to go around me and hide his behavior better im sure there will be no future consequences whatsoever

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago

The important thing isn't that your kids don't see porn, it's that they feel the requisite amount of shame and never talk to you about their sexuality.

Also, it's one more thing we can criminalize in a surveillance state. So now we can more easily extort horny people with fines and prison if we feel the need

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 19 hours ago

Why, yes I would like to get literally cockblocked by Google and Apple. Thanks UK! /s

[–] BigBolillo@mgtowlemmy.org 13 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Client side scanning, it's already happening in android running google services there are two apps automatically installed which at least I know scan photos in the device. One is android system saftycore and the other I can't remember the name.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks for the info. Didn't know that shit was on my phone. Deleted.

If you happen to remember the second app name, please post it.

[–] BigBolillo@mgtowlemmy.org 7 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

The other one is Android System Key Verifier, for that I'm not totally sure it's malware but as it have access to your end to end encrypted keys and the way it's secretly installed seems shady to me. Looks like a way for Google to intercept end to end encrypted messages for me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] habitualcynic@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Even if you’re morally opposed to the various things this addresses, it is so immensely concerning and unwise to want a corporation to have this much control over your actions, daily life, and liberty.

I don’t think enough people talk about that.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Takashiro@lemmy.today 34 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

In the end it isn't about the kids , what they want is control and tracking of everyone.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

Of course it is, because nobody is willing to try and quantify or qualify the harms that seeing pornography has on a young person. It's just "adult content" so we'll go so far as to put VR headsets on everyone and ask them to verify their age or else they get a PG, low-polygon representation of reality!

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 21 hours ago

Year of the linux phone

If they make it obligatory, sudo systemctl disable uk-spyware

(I know that in that case it would be illegal to disable, solvable with sudo systemctl enable uk-spyware-spoof)

[–] acme401@lemmy.world 17 points 22 hours ago

Gargle my balls, m'lord.

[–] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 4 points 16 hours ago

Gotta blur out those women's ankles.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 6 points 18 hours ago

I encourage UK's government to sit on it and rotate. And Keir Starmer can go do one with rusty barbed wire.

[–] pleaseletmein@lemmy.zip 3 points 15 hours ago

Remember when Tumblr banned porn, and implemented it so poorly that any photos with enough peach-ish or brown-ish colors got nuked for “displaying nudity”?

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

I will never buy a device that cockblocks me. I was talking shit about the nothing phone yesterday but I guess imma save up to buy it.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Kier Starmer is a nevernude. Pass it on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bringing back the prudish Victorian era?

[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

I could actually imagine Starmer flustered by the sight of an ankle.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

that will quickly turn into "continuously monitor your users' screens for what they are doing so you can detect nudity" where the real aim will ofcourse be surveillance and selling highly personal data. I don't know about Apple but google will be all over it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Block everything but calls and maps.

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

They’re obviously going about it the wrong way, but this is inching towards the right way to go - keep age verification like biometric verification, encrypted and on-device. That’s a million times better than getting random pron sites to ask for your biometric data.

If they’d started with this thought and then kept thinking from there, they could have ended up with something decent and effective, rather than the current shitshow.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 11 points 21 hours ago

Make it the software that comes with the device. So Samsung can install some child protection app and we just uninstall it. Anything bad ever happens on a kids phone? Why did the parents uninstall it?

Make the parents take the responsibility.

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 156 points 1 day ago (10 children)

OMG. These plans are getting on my nerves.

When a parent gives a kid their device and sets the child’s birthday, then enable these. If the birthday is over 18, the let them do what they want.

Let parents parent the kid and get the government out of my life.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 68 points 1 day ago (17 children)

Or just don’t fucking age gate shit.

Seriously who the fuck cares if a kid sees a titty?

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 50 points 1 day ago

Worse is that it likely won't be able to distinguish between intentionally titilating material and material intended to educate. Only over 18 are allowed to learn about human physiology after submitting identifying information.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Fuck you. My phone. My rules. Open source OS it is for my next phone...

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 106 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Puritanical bullshit... what the fuck.

*It's like tumblr banning nudity, which basically came down to banning any picture containing nipples. Except like, for a whole backwards country.

[–] RadicalCandour@startrek.website 2 points 12 hours ago

Man, I was at tumblr when this was being implemented. It was so fucking stupid and everyone knew it.

[–] horn_e4_beaver@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I think it's time to throw my phone in the river.

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 16 hours ago

Please don't, our rivers are polluted enough as it is

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 2 points 17 hours ago

Throw it on Stamer's head, at least you give it one last food use.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (14 children)

Ahhhhhh just fuck off you useless cunts! Why don't you fix the fact that we've got kids fucking starving in this country before worrying about if they've seen tits before they're 18?!

It's dumb shit like this that is really pushing me to KMS once my mother has passed on. I can't stand sharing oxygen with these morons.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 80 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

UK war on ...nudity?

Them being prude is nothing new but this takes the cake.

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not about nudity. It's about control. The government wants full control over your computer and mobile phones.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 day ago

Seems more reasonable to put UK-blocking systems on them...

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 38 points 1 day ago (3 children)

What a joke world we are living in. UK is getting too crazy with their "protection children" and introducing age limits by people providing their password and IDs. And chat control. And now this again, blocking these pictures would require massive privacy issues and closed source operating systems that will lock the user down like North Korea.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)

100 members of the lords vs one adguard filter

load more comments
view more: next ›