this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
539 points (78.2% liked)

Comic Strips

15749 readers
2677 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
539
Safe professions (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Thanks to @[email protected] for finding the original author:

https://www.instagram.com/linhadotrem/

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 69 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Credit to the original artist.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This... Almost looks like the op of this post used AI to translate and change the art style of this comic.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Replaced by AI: ~~traductor~~

Also modified the art style to make it less violent and subversive, so cross "artist" of that list as well.

With the original, we clearly understand that it should all have been filled with humans, but there was a progression in the center line where AI (killed and) replaced professions that were always thought to be irreplaceable by AI.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 days ago

Seems the translated variant misses a big point of the original artist too, notice how the gun slowly comes into view? It's trying to make a point that the replacement isn't quite organic, but rather forced on us. Probably would have been better to just translate the text in place and include the rightful credit.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Ironic. The translator and artist were the first ones to be killed, and now we got this bastardized AI "translation" that's actually an entirely different image, but worse.

This is why so many were confused about "personal," I believe it's a borrowed term in Brazil that popularly means personal trainer.

Not personnel, not HR, not personal assistant, nor an AI hallucination, even as some confidently claimed them, all because the original work was discarded for a shitty alternative, much like workers themselves.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 71 points 6 days ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 84 points 6 days ago

Probably a hallucination of the AI that generated this

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 days ago

The original meme this was copied from is Brazilian:

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 days ago

Any personals here?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 days ago (8 children)

AI hasn't replaced Translators and the attempt to use them to replace artists and journalists isn't going as well as you would assume. AI isn't replacing any skilled position. Anyone who told you it will, is selling you something or dreadfully ignorant on the topic.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Correct. But it has made Translators more productive so we need fewer of them. But the productivity gains will create other jobs and so on. So it's not as clear cut as people think. What will likely happen is that some jobs will vanish (anyone here remember elevator operators?) while some jobs will change and in other cases new professions will be created.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Yeah I find most of the AI art generators are just allowing people who aren't artistic to make their own stuff which they wouldn't have paid someone for anyways if AI wasn't there, they would have just gone without, so it's not really a lose to artists.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (5 children)

I have done professional translation, as a side gig. The usual workflow involves a first run through machine translation (Deepl is my favorite), then opening the machine translation in a translation program (I use CafeTran), which is used to make the second pass, by the human translator. This program doesn't translate (they can use one of the main translation engines) but provides a bunch of tools to make the translation refining process easier.

Pure machine translation is a hack. AI can't grasp nuances, contexts, etc... You will often see many words that may have several meanings, used incorrectly, for example.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 6 days ago (1 children)

People under Capitalism: Oh no, our jobs are being automated. 😱😭

People under Socialism: Finally! Now that our jobs are being automated, I can chill and watch TV, maybe go on a vacation. 😎🏖🍺🎉🎊🎇🎆

~(Btw,~ ~USSR/Russia~ ~and~ ~PRC~ ~are~ ~not~ ~socialist,~ ~don't~ ~get~ ~confused)~

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

But you're living in capitalism. Unless government forces billionaires to fund social programs, they will just keep getting richer, just like it's happening right now (if we ignore the crashing markets, but you get the idea)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago

That’s why we used to tax the morbidly rich at a 90% rate in the 50s

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The rich will always have money to pay better people to make beautiful things for them

Just be useful to the rich and you'll survive

Just like they planned it

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 days ago

I wanted robots to do my menial unpleasant chores for me so I'd have more time to do art, writing, and analytics. I didn't want robots to do all the art, writing, and analytics so I had more time for chores & menial tasks 😭

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 days ago (4 children)

When I see these kinds of posts I just look over at the vibe coders and just laugh harder than any joke about ai taking our jobs

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Meanwhile my (college btw) teacher suggests us to use ChatGPT if we need help. Bro wants to replace himself.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 days ago (7 children)

Everyone thinks their own line of work is safe because everyone knows the nuances of their own job. But the thing that gets you is that the easier a job gets the fewer people are needed and the more replaceable they are. You might not be able to make a robot cashier, but with the scan and go mobile app you only need an employee to wave a scanner (to check that some random items in your cart are included in the barcode on your receipt) and the time per customer to do that is fast enough that you only need one person, and since anyone can wave a scanner you don’t have much leverage to negotiate a raise.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (24 children)

Oh man is translation not possible with AI. You have no idea how little languages have in common. A lot of terms don't mean a thing, but combine concepts you don't have or associate to point at a thing.

My dad said, about learning a new language, ''cat means cat, not gato, don't translate'' and I think that holds up pretty well from my experience.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Cooking is something that requires advanced robotics or some kind of heavily modular factory-like automated meal production line, not AI. Though AI certainly could assist in the development of such.

Drivers are being actively replaced right before our eyes.

A lot of Lawyer work is already being heavily automated, even without AI. Outside of that its "technically" replaceable with AI but on a literal legal level not likely currently possible. I think automating some aspects of being a lawyer might be beneficial but certain elements would be down right dystopian if fully automated.

Doctor work being automated is also already being done, but this is arguably a very good thing, as it maybe holds the key to a lot of medical breakthroughs and might unlock the potential to sort all that personal medical data people collect ever since that became a thing. And largely might help significantly reduce the cost of highly effective personal healthcare, given sufficient time.

Teacher work probably could be partially automated but getting kids to pay attention to a lesson, discipline, safety, etc would likely require a human to be around if only for liability.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The image looks like AI...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago

Makes sense, the artist panel has a robot after all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How safe a profession is depends on how much more expensive replacing robots are than replacing people

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Man itl be nice when surgeons can be fully replaced with robots.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago

There are some thing I would not mind seeing gone, like managers, doctors that don't actually want to treat anyone, and begging a Psych to at least give you an ADHD test.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago

If we were not ruled by tech oligarchs, and the control & benefits of AI were not concentrated among a privileged few, AI replacing our jobs would be a good thing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

I still think that all jobs are, in general, safe for the foreseeable future. But we will be expected to use AI tools and just produce more and more, so that a few people will gain more and more resources and power.

E.g. as engineers we will do less and less actual planning, but we will run AIs like it were a team of engineer slaves.

And I think this will be similar for other branches. A music composer will run AIs to compose parts of a song, adjust it, readjust other parts, till the song is good. I mean, afaik this is already how much of it works.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›