‘But there is a difference between recognising AI use and proving its use. So I tried an experiment. … I received 122 paper submissions. Of those, the Trojan horse easily identified 33 AI-generated papers. I sent these stats to all the students and gave them the opportunity to admit to using AI before they were locked into failing the class. Another 14 outed themselves. In other words, nearly 39% of the submissions were at least partially written by AI.‘
Article archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20251125225915/https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/set-trap-to-catch-students-cheating-ai_uk_691f20d1e4b00ed8a94f4c01
What the business wants and what they say they want are two completely different things. They still want people to be able to think and solve their own problems, even if they end up assigning the praise for your hard work on the AI you only pretended to use
This is a new pattern that I am seeing. C suite is required to launch AI initiatives because of market expectation, tech staff expected to launder their work through Claude
And literally all of them can fuck right off and fire me before I do that, the only thing keeping me from being fully radicalized against this system is that I am still(just barely) able to afford food and shelter.
I think that most of all they want you to feel like AI could replace you if you misbehave.