this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
266 points (94.9% liked)

News

35915 readers
3224 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 81 points 1 year ago (5 children)

As a bisexual you're welcome I guess

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Both your parts.

[–] Setiyeti93@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

Oh I'm.sure there are plenty of us. Still hiding. Sadly

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are we still considered "greedy" by both straight and gay people?

[–] frezik@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago

I swear, not all of us are sluts. I am, but not all of us.

[–] pogmommy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago

Thank you for your service 🫡

[–] FanBlade@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank you for your service 🫡

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] hoppolito@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Huh, what app is it that shoves adverts into browsing Lemmy?

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 63 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And how many americans now identify as nazis? Asking for the entire world...

[–] TransSynthesist@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

~10% of Americans are LGBTQ+. ~22.6% of the US population voted for Trump in the most recent election.

[–] stetech@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is voting participation that low?!

Well, you gotta consider everyone under 17yo can't vote, and then, there's all the people in prison and all the other disenfranchised citizens who have had their voting rights stripped by conservatives.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

that figure must be of the overall population.

63.7% overall voter turnout nationwide in 2024.

five states with the highest turnout were:

Minnesota (76.4%), Wisconsin (76.40%), Michigan (74.7%), New Hampshire (74.4%), and Colorado (73.1%).

2020 was the highest nationwide at 66.6%.

more numbers at ballotpedia

[–] stetech@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Right, that makes sense, thank you.

that figure must be of the overall population.

I’d thought so, but forgot there’s actually people who cannot vote (shocker), so in my mind I went “okay, near-70% turnout, so why didn’t he get closer to 35% rather than 20?”… but this in addition to the turnout this time being lower than I remembered makes waaaay more sense, lol.

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (18 children)

And tens of millions of americans just didn't care enough to vote. That was basically saying they are fine with a pedo-rapist who previously attack the captitol win the election. Nazi-enablers.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I could have sworn I read somewhere that it's likely 10% anyway, like 20 years ago. That was the scientific estimate of the time, although I don't though it included the same definition.

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That was an estimate. Around that time only about 2-4% identified as gay but it was estimated the real number was higher because homophobia kept most people in the closet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

i vaguely remember a health teacher in jr or sr high saying something like that (this would be back in the '80s).. "about 10 percent, that's the same as at least three of your classmates.." (in that class)....

and then the students kinda all looked around, eyeballin' everybody.. as if they were counting.. yup. checks out. one of them blurted out "that's kinda low, don'cha think?" --this bit is why i remember the class. and she was right. it was low.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree. It's really hard to count since so many people love in denial. Bisexual is particularly hard to count, and there's plenty of women who fancy the idea given just how awful men are sometimes.

Edit but not really, but I like "love in denial". Happy typo I'm keeping.

[–] Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks for saying this. There's literally a gay sex shop called One in Ten in my city, for this reason, that's been around forever.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

There was a radio show in Boston for the gay and lesbian community 30 years ago called 1 in 10.

[–] 58008@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

1-in-10 has been the stat for decades.

Right? I remember a couple decades ago when things just started opening up for lgbtq people that scientists studying sexuality gave estimates that 1:10 people were likely not going to fit the hetero “norm”.

Looks like they nailed it.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just saw someone right here on Lemmy in another thread conflating sexuality with sex.

It astounds me that in 2025 people don't understand that sexuality is about attraction. You can be a virgin. You can be asexual and still attracted to people of your own gender. You can be gay or bi or whatever regardless of how much or how little sex you've ever had.

[–] straightjorkin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Because a lot of the traditional hetero relationships that Christians have are only different from their other relationships because of the sex. They don't get an emotional and spiritual connection in their relationship, and protect on to others that it's the same.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The thing that always amazes me about those that oppose LGBT is that LGBT is literally about the freedom to love egoevrt you want to love, including loving yourself how you are.

Those that hate LGBT just can't stop talking about hate and spite.

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think in some/most cases it is psychological projection, and in others it’s fear of the unknown. People either are secretly LGBT and hate themselves, or their brains just can’t comprehend the fact that some people are attracted to other genders.

[–] straightjorkin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's projection that they think relationships are only about sex because their hetero relationships are only about sex and devoid of the spiritual and emotional connections that SHOULD exist in a relationship

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those that hate LGBT just can't stop talking about hate and spite.

Don't forget their weird obsession with the genitals of complete strangers. It consumes their ability to ponder things that matter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheGoddessAnoia@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Being old, I recall in the 1990s the number of Americans identifying as homosexual or bisexual was published as either 7% or 8% of the population. I was involved in the arts, where our group estimate was, with a lot of people were still closetted, the real percentage would be closer to 12% to 15%. Reading this and considering the way the US has gone since then, I think we were probably right, and I'd even go so far as to say perhaps a little low.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was involved in the arts

I mean….

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 year ago

Is "Thanks Bisexuals" the new "Thanks Obama"? I hope so.

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago

Hell yeah dude, bisexuals doing our part to get those numbers up.

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

You are welcome, us bisexuals have done our best to infect more people to raise the numbers.

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are GenZ now LGBTQ? LGBTQZ!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DashboTreeFrog@discuss.online 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Feel like the wording of this headline implies that all Gen Z is LGBTQ+

Not saying that would be a bad thing to be clear

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

No, but I remember seeing another recent poll about a year ago where the results were that about 20% of GenZ identify as LGBTQ.

This would imply that 10% is the acceptance rate (which has gone up "thanks to GenZ's contribution") and the actual rate is higher than this, but that part is missing from the information.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

All girls wanna do is lie, be gay, and eat hot chip

[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I’m doing my part!

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

1 in 10? Those are rookie numbers! We gotta pump those numbers up!

load more comments
view more: next ›