this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
847 points (98.4% liked)

memes

14820 readers
4232 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
847
Ask A&W (lemmy.world)
submitted 9 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) by Stamets@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world
 

Edit: It will never cease to make me laugh that I get more genuinely serious discussion comments on my meme posts in /c/Memes than anywhere else. I'm not hating, I love it.

Edit 2: Chicago-Style deep dish pizza isn't pizza go fuck yourself

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theblips@lemm.ee 2 points 9 minutes ago

I get bigger burgers not for more food but for more satisfying bites. A tall stacked smash burger or a juicy pink tall burger are way more satisfying to bite into

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 1 hour ago

You could also just have 2 regular sized ones or stop being such a fat ass.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 28 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

The A&W thing is more about Americans sucking ass at math than the difference between a wider or taller burger.

They had a 1/3lb burger and dipshits thought the 1/4lb was bigger because they don't understand fractions.

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

A 1/2 lb is bigger than 1/3 lb; what are you on? Did you mis-state something?

[–] Glaedr304@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

They said 1/3 > 1/4, you misread the comment

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 hour ago

They edited it and fixed it now, just didn’t state why they edited.

[–] drdalek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

This is a dumb response. Wider is easier to fit in your mouth and doesnt fall apart. Taller is just a mess and challenge to eat

TLDR: it's not a volume issue, its a distribution

[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

That is the point of the meme.

It's a reference to the third-pound burger, and how consumers thought 1/3 was less than 1/4.

[–] D_C@lemm.ee 11 points 3 hours ago

Exactly. Where I used to work there was a greasy cafe type place around the corner and the baps got wider the more stuff you ordered. If you ordered the Full Monty the burger bap was wider than my head. MY HEAD.
You're damn right I would order it every time I went in. It was glorious...and very unhealthy, but also glorious.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Thanks to pizza, even Americans are familiar with the concept of wide

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 hours ago

But how many people know that a pizza x times wider is x² times more pizza?

[–] ThanksObama@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Except in Chicago, cause you know.... Deep dish.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 25 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

But wider = more taste surface. See smash burgers. Taller is just... more burger to toppings ratio. Diminishing returns, imo.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 21 minutes ago

Smashburgers are about hijaking the Maillard reaction. Thinner meat means more browning.

[–] sykaster@feddit.nl 1 points 2 hours ago

Unless taller adds additional burgers to the burger. Got this place in my town, they serve their burgers with 2 150g patties. Great stuff!

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

So the ideal burger is basically the size and shape of a pancake.

[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 12 points 4 hours ago

A quesadilla.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 33 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Nah. If you put two plates in front of me and one had a regular burger on it and the other had a burger that was as wide as the plate itself, I'd pick the one that most accurately reflects how much I hate myself at that moment.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago

Schlotzky's proved this out decades ago.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

I’d eat em both

[–] Batman@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

At a certain point you have to cut the burger like a pizza though

[–] spacesailor@lemm.ee 4 points 3 hours ago

But you dont have to dislocate your jaw ro eat it :)

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Mmmh, pirger.

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 23 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

In my boyfriend's hometown they used to have this restaurant that served this thing called a hubcap burger

And it was indeed, wide enough to be the hubcap of a car, while being basically flat.

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

There was a Hubcap Grill in Houston that had the best burger in a city that has a lot of great burgers.

They say they named it that because of a method of cooking a burger on a skillet, where you place a metal plate over the beef as it cooks to reduce splattering. The joke was that the burgers were so big that they needed to use a hubcap instead of a plate. And it was pretty close to true. Those burgers were massive and incredible.

They still have a few locations, including one in Hobby airport. But the original, which was a hole in the wall in downtown Houston, was the best.

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I mean... I'm hungry...

Where's the address?

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Shawdow194@fedia.io 18 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz 25 points 7 hours ago (4 children)
[–] SoloCritical@lemm.ee 24 points 6 hours ago (13 children)

Never forget that the 1/3 pounder failed because people were too dumb to realize that 1/3 is bigger than 1/4…

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

Food for thought: a sufficiently tall and narrow burger ain't a burger anymore, when it's roughly spherical rather than roughly cylindrical it's also not a burger and if it's large and brick-like it's yet something else.

spoilerCevapcici Kofta; Meatball; Meatloaf.

So burger is a geometrically bound dish definition.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 hours ago

Heuristics are real things deserving of both respect and fear.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 76 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (35 children)

I disagree with the glasses part as counterargument. Pizzas are sold by diameter in places that offer large and small - some even do medium. I also believe it would be nicer to have wider burgers instead of taller

[–] rishado@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Well that only works because pizza is a 2 dimensional food

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 64 points 8 hours ago (11 children)

Counterpoint - pizzas are sold by diameter, but pretty much everyone I know underestimates how diameter corresponds to actual pizza size and think a 16" pizza is twice as big as an 8" pizza instead of four times as big, which it actually is. Meanwhile, a burger patty that is twice as big as another one is actually twice as tall, while one that is wider is only about ~41% wider. Vertical dimension is more intuitive for the overall mass difference.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›