Hawke

Got an explanation for that in English?

It seems to predate the Nazis by a large margin (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_gustibus_non_est_disputandum via https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suum_cuique )

Plenty of better reasons to alter UK foreign policy. Starting with “Brexit was a mistake and caused by Russian interference”.

Yeah but the main reason for all those copyright law differences comes down to “greed, money, and control” as the other replies explain.

That’s complete bullshit:

Software I’ve written is owned by me.

Open-source licenses (F/LOSS) mostly cannot be revoked.

Public domain exists.

…never?

ETA can mean “edited to add”

Ah, I meant in the comics themselves. If they want to “advertise” on their page or whatever, more power to them.

This is what I see when I look at warandpeas.com — there’s the name of the comic but nothing that I would call a watermark or an advertisement.

I don’t agree. I just want to know who made the art. Attribution is not the same as advertising.

A Patreon link or a watermark I could see as advertising, but I don’t think I’ve ever seen that directly on a comic image.

Do you have some actual examples?

Do you have some examples of “ads” or watermarks in comics?

IMO artist signatures/names or comic titles are not ads.

A “modern” design, the current trend of shitty suburban layout that seems to be the alternative to the grid layout complained about.

Not better:

“Don’t let the FIN hit you in the ass in the way out!”

I think it’s just a couple of small typos plus some slightly unusual wording.

“If not then why doesn’t one group with their allies move inside.