this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
172 points (93.9% liked)
Fuck AI
8774 readers
1241 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
Rules:
- Relevant posts only.
- No bigotry.
- No misinformation.
- No NSFW/NSFL content without being labeled NSFW or being in an appropriately-labeled spoiler tag.
- This isn't a place to talk about the cons and (supposed) pros of AI for different use cases. This is /c/fuck_ai .
- Especially no AI advocacy.
- No AI-generated content. If you want to post examples of AI failing hillariously, there are other communities for that like !ArtificialIgnorance@lemmy.ca .
- Venting is part of the purpose of this community, but don't aim frustration or accusations at other users.
- These rules are a living document that may change in the future.
You can help the mod team by making your reports detailed.
Effective reports:
- "The third image is a well-known anti-semitic trope"
- "Claiming that 'agentic AI' can outperform humans at all jobs is misinformation"
Less effective reports:
- "Breaks rules"
- "Misinformation"
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So what you’re saying is that @Papaskwat@lemmy.today is a dishonest individual?
Cool, fucker is now blocked.
AI has a place but the majority do not know how to use to correctly. Their ignorance is the problem hence they are a problem. :/
Personally, AI slop posters get a tag instead of a block from me so that I can downvote/comment whenever I come across their content.
I quickly got banned for just downvoting the ones I saw come up in my feed.
No, they aren't a dishonest individual.
They are posting AI to an instance where AI is allowed. Nothing dishonest about it.
No, they lie about it too.
https://lemmy.today/comment/25335398
AI being allowed is one thing. If a community wants to allow it then that's their business, I don't care.
AI being unlabeled is quite another and misleading at best. Again, a community may choose to not have this requirement, but that doesn't change the fact that it's misleading.
I do think that unlabeled AI on a federated platform is a little irresponsible, even though the community embraces it. It's not about the rules, it's about whether viewers - many of whom won't be subscribers to the community - are misled into thinking the publications are real.
Are you their best friend, a sock-puppet, or just another intolerable douchecanoe?