this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
1017 points (97.7% liked)

memes

14820 readers
4232 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1017
Ask A&W (lemmy.world)
submitted 17 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) by Stamets@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world
 

Edit: It will never cease to make me laugh that I get more genuinely serious discussion comments on my meme posts in /c/Memes than anywhere else. I'm not hating, I love it.

Edit 2: Chicago-Style deep dish pizza isn't pizza go fuck yourself

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blass_Rose@pawb.social 1 points 21 minutes ago

Literally at my restaurant right now the burger with 3 smaller patties is more popular than the burger with 2 bigger patties. Same total amount of meat, just taller on a smaller bun...

[–] CallateCoyote@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

It's true. I'm a bartender. When I serve a drink in a to-go cup I sometimes get people bitching "oh, that's all I get?" and then I passive aggressively demonstrate to them that it's the same as it would be in a pint glass but it's just shorter and wider.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Especially sucks for people with jaw problems who can't open their mouth that wide. But you're totally wrong about deep dish pizza

[–] valkyrieangela@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 4 hours ago

It's not a comparison of size, it's just the formatting of the sandwich to fit better with the way the human jaw is made... What a dumb argument

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Burgers should neither be taller nor wider. Just give me two normal sized burgers.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 1 points 2 hours ago

Or eight. I have a large appetite. I'm only 10kg overweight. Honestly, a monster burger sounds pretty good too. I have eaten a few challenge burgers (and won) but the ones that are ten patties tall, you have to dismantle them to eat them. I support wider burgers. But every topping needs to be all across the thing or they are just serving lazy garbage.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 18 points 7 hours ago

I think wider is better so you don't have to unhinge your jaw like a snake to eat it.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 35 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

The A&W thing is more about Americans sucking ass at math than the difference between a wider or taller burger.

They had a 1/3lb burger and dipshits thought the 1/4lb was bigger because they don't understand fractions.

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

A 1/2 lb is bigger than 1/3 lb; what are you on? Did you mis-state something?

[–] Glaedr304@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

They said 1/3 > 1/4, you misread the comment

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

They edited it and fixed it now, just didn’t state why they edited.

[–] ArtificialLink@lemy.lol 1 points 39 minutes ago

Oh no the edit police for a typo lmao

[–] drdalek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

This is a dumb response. Wider is easier to fit in your mouth and doesnt fall apart. Taller is just a mess and challenge to eat

TLDR: it's not a volume issue, its a distribution

[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 25 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

That is the point of the meme.

It's a reference to the third-pound burger, and how consumers thought 1/3 was less than 1/4.

[–] D_C@lemm.ee 12 points 10 hours ago

Exactly. Where I used to work there was a greasy cafe type place around the corner and the baps got wider the more stuff you ordered. If you ordered the Full Monty the burger bap was wider than my head. MY HEAD.
You're damn right I would order it every time I went in. It was glorious...and very unhealthy, but also glorious.

[–] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

As a sophisticated man of discriminating taste and impeccable manners, I eat these crazy tall burgers with a knife and fork. Just kidding, I use a knife and fork because they are too tall for my mouth and too messy for my beard.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

A beard is for enjoying leftovers later. Get with the program, beardo.

[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 36 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Nah. If you put two plates in front of me and one had a regular burger on it and the other had a burger that was as wide as the plate itself, I'd pick the one that most accurately reflects how much I hate myself at that moment.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 4 points 8 hours ago

You could also just have 2 regular sized ones or stop being such a fat ass.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 29 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

But wider = more taste surface. See smash burgers. Taller is just... more burger to toppings ratio. Diminishing returns, imo.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Smashburgers are about hijaking the Maillard reaction. Thinner meat means more browning.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

So the ideal burger is basically the size and shape of a pancake.

[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] kassiopaea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 hours ago

I went into Applebee's the other day and saw a quesadilla burger on the menu... I didn't get it because I didn't want a burger, but it did look really good.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Artyom@lemm.ee -3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Wider means you get more of the same, taller means you can get more ingredients. If I order a burger with all the fixings, I'd rather a tall burger than lettuce to one side and onion to the other.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I agree that you can get more ingredients, but I can fit a lot of ingredients in a burger that doesn't have to be a mile high. I don't want a quarter inch (6+mm) of red onion on a burger. I don't want a giant piece of lettuce like you mentioned. I don't need thick tomatoes either.

Not that we should eat this, but I can go toasted Brioche bun, light BBQ sauce, 1/5 pound pattie, pulled pork mixed with Mac and Cheese, caramelized onions, light BBQ drizzle, toasted top brioche bun and that's a lot to put on a burger but it can be done easily without your mouth having to be unhinged to bite into it. Someone will probably tell me to throw cheese in there, because we Americans are hurting for a heart attack, but still easily doable.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Thanks to pizza, even Americans are familiar with the concept of wide

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 83 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (38 children)

I disagree with the glasses part as counterargument. Pizzas are sold by diameter in places that offer large and small - some even do medium. I also believe it would be nicer to have wider burgers instead of taller

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 75 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Counterpoint - pizzas are sold by diameter, but pretty much everyone I know underestimates how diameter corresponds to actual pizza size and think a 16" pizza is twice as big as an 8" pizza instead of four times as big, which it actually is. Meanwhile, a burger patty that is twice as big as another one is actually twice as tall, while one that is wider is only about ~41% wider. Vertical dimension is more intuitive for the overall mass difference.

[–] nyctre@lemmy.world 21 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Just sell by patty weight.

[–] Mesophar@pawb.social 39 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

Until you start selling a 1/3 lb burger to outcompete the 1/4 lb burger, but people are "4 is more than 3!" so your marketing fails...

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 34 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Them later advertising it as 3/9ths is pretty funny though.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago

"The one on the right is better because the thingy is lifting it higher and the arrow is pointing to it!" -- idiots, probably

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (37 replies)
[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 24 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (8 children)

In my boyfriend's hometown they used to have this restaurant that served this thing called a hubcap burger

And it was indeed, wide enough to be the hubcap of a car, while being basically flat.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] theblips@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I get bigger burgers not for more food but for more satisfying bites. A tall stacked smash burger or a juicy pink tall burger are way more satisfying to bite into

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Three or four patties do not make a big burger, in my opinion they begin at 8 stacked, or at least a kilo if it is a single patty. You're describing a regular snack of a burger. I want all of the fixins too.

load more comments
view more: next ›