this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
736 points (98.4% liked)

Not The Onion

17243 readers
1053 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

‘For those of us with nothing to fear, the truth can’t come soon enough,’ the actor shared on X

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 35 points 23 hours ago

I mean, it's the one time he's guaranteed to not be named in a sexual assault case, so why not?

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm wondering what kind of international incident this will cause. Who else is in there, it can't be just Americans?

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Rich people are not an America-only issue.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 1 points 12 hours ago

That's my point.

[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 26 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] yagurlreese@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

😭😭😭 he's just salty

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"My computer recently crashed and I've lost all my friends' email addresses."

I think it's more like Epstein specialized in girls

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

my personal objection.

releasing the Epstein's files will include people he wanted to target but never got anywhere.

however, it would be very clear that those people are innocent, and they're will be people in the files that were clearly diddling children.

Either the files should be released in full and the only consequence for people who casually met Epstein and never interacted with him will be some conspiracy nuts harassing them. or at worse censor the list for those names.

Also, just because there isn't a file named "Epstein's client list.docx" doesn't mean there isn't info about his clients.

[–] freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world 26 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

"just because there isn't a file named "Epstein's client list.docx" doesn't mean there isn't info about his clients."

Exactly, this focus on a "list" drives me crazy. If detectives investigating a murder don't find a piece of paper with the victim's name on it in the killer's possession, they don't throw their hands up and say, damn he got away with it.

Epstein's entire business model revolved around having receipts on his clients, that's how he stayed out of prison for decades, and it's why they are covering it up now. This isn't a conspiracy theory, it's a supressed criminal investigation.

the conspiracy is about who (we know who) and why (we know why) the criminal investigation is being suppressed.

[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Anything to ratchet up the pressure on that orange toddler is welcomed.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 317 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Crazy how Spacey’s career abruptly ended, even though he was acquitted and/or found not guilty. Yet Trump, who has lost his civil sexual assault cases, is the fucking president of the United States and no one will do anything about it.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 70 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Spacey would still be making movies now if he’d just preyed on vulnerable women instead.

Dustin Hoffman, Ben Affleck, Morgan Freeman, Ryan Seacrest all have multiple SA allegations that they were able to play down and keep working, but those were all from women.

Most homophobia stems from the fear of male rape, so the usual meninist/MRA crowd who scrambled to defend “innocent until proven guilty” for Russell Brand (3 upcoming producer credits) are nowhere to be seen when it’s Spacey.

(for clarity, this is not a defense of Spacey, it’s an attack on hypocrisy)

[–] sturger@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only way I can lose is if I'm caught in bed with either a dead girl or a live boy.

-- Edwin Edwards

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Jesus Christ is that a real quote? It's accurate AF. Like, uncomfortably accurate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How can you mention these people and forget Jared Leto? He's an actual cult leader.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

I think if your whole brand is being a creepy weirdo, that sort of makes you immune to the consequences of being identified as one.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FundMECFS@quokk.au 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Worth noting Spacey is currently on Epstein flight logs that have been released

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 152 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You forgot about being a 34x convicted but not sentenced criminal.

He was sentenced, it's just that his sentence was ... nothing. Which of course is a totally appropriate penalty for a fucking felony.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 73 points 1 day ago

yes, it is revealing how flexible the conservative soul is when it comes to corruption and perversion, while simultaneously being inflexible about things like compassion, charity and kindness.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 53 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The only true thing Trump has ever uttered was that he could shoot someone on 5th Ave and not lose support.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

probably becauses hes into male minors. and not female like most of the pedophiles/ephebophiles out there.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 83 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's just a synonym for libertarian.

[–] Doom@ttrpg.network 18 points 1 day ago

That's so funny

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's a distinction some make, where pedophiles go for the kid kids, like prepubescent, where ephebophiles want the ones who have at least started puberty but are still kids.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Hold my beer, it's even more complicated

  • Infantophiles go for 0-5 (up until developed consciousness)
  • Pedophiles ~6-beginning of puberty
  • Hebephiles - going through puberty
  • Ephebophiles - after puberty but before adulthood
  • Teleiophiles - 18-late 30s
  • Mesophiles - 40s-60s
  • Gerontophiles - 70+

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronophilia

Don't ask me why I know, I just like getting to the grit of things.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm going to accuse some people of being Teleiophiles and Mesophiles.

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago

Careful with the mesophile label, some microbiologists may start watching you with interest.

load more comments (1 replies)

Okay, but then why did you laminate the legal statute so you could carry it in your wallet?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] javiwhite@feddit.uk 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He saw Stephen King get called a nonce for claiming the list didn't exist and saw an opportunity.

Oh, King's for sure on that list if he's saying that.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh no, I thought King was one of the good ones. Is there still some hope? What was the context?

[–] Ebber@lemmings.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

https://sh.itjust.works/post/42235147

If it is supposed to be a joke, it didn't stick the landing

[–] Stillwater@sh.itjust.works 174 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We don't need your help here..

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago (36 children)

Right? Like we get it, you're not in the files, and you want to remind everyone you were acquitted and found not civilly liable of your own sexual misconduct. But "not guilty" is not the same as "innocent," and dodging legal responsibility is not vindication.

load more comments (36 replies)
[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago

Soup be thickening.

load more comments
view more: next ›