Your last point hinges on a false equivalency. Imprisonment is also a crime, but we let the government imprison dangerous people for public safety. It's different when the government does it.
Obviously the death penalty is a different situation, but your logic doesn't hold up in either case.
To be clear, I don't support the death penalty. But people on the Internet seem to hate it when I play devil's advocate to sharpen an argument.
This grill is not a hoooooome.
Use Jujutsu jj and you won't have this problem
Look up Operation Paul Bunyan AKA The Korean Axe Murder Incident
I'm not making a larger claim here, I'm just asking the vegetarians to explain the logic of their belief.
It sounds like now you're saying that you want to reduce pain rather than the killing of intelligent/conscious life.
In that case would you be OK with slaughterhouses if they treated the animals humanely and killed them as quickly as possible before they could feel significant pain?
You're so right. I guess it doesn't matter what happens between now and the inevitable future. -_-
It is in my country.
Did you read the comment I replied to?
For me there's no morals tied to the level of consciousness. That allows for cherry picking.
No I wouldn't. But I would kill and eat an insect, fish, or bird.
Ok but plants are also living beings so you should not eat them by your rule.
How is it not? The most popular GPT models are trained on copyrighted works.
I recently attended a Beyblade birthday party and it was rad.