News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
No they don't. There's already been multiple failed attempts on his life. People have tired your methods. He has helicopter to get away from the hoards.
While I agree that its unlikely for him to go out that way, failed attempts dont make the chance zero. The people trying that only have to get lucky once, he has to avoid being unlucky every time.
"Today, we were unlucky. But remember, we only have to be lucky once — you have to be lucky always"
Statement from the IRA to Margaret Thatcher after they nearly assassinated her with a bomb.
Hitler had a lot of failed assassination attempts too
But someone still got him shot.. oh, wait!
It's always a first time assassin, incompetent enough to think it's possible vs a team of professionals trained in the prevention of such events, who are part of a long lived organisation focused on that task alone.
The secret service are dedicated en mass to stopping such events and have been successful the majority of times.
No the chance is not zero, but it's near enough. You're welcome to put that to the test. But you'd be better off doing a historical analysis of modern era coups.
Start with something like this video:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rStL7niR7gs&list=PLrttDbiWQ1XO1iHAszAsPobYSoR0uQg_1&index=1&pp=iAQB
P.S Oh right, it's easier to fantasize about someone else doing an assassination for you. Putting JD Vance in charge. Nice clean and simple fantasy.
The secret service didn't know (or didn't care) there was a shooter until after the guy clipped the ear. They failed at the prevention part of their job.
edit: all I'm saying is if they failed once, they could fail again. That's it. I myself have no intentions of ever setting foot in the states.
That wasn't the secret service, it was the PA police. But sure roll up and take your shot already if you think it's easy.
https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/07/statement-us-secret-service-director-kimberly-cheatle
Yes, AFTER the fact. But before that, the area was the charge of PA police.
They were both there, and thought he was working for the other group
Part of the reason apparently was the venue made demands to have a police perimeter, and the campaign was having trouble find a venue in the area.
There was one. And it was just a kid who almost accomplished it.
He would have to go out to his beloved rallies, he will expose himself because he thinks he's invincible. He will make a mistake and a good marksman will not miss.
Nice fantasy. But that's all it is. He'll have bullet proof glass, weapons aren't allowed at his rallies. You don't think people tried this with Hitler, Stalin, and Putin? It's said there were over 600 attempts on Castro's life. He died of old age.
Hell, people tried it with Nixon, Regan, and Obama, people try these things all the time.
No glass in Pennsylvania. No weapons allowed either. And yet, he was inches away.
Inches count. How'd the shooter fair? He still kicking? But also, candidate Trump was just a candidate then. More events back then meant less planning, with worse personnel.
He's not having that rapid stream of events to attend these days. They get more planning if there are fewer big public events, and it's the Secret Service's presidential agents protecting him now.
....what's the end game anyways? Putting Peter Thiel's avatar in charge?