this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
753 points (98.5% liked)

Not The Onion

17243 readers
644 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

‘For those of us with nothing to fear, the truth can’t come soon enough,’ the actor shared on X

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's a distinction some make, where pedophiles go for the kid kids, like prepubescent, where ephebophiles want the ones who have at least started puberty but are still kids.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Hold my beer, it's even more complicated

  • Infantophiles go for 0-5 (up until developed consciousness)
  • Pedophiles ~6-beginning of puberty
  • Hebephiles - going through puberty
  • Ephebophiles - after puberty but before adulthood
  • Teleiophiles - 18-late 30s
  • Mesophiles - 40s-60s
  • Gerontophiles - 70+

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronophilia

Don't ask me why I know, I just like getting to the grit of things.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm going to accuse some people of being Teleiophiles and Mesophiles.

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago

Careful with the mesophile label, some microbiologists may start watching you with interest.

Okay, but then why did you laminate the legal statute so you could carry it in your wallet?

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

some

Never seen such a loaded some.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Actually it's sort of scientific consensus. Not that it matters much for casual conversation (do not fuck minors, what's so hard about that), but the distinction is real.

obligatory nerdy note that all those -philias refer to attraction, and not action; pedophile might not abuse children but still be pedophile; child abuser is not necessarily pedophile