this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
28 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

2335 readers
304 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The global rush to AI technology will require almost as much energy by 2030 as Japan uses today. One data center today consumes as much electricity as 100,000 households, but some of those currently under construction will require 20 times more.

Processing data, mainly for AI, will consume more electricity in the US alone than manufacturing steel, cement, chemicals and all other energy-intensive goods combined, according to a report from the International Energy Agency.

AI has the potential to reverse all the gains made in recent years in advanced economies to reduce their energy use, mainly through efficiencies. The rapid increase in AI also means companies will seek the most readily available energy – which could come from gas plants, which were on their way out in many developed countries. In the US, the demand could even be met by coal-fired power stations being given a new lease on life, aided by Donald Trump’s enthusiasm for them.

https://archive.ph/n4xyL

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ecological mass destruction so losers can rip artists off

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

So much energy wasted for half ass knock offs and unreliable searches.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

US taxpayer is already subsidized some of these projects and going to pay even more going forward.

Private capital can't be bothered to do its own CapEx

All of this while the rate payers will generally subsidize the industry

We pay for everything for them while they keep all of the profit and the normie thinks this is fine 🤡

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Quadruple in 10 years? That seems kinda slow.

Oh… OOOOOOOOOHHHhhhh

Fuck.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Fears that the rapid adoption of AI will destroy hopes of tackling the climate crisis have been “overstated”, according to the report, which was published on Thursday. That is because harnessing AI to make energy use and other activities more efficient could result in savings that reduce greenhouse gas emissions overall. (Bolded the key word there.)

They go on to list some potential uses for AI, such as improving efficiency in the energy grid & manufacturing (ignoring the fact that increasing efficiency increases consumption), optimizing traffic, finding more critical mineral reserves, etc.

These uses could offset some of the massive demands that AI will place on the world’s energy systems. But that is likely to require greater direction from governments, the IEA report found. Left alone, the rapid growth of AI could prove a severe problem for energy systems and the environment.

Hm, wonder which path we're going to choose.

Claude Turmes, a former Green MEP and energy minister for Luxembourg, said the disadvantages of AI were more likely to materialise than the optimistic projections of the IEA, and governments needed much more help to avoid the pitfalls. He accused the IEA of painting too rosy a picture and failing to spell out harsh truths to policymakers.