this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
126 points (92.6% liked)

News

30697 readers
4002 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 10 points 4 hours ago

The old school dems will team up with the majority of Rs and nothing will change. Anything to keep progressives from taking power.

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 136 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

“The Republican Party, as many of us know it, no longer exists,” said one source, who asked not to be named. “We do not recognize ourselves anymore in Trump’s administration. There is a strong movement out there in the party to reclaim the values we were raised on and reclaim the middle ground.”

Translation: "Omg can you believe this leopard is eating my face? Now that I'm personally affected by my own stupidity I want to be friends with Democrats!"

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

And somehow, just somehow, his bills get passed.

[–] dmention7@midwest.social 5 points 2 hours ago

They are concerned, but not concerned enough to risk losing reelection by going on record as being concerned.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 93 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (5 children)

This is a good thing. Don't mock people for realizing their party has abandoned them and acting accordingly.

Better late than never, but we need to support this ideal.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 66 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

and reclaim the middle ground.”

Bullshit it's good, it's a farce to make the "middle" somewhere between the right wing Democrats and the ultra right wing unhinged fascists of the Republicans.

None of them are going "Damn we shoulda listened to Sanders."

They've learned fuck-all.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

o asked not to be named. “We do not recognize ourselves anymore in Trump’s administration. There is a strong movement out there in the party to reclaim the values we were raised on and reclaim the middle ground.”

Translation: “Omg can you believe this leopard is eating my face? Now that I’m perso

But getting fucked by 51-49 votes is I think much more difficult to solve than getting fucked by 65-35 votes. When there's 1-2 votes diff, people don't know why they're fucked and what needs to be done to stop it. When it's 65-35, it's much more obvious what is to be done and what campaigns have to do to organize voters.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I dunno man, that still feels like they're saying they basically agree with like 80% of what Republicans want to do in terms of giving tax breaks to the rich and cutting benefits for the poor. It seems like the bridge too far for them has been the actual fascism and tossing out the rule of law. Which is nice, but it means that this other new party will still be enabling some of the worst aspects of the Republicans if they indeed got a split like you are theorizing. That means that 65-35 split will be solidly on the side of "fuck the little guy" even if they won't outright support fascism.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 hours ago

100%. And I think such a status quo would be much more easy to organize voters against. Picture AOC talking to a crowd and saying how the oligarchs have 2/3 of politicians in the form of those two parties and we need to close the gap by electing more of ours - 15-20 more. Now it's like - the oligarchs are buying politicians. OK, which ones? OK, what do we do, run independents or primary them within the Democratic party? What other shit can the party pull to fuck us over? Could be totally wrong, I'm just thinking here.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip 11 points 7 hours ago

I mean, hell, if the right wing Dems separate from the progressives and join the less-crazy-than-maga centerish Republicans and they go play in corporate-funded Neverland that hopefully no sane voter would touch with a ten foot pole, a real progressive party might actually become a possibility. It'll isolate the magats and push them back into a hole, we may get a more moderate conservative party that could be open to compromising again, and hopefully a coalition of real progressives can begin putting forward some much needed ideas.

The key will be ensuring that that progressive party is funded well enough to compete with the corporate money that is pumped by the truckload into that new coalition (which will be a feat in itself).

I dunno, just anything to get these fucking fleas out of our politics.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Seriously, more party options is a good thing even if some of them suuuck.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 hours ago

This one definitely suuuuucks. Just a little bit less than where we’re at now.

[–] girthero@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

They still deserve mockery for taking 9 years to realize it!

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 hours ago

And for many other reasons, honestly

[–] arin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Their "ideals" allowed for this fascist regime to start

[–] atticus88th@lemmy.world 17 points 6 hours ago

They said the same thing after Nixon... and after Reagan... and now after Trump. Moderates will eat it up and we will end up worse on the next cycle of debauchery.

[–] Brokkr@lemmy.world 59 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

A real simple fix would be ranked choice voting.

[–] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 41 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

fix

Which is why it won't happen.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

After Mamdani, they're scared as fuck of ranked choice elections.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

They already were. The right has been sneaking bans on ranked choice voting into many red state legislations for many years now.

You may be thinking "how could they convince people to vote against ranked choice voting?!" By piggybacking on xenophobia of course!

Even though that wouldn't have mattered in his case. He would have won the primary without the need for ranked choice.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 12 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

I live in uber-blue Oregon and the Dem politicians here rallied against it and got it defeated on the 2024 ballot.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 14 points 6 hours ago

Same here in Massachusetts back in 2020.

It's not necessarily a GOP vs Dem issue, it's dominant parties worried that giving voters more choice will weaken their control.

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

We have it for Portland though! And it's working

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

What's bullshit? 4 out of 18 Democratic state senators claimed to support it and 14 out of 36 Democratic state reps claimed to support it.

Only 3 Republican state legislators opposed it so Republicans must have been in favor of it too, right?

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 hours ago

These cats don’t actually want to fix anything.

[–] londos@lemmy.world 62 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

"Vote blue no matter who, but also we'll leave the party completely at the slightest hint you want to reduce income inequality and fix the broken social safety net."

Edit: Actually, good, fuck em. Why should the left need to start its own party. We're the Democrats now. Any Democratic official who leaves the party for this should be abandoned forever.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 22 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck that. Dem leadership has abandoned the people. The Democratic and Republicans are finished

[–] londos@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

Probably true, but it's easier to move into an empty house than build a new one.

[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 39 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Ah, the Obstructionist Party.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 6 points 8 hours ago

That's not what GOP stands for?

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

At this point, any bumps in the road to unfettered misogynist, bigoted, surveillance christofacist power would be helpful while the left gets a real party together.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 26 points 8 hours ago

This seems like a trap that will enable the MAGAs to win more elections without a majority of votes.....

[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 23 points 8 hours ago

Yeah, nah, we're good dawgs. The democrat-republican third party would just be what the Dems are now - a right-of-center status quo capitulation party. Fuck every single one of you and your mothers. Have a good day.

[–] ChillCapybara@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 7 hours ago

“We need to get back to our centrist roots. This authoritarianism is hurting profits” said the capitalists en masse

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 11 points 8 hours ago

Should’ve pushed for ranked choice voting when they had the chance.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The article doesn't name names and only mentions "centerists." Those can all fuck off and make their own party. It will split the republican votes the most.

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Republicans is more cultish then democrats. Democrats politician would be more open to a third party

[–] ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

It'll be hard for Democrats to decide between the existing center-right capitalist status quo party and the new center-right capitalist status quo party. Meanwhile most Republicans just know they love fascism.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 8 hours ago

Oh, great. That's what we want. A third party that's also right-of-center. Yay.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Wish they were in discussion to overhaul our fptp voting system. Any third party is doomed to fail, by design, until first past the post is in the rear view mirror.

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Good luck to find enough politicians deciding to vote yes for a change to presidential elections electoral system

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Totally agree

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 5 points 7 hours ago

Center right and far right party join together, to create the right party

[–] tomatolung@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 hours ago
[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I guess Trump is going to get that 3rd term after all

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 7 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

He won't live that long. If nature doesn't kill him, his party will.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 3 points 7 hours ago

All these left of fascist, but still love some good old fashioned racism and misogyny shitheads, will hopefully leave some room for more progressives on the left, and the Right will continue in just more dysfunction.

load more comments
view more: next ›