this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
144 points (98.6% liked)

Canada

9677 readers
594 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This is a red herring.

I ran the calculations a while back, that may free up 2-4% of all housing, that is not enough to fix the problem of expensive housing. That's only 1-2 years of new building stock.

It won't hurt to do it, but it's simply not the main reason real estate is expensive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

extremely curious what such a calculation entails?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

I looked up the statscan data for home ownership and cross referenced it against other statscan data on rental buildings and locations of secondary homes(cottages and lake homes)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We definitely need more housing across canada, but BC has been notorious for vacant homes and airbnb units, thus the ban on airbnb and the added vacancy tax out here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And it should be obvious that despite new regulations being put in for Foreign buyers, Vacant units, and Airbnb, the prices haven't dropped to even pre-pandemic levels, let alone any useful amount, and they're expected to keep climbing this year.

These are all small red herrings that are easy PR wins for the government, but don't actually do anything useful to the prices.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They did drop for us in Vancouver. I'm not suggesting it accounts for the high prices everywhere but it definetly had a market affect as airbnb people dumped their additional units. One owner had over 40

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Or it just happened to coincide with a massive jump in interest rates which also affected prices elsewhere that didn't implement these policies.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

No there are articles about the affect upon announcement and then institution

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

and yet if you go look at the charts for say Vancouver and Toronto over the same period of time you can clearly see there's little to no effect from BC's policy changes.

And it's still a couple million dollars to buy a detached home in Vancouver, and the cheapest 2 bedroom condo is a half million (and it's literally on East Hastings) with most normal 2 bedrooms being listed at $600-700k

These policies haven't made anything affordable, and they aren't going to make things affordable.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

Oh they didn't make it affordable, I just meant we saw price drop in market and assessments. Prices here are ridiculous. We paid 415k for 2 bedroom apartment, now it is 575k but before the changes they were selling for 675k sight unseen, just buyers snapping them up

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago

And thus many of those buyers moved to other Canadian cities and did the same thing as Vancouver.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

As someone who's trying to move back to Canada, I'm also reading that a lot of the places owned by these investors are basically useless boxes that no local would live in. So even if they got freed up, there'd be very little demand for them.