this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
382 points (97.3% liked)

News

35749 readers
2010 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump refused to rule out seeking a third term as president, telling NBC News there are “methods” to do so and emphasizing, “I’m not joking.”

Though the 22nd Amendment bars presidents from serving more than two terms, Trump suggested possible workarounds, including a VP succession plan.

He cited strong poll support and added, “a lot of people want me to do it.”

Allies like Rep. Andy Ogles and Steve Bannon back the idea. Amending term limits would require a complex constitutional process.

all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 113 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The American people have "methods" to remove him should he ever attempt this. And they won't be "joking" either.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 78 points 10 months ago

I really want to believe you

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (3 children)

No they don't. There's already been multiple failed attempts on his life. People have tired your methods. He has helicopter to get away from the hoards.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 53 points 10 months ago (3 children)

While I agree that its unlikely for him to go out that way, failed attempts dont make the chance zero. The people trying that only have to get lucky once, he has to avoid being unlucky every time.

[–] teft@lemmy.world 43 points 10 months ago

failed attempts dont make the chance zero.

"Today, we were unlucky. But remember, we only have to be lucky once — you have to be lucky always"

Statement from the IRA to Margaret Thatcher after they nearly assassinated her with a bomb.

[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hitler had a lot of failed assassination attempts too

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago

But someone still got him shot.. oh, wait!

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 21 points 10 months ago

There was one. And it was just a kid who almost accomplished it.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

He would have to go out to his beloved rallies, he will expose himself because he thinks he's invincible. He will make a mistake and a good marksman will not miss.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Nice fantasy. But that's all it is. He'll have bullet proof glass, weapons aren't allowed at his rallies. You don't think people tried this with Hitler, Stalin, and Putin? It's said there were over 600 attempts on Castro's life. He died of old age.

Hell, people tried it with Nixon, Regan, and Obama, people try these things all the time.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No glass in Pennsylvania. No weapons allowed either. And yet, he was inches away.

[–] bomibantai@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Lol the American people drive around decrepit cities and believe they live in the best country in the world, while people in Michigan have water that looks like nesquick. Dumbass

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 73 points 10 months ago (3 children)

He cited strong poll support and added, “a lot of people want me to do it.”

A lot of people would like to have Obama back, too. It's weird how these monsters want to set up a specific scenario where Obama cannot run again, but donvict can.

That's weird.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Your last name must start with the first 4 letters T-R-U-M and you must be the most beautiful white man ever known, everyone says so.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I'm betting far more people want to see Trump strung up by his ankles, maybe he should bow to pressure there as well.

[–] sporkler@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I think he should attack Greenland.

Hell, I'd even let him take a pair of chopsticks with him, if he can fit it in his kayak.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 41 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

That’s the 12th amendment. No, he can’t run for VP and let the POTUS quit

The only legal method of doing this would be repealing the 22nd amendment.

Also, he’ll be dead by then. He’s obese and almost 80.

[–] zildjiandrummer1@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago (2 children)

How have we gotten to the point of just hoping his poor health will solve this problem? Assassination is crazy and shouldn't be a solution to anything, but I just wish the whole country was not as brainwashed/apathetic to avoid this problem in the first place.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 8 points 10 months ago

I wouldn't call it crazy at this point.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There’s not really anything you can do besides vote. That and protest

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

You can watch Winter on Fire

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

There's no doubt the 22nd Amendment would disqualify him, the only question is what happens when he's disqualified? If the Supreme Court goes the same direction the majority went on the Colorado ballot case, they'd say it's up to Congress to enforce it. Now there's good reason for assuming they won't say the same exact thing here, but the same cop-out instinct that the 6 Republicans have had with Trump will still be there. Maybe they'll just say it's up to the voters to not elect him again and leave it at that.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

The 22nd amendment was written poorly, and prohibits someone from being elected into the office.

Terrifying fact: the Speaker of the House is third in line, and doesn't actually have to be a member of Congress. If the VP and President both leave office without a new VP being appointed, the Speaker of the House assumes the Presidency, bypassing both the 12th and 22nd amendments.

[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

He'll start a war, internally or externally and use that as an excuse to block elections. Probably takes Zelenski as an example, no elections during wartime...

Or he'll do a Putin, all election preparations go into a blender, real opponents are disqualified for arbitrary reasons, force his own name on the ballot then declare himself a winner.

Or... as he keeps throwing around, make sure there is voter fraud, hide it 'till it leaks then just proclaim the win/fraudulent elections and stay in power.

[–] bluegreenwookie@bookwormstory.social 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't believe the us has what Ukraine has. Could be wrong but i dont think elections can be suspended during wartime. He also doesn't have the power to declare war. It's why the us hasn't technically been in a war since ww2 or korea (I forget what the last official war was)

However it is looking like he is trying already to throw the election process out the window. Likely so it's easier to rig would be my guess

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The issue in Ukraine is twofold.

The country is under martial law, which forbids elections and 20% of the country's electorate is under foreign occupation in wartime. Thus poisoning any election result because 1/5th of the territory's people didnt get to vote.

the US presumably, would not have the second problem

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

“Presumably” is carrying that sentence.

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

The only scenario where US territory comes under occupation is one where the US is in complete and total anarchy, where their Navy isnt stopping European, Chinese, or Russian forces from landing on its own shores. Any other scenario, North America is safe from Overseas invasion.

even in a war scenario, Mexico and Canada aren't going to try to occupy American territory.

I suppose the only other scenario would be if there was a successionist movement that tried to leave the Union.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

true, there is the Maduro Method, Putin Method, Orban Method, Erdogan, Jinping....

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There are "legal" methods for doing anything. The question is if it is ethical, sane, not authoritarian.

I sincerely hope he dies of a McDonalds coronary today.

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 1 points 10 months ago

Only better day than today is yesterday!

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It was a poll conducted using the same process by which he declassified those documents in his bathroom at Mar-a-lago.

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

It looks like some asshole needs a little more attention.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

He doesn't have to rule it out. We already have

[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

What methods? Besides using the Constitution as a toilet paper…and ignoring it. Oh…

[–] PointyReality@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Discovered this the other day and this article made me think of it again. Enjoy.

https://youtu.be/PyDb3zNH3q0

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

It's cloning, isn't it?