this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
51 points (77.4% liked)

Ask Lemmy

31346 readers
1421 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Can someone remind me why we stopped using Firefox a while back? There was some piece of news that broke everyone's trust, but I can't remember what Mozilla did. Was it a change in their user agreement?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 27 points 15 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I stopped using Firefox for four core reasons:

Their investment into AI How they submit and work with their Google overlords to some degree Their browser putting in more and more unnecessary and unasked features (like Firefox account for one) Their Terms of Service

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago

CEO compensation too

[–] [email protected] 8 points 16 hours ago

Misinformation

[–] [email protected] 6 points 15 hours ago

I never stopped using it. There are privacy issues with all browsers. I like how Firefox works, but I regularly end up using Firefox, chrome, and edge all at the same time. I use them for some compartmentalization of my tasks and work lol

[–] [email protected] 8 points 18 hours ago

Firefox is essential for its various forks even if you have gripes with it

[–] [email protected] 122 points 1 day ago

Who is this "we" you talk of?

[–] [email protected] 99 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who is this "we"? I still use it, never stopped.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Can't come back to Firefox if you never leave in the first place

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

~~I come back to it every morning~~ wait no, I don't close my 1000+ tabs or shut down my Windows. Never mind.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago (5 children)

When? There have been a few times people stopped using Firefox in large numbers.

One of them was when Chrome first came out. Firefox (and every other browser) at the time ran every site in one process. As sites became more reliant on Javascript, which was usually poorly written, that meant any one tab having a problem made other sites and even the browser's own UI unresponsive, or sometimes crashed the whole browser. Chrome's multiprocess model was a revelation. Firefox didn't get its own implementation until 2016.

Recently, there's been some movement away from Firefox due to Mozilla making decisions people don't feel align with open source, the open web, and privacy. The one that has me looking at forks is the planned addition of terms of use to the browser. Terms of use are for an ongoing relationship between a service operator and a user; Firefox is local software I'm operating myself on a computer I own. Its fine for optional online services like Sync to have terms of use, but the browser should work without those.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 23 hours ago

That's what I was remembering, the terms of use.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

I recently tried to migrate to Firefox after the v2 extension changes in Chrome. I worked, but there were a few things that bothered me.

Chrome and chromium browsers will automatically use the window last used in the MacOS workspace you are in, and this usually works nicely when you have a work workspace and a personal workspace. It keeps things nicely separated when you click on links. Firefox doesn’t do that. It uses whatever window you last accessed. Not the end of the world.

The real problem I had is that the performance when using web tools like grafana in Firefox is so much worse compared to chromium based browsers. It was unbearable. I haven’t tried WebKit yet to see the same services in safari, for example.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The thing is, I never have. Chrome is absolute hot garbage and spyware, all the Chromium forks are all flawed and bugged and still feed into Google's dominance because of engine and stupid Manifest bullshit. Firefox, despite all the stupid things Mozilla did and still does just works the best and is not Chromium.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly, as a "non-power" Firefox user, the only issues I'm experiencing is when Google purposely slows down or messes with me simply because I use Firefox (e.g., YouTube).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Can you elaborate on the manifest bullshit thing?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago

New Chromium framework for browser extensions that severely limits their functionality. It neuters adlockers.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Here, this should help. tl;dr: Google updated how Chrome security works and it broke apps like every adblocker at the time.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

It didn't break adblockers "at the time". It broke them intentionally. That was by design. Google is an advertising company dabbling in other areas. They don't want a browser that can properly block their primary revenue.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

It was intentional to block/break adblockers. Google is worlds largest advertiser...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Google sells it as an updated extension framework to improve security, privacy, and performance of extensions... But it also nerfs adblockers ability to block all ads.

There are some forks from chrome that haven't implemented the new manifest thing. So if you really need to, look for those.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

Any suggestions?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 22 hours ago

Firefox is better than most but still smugly makes anti-user changes which are complete dog shit.

Remember when they turned off your ability to choose to load extensions that weren’t signed, because fuck you?

Fuck Pepperidge farm, I remember that shit.

