this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
230 points (97.5% liked)

Fuck AI

5765 readers
2153 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] subignition@fedia.io 86 points 3 days ago (4 children)

When the alarm goes off in your building... you evacuate. Doesn't matter if it's a test or not.

[โ€“] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Exactly. It's literally the point of a test.

[โ€“] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's literally the point of a fire drill.

A scheduled test of the equipment, with the alarms going off randomly all day as the tester gets to them, doesn't require you to evacuate.

Such a test is always supposed to be preceded by ample warning notifications, so people will be extra careful not to set real fires while the building is vulnerable.

[โ€“] Hawke@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

And also is supposed to be monitored with people actually watching for fires so they can manually evacuate people if a fire does break out during the test. (Requirements may vary by jurisdiction of course)

[โ€“] NOPper@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago

Read the post, the follow up explains she was already outside at the designated meeting point per policy and just making a Slack thread to talk about it.

[โ€“] Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 days ago

Glad to see this is a top comment.

[โ€“] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well that sounds inconvenient.