this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
140 points (99.3% liked)

Canada

9677 readers
672 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago

How about giving us income splitting so that I don't pay more in taxes than a two income family that makes more than I do?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 14 hours ago

So what are they defining as "middle class" for this round? gotta love the journalism of CTV that seemed OK leaving this as "will lower tax for some Canadians"... some precise reporting there

[–] [email protected] 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It is time for a radical change in how we progress as a society. Money sure ain't working. "Let's keep turning these money knobs and see what happens" should not be the ultimate answer for forward progress towards something resembling a utopia, which should be the goal. I have no answers but it seems that fiddling around with economy and hoping for the best is nothing more than just killing time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Absolutely. Money is a signifier that only has meaning when integrated in material exchanges. Radical, bold restructurations are needed in order to ameliorate our country's socioeconomic reality.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Disappointing to see adoption of CPC/PP platform cluelessness policy priority. Canada needs to spend on industrial policy to fight US, and prepare for hardships. His first BS of offering US empire more weapons purchases for more force multiplier warmongering was embarassing enough. Head in the sand "negotiations" is not going to go well.

Priority needs to be to destroy US economy, to save Canada's. If plan is to do nothing, we can do without an auto industry too, but waiting until the crisis evolves is just negligent.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

The Liberals don't care about debt, that is for some future party to worry about, during a debt crisis.

The NDP want a lot of social programs with high taxes, the Cons want low taxes and fewer programs, the Liberals offer a lot of social spending and low taxes by shamelessly abusing government debt.

The debt can be abused because its backed by our ability to liquidate our public pension to pay creditors, as outlined in the last budget Freeland released.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Instead of tax cuts to help the middle class, what they should really do is:

Reduce privatization.

So much of our country is owned privately for the sake of profit.

This is why everything is so expensive, it’s because we let rent seekers own our infrastructure.

I want my government to start making money without further relying on middle class income.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Yeah, private ownership concentration is a huge problem leading to monopolies, lack of innovation, and worsening treatment of both customers and employees in general. As I understand it, all funds have increasingly gone to parasitic shareholders more than ever since CEO pay has shifted more and more to pay in company stock.

I’d love more publicly-run utility and transportation networks as you said, but in other less critical areas we could probably benefit from a more competitive system of small-to-medium-sized cooperatives that could (ideally, in a perfect world) replace corporations entirely. I would love to see support for worker groups with solid business plans to receive government grants (or at least forgiving loans) to help them buy their private sector workplaces for conversion to a democratic business model where employee-owners don’t get treated like serfs and businesses have to win over customers to survive, rather than trapping them and getting complacent.

*edited to add that last bit in italics

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yea but that's the Liberal party you're talking about. If you want that, you should vote NDP.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

The NDP does not support land value tax.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Sweet now let's raise it on foreign billionaires who try to defraud our EV rebates

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

I'm kind of hoping they will. The government does not have too much money right now. I see no reason not to add a few percent to the top or second-to-top tax bracket.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

Let's also do domestic billionaires (yea we have some).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago (46 children)

I'll repeat again, I don't need a fucking tax cut. I need the price of housing to start going down.

Increase taxes on property significantly, and use 100% of that money to give everyone a basic income.

This incentivizes both people and developers to be efficient with their housing choices. Using too much housing for the area you live in? You pay extra to help out everyone. Using the right amount? No harm to you. Using less than the average? Here's a payout, thank you.

Prices overall will drop, because it's no longer profitable to simply own a home due to the taxes, and especially not if there's no people in it because the taxes won't be offset by the basic income.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

He's also planning to start a big government-driven building program at some point.

I don't expect this guy is going to do a basic income. That's a radical policy that's not really on-brand for him, and we have some crises going on that need the political oxygen.

load more comments (45 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

This is to placate people who think voting gives you instant gratification. This isn't for people who pay attention.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago (9 children)

I think that increasing the basic personal exemption would have helped a lot more lower income Canadians

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

Make it an official tax bracket too, instead just a refund everyone qualifies for. I don't know why TF it's set up that way.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›