Guys, this has nothing to do with slavery. It's about protecting the states rights - MAGA
this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
239 points (99.6% liked)
News
33209 readers
2856 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
If it sucks ass, makes people's lives worse, or makes parasites richer, you can damn well expect this so-called government to okay it.
Fuck
These fucks cannot be consistent if their lives depended on it. "StAtEs RiGhTs" unless: fascism. Obvious exception.
To watch firsthand, the people who’s jobs it is to protect us, salivate over the idea of feeding us to the wolves while scary, is downright terrifying.
SMALL GOVERNMENT! - GOP
An EO to overrule state legislation? Is that even remotely legal? Can't the states just tell him to fuck off. The courts aren't going to throw state law out the window because the president says they are bad laws. It would take an act of Congress to do that and Congress failed in the attempt earlier this year.
I think he can write whatever unenforceable executive orders he wants. Enforcing them could be illegal, which would make them unenforceable executive orders.
It’s not illegal per se - it’s just not how EOs work.
It’s also illegal. It’s a violation of the 10th amendment. Powers not delegated to the federal government and not prohibited to the states are reserved for the states or the people. States have every right to make laws restricting the use of AI within their own borders.
(I am neither a lawyer nor a constitutional scholar.)
But the proposed EO has no power to do anything so it doesn’t really break the 10th.
(also neither a lawyer nor a constitutional scholar so this is only based on my very basic understanding. Fully prepared to hang my head in shame if someone more informed explains how I’m wrong)
If he enlists his agencies to, through legal actions, office raids, and city occupation to enforce his "powerless" EO, presumably the 10th starts being meaningful.
Fair point. I should have asked if it was 'legally sound' rather than just if it was legal.
Wasn’t trying to undercut you or anything - it just as absurd as you’ve said.
EOs are just the busywork the sycophants have given Trump to keep him happily busy marking up pages with his sharpie.
It’s illegal. It’s a violation of the 10th amendment. Powers not delegated to the federal government and not prohibited to the states are reserved for the states or the people. States have every right to make laws restricting the use of AI within their own borders.
(I am neither a lawyer nor a constitutional scholar.)
It may end up depending on the supreme court’s opinion.
There’s that MAGA micromanaging.
I'm pretty certain that won't work, but what do I know.
States right! But only when WE want to use them...
So AI ICE agent identification is OK?
Who cares do it anyway
Just pumping more air into the bubble.
Sadly, I think this is the entire reason for this. Anyone with a brain can see that people are buying favors from Trump left and right, and it is to the benefit of every AI-reliant overbloated company (nvidia included) to keep that bubble growing instead of risking a pop.
In the end, the technical limitations of AI are going to be the real regulation. As much as the grifters of the world will not admit it, you can't shove a useless technology down peoples throat at hundreds of billions dollars of expense and expect it to have a financial return for you.
Not before the destroy the environment though
And the economy…
and my axe.
and my bow.
And my hope for humanity.
Polygraphs and drug dogs are both proven to be bullshit and yet they still have the force of law in many places.
Not in the US for polygraphs.