Or how about DNS over https, because fuck you, user, why should you have any say over name resolution when you might use that power to block ads and malware?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago

I've been back to Firefox for about a year now. Left chrome for it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago

I am lazy and have yet to switch to a new fork.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago

Still using it here

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I believe you're thinking of a ToS change where the wording was incredibly vague, leading to some outlets to claim they were selling browsing data to 3rd parties and AI modelers. They changed it right after to specify that the data they were using wasn't browsing data, and the data they did gather wouldn't be used for AI. They are not as invasive as google, but you're subject to Google on Firefox because of the ubiquity of their telemetry and search optimizations across websites. Firefox with an add-on such as noscript is much better than Chrome still, in my opinion. At the very least, it's nice to have a browser that doesn't work to undermine its own add-on functionalities.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

This. It has been everywhere here around, if someone denies it, is lying! It was nothing in the end but in the meantime I tried Zen (based on FF) and it's aesthetically more pleasing to me

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I never fully did, but I did end up using Chromium more than I wanted to:

  1. Some poorly written sites refuse to work with FF. My water company, for example. They eventually fixed it after I complained multiple times. Now they display a warning that it's "Optimized for Chrome" but no longer flat out prevent FF from logging in (you know, to pay bills and such).
  2. FF Desktop still doesn't support PWAs, and their recent update says they're working on it, but they're half-assing it (installed web apps will still have the menu bars, address, bar etc). I self-host a lot of web applications and want them to appear like native apps. Hence, Chromium.
  3. There was some recent ToS / Privacy Policy change, and everyone was knee-jerking "time to abandon Firefox" as if there's anywhere better to go. (This is probably what you're thinking of)
  4. A good while back, Chrom(ium) was just flat-out faster. That's been a while, and I think when FF's "Quantum" update (or whatever it was called) came out in like 2016 or 2017, it put it back on par.
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A good while back, Chrom(ium) was just flat-out faster

Performance was huge.

I was willing to put up with a little jank from my browser because I wanted a diverse browser ecosystem, but Chrome felt much, much now performant. After I switched to Chrome, browsing felt noticably better.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

A good while back, Chrome was superior. Faster yes, but also more polished and intuitive as browsers go.

Also, Google was "Do no Evil", and Firefox was good, but not great.

Today, Firefox is still good, and Google is evil.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Times definitely have changed.

Also, Google was "Do no Evil"

At the time Google seemed awesome. Gmail was a game changer - a usable webapp that was better than maybe clients.

Firefox was good, but not great.

Firefox was the best of a bad bunch. It was so easy for devs to move to Chrome because the experience on every other browser was bad.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The recent main one seemed to be no longer promising to not sell user data, but it's been a culmination of little things.

https://www.zdnet.com/article/the-firefox-i-loved-is-gone-how-to-protect-your-privacy-on-it-now/

Personally I've been kind of miffed since they decided to use the experiments feature to be paid to shill for the Mr. Robot tv show, including in their enterprise release, making people think they got hacked. But that was years ago and forgotten.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Because Librewolf exists and Mozilla became an adware vendor.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't even remember many times Firefox/Mozilla has changed its extension API and broken everyone's add-ons. It gets tiresome.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago

Mainly once, if you dont count prehistoric versions

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

Changing to opt-out telemetry from opt-in is the one I remember people fussing over

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

I use IronFox because firefox decided to support bad practices. Kinda like google removing "don't be evil".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I have a silly reason! I got a windows phone and loved it, so was happy to use Edge (when it was still its own thing and not effectively Chrome).

Edge's PDF viewer was great, and in general things were speedy, got out the way, and best of all it synced bookmarks to my phone. :) I also liked the rewards system for using bing, and between microsoft and google, I regarded google as worse ethically. (Obviously... yeah not a solid argument)

I think I switched back to firefox and variants mainly because I started caring about my data, open-source, and also those advantages Edge had were eroding in real-time, with adverts, nagging, and Windows things creeping in - the rewards ended, the chrome thing, it started feeling like the IE days again.

One of my coworkers uses it still, and it pains me to see what new AI gimmick is being shoehorned in.

If I stopped for dumb reasons, I like to think I came back wiser for it. :)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

There was some uproar when they essentially de-committed to supporting MDN/developer tools in 2020

...we are reducing investment in some areas such as developer tools, internal tooling, and platform feature development, and transitioning adjacent security/privacy products to our New Products and Operations team...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

A: Not all of us did.

2: It sucked for a while, performance went down the toilet till they rewrote the engine in quantum.

Honestly threading was horrible for a decade there, while chrome had multi-processes running solid, even extensions didn't kill it, even if it burned 500gb ram to browse bash.org.

Experiments were bad too, but you could shut those off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Probably

I didn't though, because the alternative would either be very small browsers with no or very limited addon support, or FF forks. And until now, everything Mozilla added was either opt-in or very easy opt-out. So hopping wouldn't change much for me, except that there's no LibreWolf nightly, and I doubt that self-compiled addons work there consistently.

load more comments
view more: next ›