this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
113 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

5195 readers
869 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Lovely story:

Deloitte will provide a partial refund to the federal government over a $440,000 report that contained several errors, after admitting it used generative artificial intelligence to help produce it. The Department of Employment and Workplace Relations (DEWR) confirmed Deloitte would repay the final instalment under its contract, which will be made public after the transaction is finalised. It comes as one Labor senator accused the consultancy firm of having a “human intelligence problem”.

LLM’s hallucinating? Completely shocking:

University of Sydney academic, Dr Christopher Rudge, who first highlighted the errors, said the report contained “hallucinations” where AI models may fill in gaps, misinterpret data, or try to guess answers.

[–] Funwayguy@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I like how we're all skimming over the fact that they fed federal compliance data into Azure OpenAI seemingly without permission or oversight.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 10 points 3 months ago

Accountability is non existentant at that level.

Until people who sign off on the worm are held criminally responsible, nothing will change.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I seriously hope they are off the list for future government contracts, too.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 6 points 3 months ago

Bitch plz... These parasites are organs of the regime

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I'm going for a hot take here. The issue is not using AI (barring privacy/confidentiality), but that it wasn't thoroughly validated.

I consider AI as a new trainee. Everything has to be validated by an experienced person.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 9 points 3 months ago

1st year makes predictable mistakes that are easier to review.

Llm will fucking fake shit and it is way harder to spot unless you resp the entire fucking thing yourself, which a that point loses all value from cost perspective.

AI is useful as support tool for middle level and senior pros since they can catch the lies as they happen

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

The issue is still using AI as its sensitive data and shouldnt be given to 3rd parties.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

Yup. That’s the biggest problem I see with AI. People don’t realize it’s fallible. They’re so busy wanting shortcuts and reduced work time that they’re ignoring the accuracy.

That’s part of why youre starting to see reports of AI not saving any time or money, you’re basically shifting it from the creation phase to the validation phase.