this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
164 points (86.0% liked)

Canada

10057 readers
901 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

How to say Marx was right without saying "Marx was right".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CatherineLily@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

So, how long do we have left?

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

The typical Lemming will be poorer but fine, unless it triggers other human disasters like a nuclear exchange. The lower classes of Bangladesh, less so, and 95%+ of coral reefs are fucked.

[–] asg101@lemmy.ca 33 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

No one knows, many humans and other species are already dying from climate change today. Get used to hearing the phrase "It is happening much faster than expected." from now on.

[–] CatherineLily@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Guess people better start updating their plans then. No point in starting a family and having kids when they'll just die to climate change.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

People are doing that. Fertility rates are way below replacement rates. Now billionaires are freaking out that their customer base and work force is shrinking.

[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 hour ago

And the solution is of course outlawing abortions, instead of keeping the planet in a habitable state.

[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 9 hours ago

I am way ahead of you.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 2 points 13 hours ago

I'm curious if we will hit a correctional point when most of life dies off and civilization can restart. I'm picturing some fallout/metro kind of shit where people need to love underground for centuries.

[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

"Collapse is a process, not an event." It's very likely we'll be extinct by the end of the century. There will be all manner of hell from now until then. Our population of over 8 billion is only possible because of a highly complex global web of systems. Complex systems are fragile. Once dominos start falling, people will start starving very quickly.

[–] scintilla@kbin.earth 14 points 12 hours ago

Its entirely possible that 99% of humanity dies but I don't really buy into us going extinct. People have an inate drive to survive and even if things are genuinely horrible I don't see them just giving up. Unless there is literally no food/potable water I think the planet is stuck with some form of humanity until the planet is uninhabitable. Remember there are still dinosaurs around today, they just look different.

[–] teppa@piefed.ca 0 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

This guy says climate change mitigation will be a blip on the radar of economic growth:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfNamRmje-s

[–] belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago

This guy has no fucking clue about human beings and does not give a single shit about human beings. His opinion can be safely discarded

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 hours ago

Hooooly shit, that man is a sociopath. It's no wonder we're barrelling into 5°C with people like him driving the world's economy.

He's done the classic trader thing:

  1. Classify everything based on its financial value
  2. Ignore the real-world implications of things that don't fit his models
  3. Take it as a given that markets will always behave the same way regardless of point 2.