this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
313 points (93.4% liked)

196

233 readers
28 users here now

Furry version of 196 on pawb.social.

Icon Made by @rose_eye@lemmy.blahaj.zone. Thank you very much.

Post before you leave

Try to make it furry related.

For more general shitposting (not just furry-related) please check out ǃ196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 110 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Are we censoring “dumb” but not “damn” now?

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 79 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

No, fuck *** ***** ** *** cunt!

[–] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago

maybe a japanese model?

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Just the tip.

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To be fair damn is not offensive where as dumb was used to label disabled people and then used as a generally derogatory term. I’d rather censor dumb than damn.

Overall, we use Mute not Dumb for quite a while now, and so those saying dumb to mean stupid generally are not conflating mute with stupid, so I don’t think it’s worth fighting people over. Just vocab that shifted, even if it had a derogatory connotation at the start, being this far removed from it it’s just too late to bother.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (3 children)

But does censoring a letter change anything? Does reading f*ck read any different to fuck? Does the reader get more or less offense from it?

Censorship doesn’t really seem to accomplish much and if anything draws extra attention to the censored word. I wouldn’t have given it a second thought without it.

Who’s benefiting?

[–] Cornflake@pawb.social 6 points 1 month ago

Frankly, I think single-letter censoring like that is silly. It really doesn't achieve anything and nobody benefits from it

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think the reasoning is that if it's censored, it's an acknowledgement from whoever did so that "this word isn't appropriate in this context, but the text is worth sharing"

[–] Cornflake@pawb.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's probably the reason it's been censored, but I didn't take the original screengrab so I'm not sure

[–] cadekat@pawb.social 5 points 1 month ago

The tip of the gun also appears censored. This is probably some misguided attempt to appease some algorithm somewhere.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Usually this is because they are posting to social media and many social media environments use OCR to scan screenshots for "offensive" words. If the scanner finds something it deems unacceptable, the post will get a smaller audience or might even be disallowed.

The censoring is for the machines, not the people.

edit: Fixed autocorrect.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 87 points 1 month ago

This is not normal.

No one should drive a Jeep.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 49 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Fursuits are so expensive because of all the Ironman-like tech that goes into them. Of course they outshoot everyone when they have HUDs with targeting servos to control their arm movement. I thought everyone knew this.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Engineer friend once talked for 30 minutes about fursuit cooling and how mouth hinges work.

Dude isn't even a furry, it was pure love of the game.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Dude isn't even a furry

Mhmm. And do they go to conventions often but never invite you? Have a secret basement? Are a DBA?

[–] match@pawb.social 5 points 1 month ago

have a paw sticker on their laptop but do not in fact own a dog?

[–] dukeofdummies@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Genuinely they are fascinating. I do cosplay and I have gotten a lot ideas and pointers from furries.

They've solved so much in literally the worst case scenario, it's foolish NOT to do research on them.

[–] Anarki_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 49 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You don't need to censor "dumb". It's okay.

[–] subignition@fedia.io 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Aw h*ck. This kind of single letter censorship is typically done as a joke.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] subignition@fedia.io 5 points 1 month ago

Why would I have meant Jake? This thread doesn't have anything to do with State Farm

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That tracks because "half of the range" is inept Meal Team Six material?

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

lol I’ve heard of Gravy Seal, but Meal Team Six is new to me. Nice.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

He said I should make my motto Sember Pie, then told me to 'relax'.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

Stop this horseshit. You only see the fatasses because that's what the internet thinks is funny. You don't see what I see IRL.

But hey, if you want to continue seeing them as no threat, you do you. I'm armed and train every week, at the least, but there's only so much I can do against the inevitable Red Shirts.

[–] match@pawb.social 21 points 1 month ago

suiters: i need a handler because my field of vision is 20° 🥺

also suiters:

[–] Gustephan@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Checks out. I don't know a ton of furries but all of the ones I do know are armedqueers types

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wherever furries show up, they always seem to represent the most capable subsection of whatever it is they're about - shooting, SysAdmining, fucking, etc. Some of this may be confirmation bias as I also don't know many furries, but....

At this point you should just include a headshot of a fursuit with your resume to bag a job.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

An event I went to recently had an issue with an unknown number of "orphaned radioactive sources" being left on the trade tables. Luckily, one of the furries in attendance has a gigercounter with them. They confirmed that the sources were radioactive, and did a sweep of the camp to make sure no one had taken any away. They also had the contacts to properly dispose of them.

You can therefore add nuclear energy to your list of areas with competent furries.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

An event I went to recently had an issue with an unknown number of "orphaned radioactive sources" being left on the trade tables.

What the hell kind of event was this? People were just leaving radioactive shit lying around? Someone had a Geiger counter on them? WTF!

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

EMF Camp. Its a geeky festival. It had a trade table. Basically bring geeky 'junk' to donate. If you find something you like, donate what you think it is worth and take it. Money goes to charity.

The furry worked for nuclear energy. When someone recognised what the objects might be, someone let him know. He had some of his work kit with him. It was several small sources, similar to those used in schools etc. Not actually that harmful when used properly, and not broken. They put out just enough for it to be worth a sweep to check for more out on the camp. Thankfully no one seemed to have taken any.

In the culprit's defence. It wasn't on the prohibited item list, though that was soon corrected.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Spent the time to print this out, yet "orphanded".

Interesting story though.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

"that was soon corrected"

I get the feeling the sign may have been from later in the event, or a later iteration of the event.

[–] dukeofdummies@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

All the ones I've met have always been super nice and all work in some form of IT.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’ve heard the IT thing so many times that, in my mind, it’s moving from stereotype to reasonable probability

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's a neurodivergent magnet

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Oh that explains so, so much.

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Would a range allow costumes that big? I feel like showing up with a paper Halloween mask would get you kicked out.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago

Probs, but this was specifically an unsupervised one.

[–] Gustephan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I mean, I'd imagine it's no worse than training with a gas mask, and I've never seen somebody kicked out of a range for that