JubilantJaguar

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

Sure, it's fine. But if I'm only publishing text and photos, and I don't need tons of specialized plugins, and I'm dealing with things myself - then personally I will go with a static-site generator every time. It's at least as fast, and more secure by design.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago

Did not know that. Useful.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Full DB-driven monster for a few bytes of text. Sledgehammer to crack a nut if you ask me. But sure, this is the obvious answer.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

Even more interesting IMO: what are the options that do not involve self-hosting (thus avoiding the PITA of babysitting a domain and server security)?

 

SHANGHAI — After unusually warm weather descended on eastern China earlier this week, Shanghai residents dodged the sun’s rays by extending their annual sakura photo shoots well into the night.

The result was an almost-carnivalesque atmosphere that could be felt across the city.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

The basic argument here is that instead of talking about degrowth and sacrifice (regardless of their necessity), we should rather focus on the positive agenda of wellbeing, which stands a better chance politically. I find the argument convincing.

Listening recommendation: Club of Rome podcast. High quality discussions, unfortunately very irregular episodes. The author was a guest on several of them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yes, that's what they meant. I thought the factoid was quite well-known by now.

Economic growth is becoming decoupled from resource use. The problem is that it's agonizingly slow, so that the decoupling remains stubbornly relative: the resource throughput is still going up, just less quickly. The holy grail is absolute decoupling. No sign of that in sight, notwithstanding optimistic predictions about "green growth". This lack of actual progress is the main argument for dumping growth as an indicator.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

And this too is a lazy outdated stereotype.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

And "little red" in Italian. Or pettirosso, which sounds simultaneously cute and like a badass Ferrari.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The fact that you don't even know is exactly what I'm talking about. It's peak - the regulation is pretty clear that you can't just put a button "Push this to comply", the motor must not be capable of outputting more than 250W. Or else stay off the public road, sidewalk included.

It seems that hardly anybody cares because there's all but no enforcement in most countries. But as I understand it from much sleuthing, there's been some cracking down in some places, notably France. So who's to say what's coming next year? Personally I'm not wasting a thousand euro if it's to get pulled over and fined, or to get in trouble trying to cross a border while touring, or (worst of all) to find that I'm uninsured in an accident.

And now this about trains. Hardly surprising there's gonna be problem if people are trying to pass off 1kW motorbikes as ebikes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Looks like rail companies are starting to ban

If this is true, it will be an own goal for sustainability. I for one will be mighty pissed off and will try to do something about it.

A related issue here is the EU's 250W motor limit for ebikes, which means that even a 400W ebike is completely illegal on a public road without a motorbike registration. From what I can tell, most of the ebike companies are either pretending this rule doesn't exist, or obfuscating about it, or putting in switches to throttle the motor to 250W and magically make the thing "legal". I am looking to buy an ebike - which I will attempt to take on a train - and this whole issue is driving me to distraction.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago

Bro doesn't need DE to watch videos. Bro doesn't need DE to do anything.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Most laptops will be more or less fully compatible

If by "most" you mean only the ones over 500 bucks. Chromebooks have almost completely taken over the bottom end of the market (which is more than adequate if you're not gaming) and Chromebooks are not compatible with Linux unless you enjoy getting your hands very dirty.

15
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/27088982

This book is creating quite a buzz. See the basics and one review among many.

People being what they are, there's no doubt that this is an election-winning agenda for the Democrats. And the authors are both very serious people. I'm reluctant to write off Ezra Klein, who IMO is not just very smart but also circumspect and fair-minded.

But all this also looks to me like an advanced case of deluded wishful thinking. Or of "cornucopian economics", as EO Wilson called it.

What to conclude?

 

This book is creating quite a buzz. See the basics and one review among many.

People being what they are, there's no doubt that this is an election-winning agenda for the Democrats. And the authors are both very serious people. I'm reluctant to write off Ezra Klein, who IMO is not just very smart but also circumspect and fair-minded.

But all this also looks to me like an advanced case of deluded wishful thinking. Or of "cornucopian economics", as EO Wilson called it.

What to conclude?

 
  • New research concludes that humanity would benefit more if it aims for ecological sustainability and stays within the limits of what Earth can provide, rather than pursuing relentless growth.
  • The success of capitalism depends on the push for growth, which requires the use of resources and energy, and comes at the cost of ecological damage.
  • Economists have proposed alternatives that focus on staying within a set of planetary boundaries that define the safe operating space for humanity.
  • The review, published in the journal Lancet Planetary Health, draws on more than 200 resources from the scientific literature.
 

This one really did happen in the shower.

 

Banks, email providers, booking sites, e-commerce, basically anything where money is involved, it's always the same experience. If you use the Android or iOS app, you stayed signed in indefinitely. If you use a web browser, you get signed out and asked to re-authenticate constantly - and often you have to do it painfully using a 2FA factor.

For either of my banks, if I use their crappy Android app all I have to do is input a short PIN to get access. But in Firefox I also get signed out after about 10 minutes without interaction and have to enter full credentials again to get back in - and, naturally, they conceal the user ID field from the login manager to be extra annoying.

For a couple of other services (also involving money) it's 2FA all the way. Literally no means of staying signed in on a desktop browser more than a single session - presumably defined as 30 minutes or whatever. Haven't tried their own crappy mobile apps but I doubt very much it is such a bad experience.

Who else is being driven crazy by this? How is there any technical justification for this discrimination? Browsers store login tokens just like blackbox spyware on Android-iOS, there is nothing to stop you staying signed in indefinitely. The standard justification seems to be that web browsers are less secure than mobile apps - is there any merit at all to this argument?

Or is all this just a blatant scam to push people to install privacy-destroying spyware apps on privacy-destroying spyware OSs, thus helping to further undermine the most privacy-respecting software platform we have: the web.

If so, could a legal challenge be mounted using the latest EU rules? Maybe it's time for Open Web Advocacy to get on the case.

Thoughts appreciated.

view more: next ›