this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
11 points (82.4% liked)

Asklemmy

47537 readers
744 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

health insurance != healthcare

health insurance profits only exist at the expense of human suffering.

but lets make sure everyone has insurance but not care

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Copyright is far too long and should only last at most 20 years.

Actually, George Washington would agree with me if he was still alive. He and the other founding fathers created the notion of copyright, which was to last 14 years. Then big corporations changed the laws in their favor.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Myers Briggs is posh astrology.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

People are crazy when they promote closed-source AI (okay, okay, generative model) projects like ChatGPT, Bard etc.

This is literally one of the most important technologies of the future, and after all the times technology companies screwed them (us) up big time and monopolized the Internet, they go into the same trap again and again.

First they surrendered the free Internet, now they surrender the new frontiers.

Wake up, people. Go HuggingFace, advocate for free AI, and ideally - for a GPL one. We cannot afford for this part of our future to be taken away from us.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I pointedly avoid ChatGPT for that reason. When the NovelAI leak happened, it was amazing, and the open ecosystem flourished in response. I just can't believe they call themselves OpenAi.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Ah, that name was left from when they've been open-source, which us why I advocate for the emergence of GPL-licensed projects.

The open-source license for GPT model was very relaxed, which OpenAI took advantage of and, once it could afford their own programmer staff, closed the code with all the contributions all the programmers from all over the world have made.

It's an extremely dick move, and it was repeated by Google, too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Religions are mostly just popularized conspiracy theories. Believing in God is about as realistic as believing the world is flat.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

But it's not about that for many people. For many people, being religious is more about finding strength and peace in that kind of guided spirituality

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And explaining what happens when you die. Which by its very definition nobody alive can know

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

False peace through a false god

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Believe is a powerful thing I would ague even if what you belief is wrong if that belief brings you peace it is not a false peace.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Believing in God is about as realistic as believing the world is flat.

That is a bad comparison IMO. We have piles and piles of hard evidence the Earth is round. Saying the Earth is flat is just factually incorrect at this point.

But the existence of God. I would argue we have no hard evidence of God's existence nor do we have hard evidence that God doesn't exist. As far as science is concerned it is still a theory.

On top of that what makes a god a God there are multiple definitions of a God. If simulation theory is correct and we are all just in a simulation would be people outside of the simulation be our Gods? Or if an extremely advanced civilization existed would they be Gods to us? Or If we as humans advanced enough could we become Gods our self.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I agree with the first sentence, seriously disagree with the second. The shape of the Earth is a testable hypothesis, we have the technology to just go look.

As you go down the rabbit hole of consciousness and existence itself, with a purely rational and materialist mindset, the most reasonable and conservative hypotheses approach the descriptions of deity. Certainly the more specific claims of various religions are as you described, conspiracy theories, but the entire concept? Wholesale dismissal of the generalized God hypothesis strikes me as evidence of rationality applied incompletely, arbitrarily cut short.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Any comment that gets more than one upvote fails the subject.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Upvotes ideally don’t equate to agreement though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I disagree. Lemmy is a very small group of individuals and these type of threads are going to have similar minded people finding eachother. In the grand scheme of things we are next to nothing in scale of the billions of people on this planet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

TikTok and YouTube shorts are brain-rotting garbage, and if you use them regularly you need to stop now. Yes, even if you claim you only watch educational stuff.

Also giving a child under the age of 8 or 9 a personal internet-connected device should be seen on a similar level as neglect if not full-on abuse.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Pitbulls are not more genetically predisposed towards biting or mauling than other breeds and the supposed "statistical data" on the subject is based around a confluence of inaccurate metrics caused by 1) people not being very good at accurately identifying dog breeds, 2) existing groups that hate pitbulls pushing bad statistics for political purposes, and 3) a self-fulfilling prophecy of pitbulls having a bad reputation and actively being sought out by people who want vicious dogs and who will treat their dogs in such a way as to encourage that behavior. And I say all of this as someone who does not own a pitbull and probably never will.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So I think your 3rd point is highly likely, but I do disagree about the genetic predisposition. If it can’t be genetically influenced then goldens are not more friendly than others, and smart dogs (poodles, Australian shepherd, etc.) are not actually smarter; they all have the same genetic predisposition.

Having an aggressive breed is possible, but as I said earlier I think the 3rd point pushes up the numbers of maulings quite a bit. I’d add a 4th point of a lot of people being real shit dog owners and not knowing how to properly raise a dog to be socially capable without harming others.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Teachers should be paid 50% more. If you want good teachers to stay, you have to walk the walk, otherwise you'll get a perpetual cycle of overwhelmed grads being bossed around by rusted-on bottom teer heads.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Piracy equals culture preservation in an age of subscription services.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Copyright should have stayed the original initial 14 years with possible renewal to 28 years. But like in France back then, also include the original authors (last one alive, if several) lifespan. Hence, a copyright would last either the authors lifespans or 28 years, whichever is longer.

Moreover, the patent system is being abused and does not serve the original goal of "any useful art, manufacture, engine, machine, or device, or any improvement there on not before known or used." It granted the applicant the "sole and exclusive right and liberty of making, constructing, using and vending to others to be used" of his invention.. It needs major changes, including the requirement to have the "invention" be under examination by reputable third-party laboratories (such as Intertek, SGI, Underwriters Laboratories, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Technischer Überwachungsverein, SGS - Société Générale de Surveillance, etc…) before being granted a patent. Nowadays, patents are given almost willy-nilly to anyone no matter how vague or obvious the supposed invention.

Nowadays, patents are being misused in Patent Ambush mechanisms and scenarios, meanwhile Patent Trolls and Hoarders whole existence is are to impede/obstruct legally and impose exorbitant levies/fees onto organization and companies actually innovating and developing useful art/process/devices. Even more incredible, there are Submarine Patents being hidden away to suddenly take hostage existing products and process of various companies by imposing extortionate royalties.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What we're currently calling AI isn't AI but just a language processing system that takes its best guess at a response from it's database of information they pilfered from the internet like a more sophisticated Google.

It can't really think for itself and it's answers can be completely wrong. There's nothing intelligent about it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We learn and teach inferior personal computing practice, and most people don't realize how much they are missing.

The vast majority of people outside of enthusiast circles have absolutely no idea what a personal computer is, how it works, what is an operating system, what it does, and how it is supposed to be used. Instead of teaching about shells, sessions, environments, file systems, protocols, standards and Unix philosophy (things that actually make our digital world spin) we teach narrow systems of proprietary walled gardens.

This makes powerful personal computing seem mysterious and intimidating to regular people, so they keep opting out of open infrastructures, preferring everything to come pre-made and pre-configured for them by an exploitative corporation. This lack of education is precisely what makes us so vulnerable to tech hype cycles, software and hardware obsolescence, or just plain shitty products that would have no right to exist in a better world.

This blindness and apathy makes our computing more inaccessible and less sustainable, and it makes us crave things that don't actually deserve our collective attention.

And the most frustrating thing is: proper personal computing is actually not that hard, and it has never been more easy to get into, but no one cares, because getting milked for data is just too convenient for most adults.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Completely agree. Now my hot take for this thread:

If governments some time in the 90s had decided from the start to ban computer hardware from being sold with pre-installed software then we wouldn't have this problem. If everyone had to install their own operating system from scratch, which like you say isn't hard if it's taught, it would have killed the mystery around computing and people would feel ownership over their computers and computing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's no public debt crisis. People don't understand how government debt works. One casualty of this is the slow green transition which will cost us dearly in the future.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The vast majority of humans are actually nice, altruistic and not selfish if you treat them with respect. And hence anarchism would not resolve in everyone killing each other.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Problem is you need more than the “vast majority” to be nice before you feel safe.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

You don't need to get married or have kids to have a happy and fulfilling life

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's no such thing as unskilled labor. Labor is labor, specially if someone else has to do it even if you don't want to.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

People overlook vegetarianism and semi-vegetarian lifestyles as an option too much and it is not helpful that real life examples of vegetarian cultures, get co-opted by Vegans purists as "Vegan cultures" in easily disproven claims- thus hurting the whole movement

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I've had debates with vegans on something similar:
I'm not vegan, I'll never be vegan. That's a complete non-starter for me.

What I have done is reduce my meat intake from 2/sometimes 3 meals a day to 1 meal per day - occasionally (less than once per month) two. Once Lab-grown meat is a viable alternative on cost/taste/texture, I'll be all over that. I still won't be vegan. Even if I reach a point where no animals are harmed from my diet.

I believe it is far easier to convince 1 Million people to do this than it would be to convert 100,000 people to full veganism. A Million people doing this would save Billions more animals per year than 100,000 vegan conversions and maybe even in itself convert a few of those people to full veganism along the way.

They're never interested. It's all or nothing. Black or white. Vegan or Animal killer. They usually have issues with lab grown meat, as well.

It's as though they're a member of an elite club and membership is more important than actually saving animals.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Air fryers are only popular because Americans have been using microwaves to cook for decades, which are possibly the worst cooking devices ever created.

If they had decent fan ovens during that time, they wouldn't be anywhere near as popular

Conversely, air fryers are seen to be popular in the UK, because nobody will admit they fell for the advertising, and now only use them for chips

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Leadership has the capacity and capability to change things for the better and continue to fail to do so because true leadership means making decisions that at times may hurt and may not be universally liked.

This is as true in politics as it is in business.

In short our leaders are not leading out of the fear of repercussions of leading.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Not a single one of the Marvel movies are good. They just use dopaminergic techniques to teach brains to enjoy them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Have you watched the first two Raimi-directed Spiderman movies? I think they stand alone well even for someone that doesn't typically watch superhero movies.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Those math questions that rely on purposeful ambiguity in order to drive engagement are annoying as fuck. It's like "congratulations, you just proved that in math (and questions in general) if you're not clear with what you're asking, people will get different answers". What fantastic value! What a novel hypothesis! Now fucking knock it off. I'm tired of literally everyone screaming about how their way is right when it doesn't fucking matter, the question was asked in a bullshit way in order to piss everyone off.

Bonus, PEMDAS, BEMDAS, PE-MD-AS. It's a goddamn terrible mnemonic that twists itself in knots to make the acronym work, rather than to make the order of operations clear. Screaming it doesn't make your shit any clearer anyways.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Three are also tests where you are expected to think like the person who made the test to figure or what the “correct” answer us. It’s not really correct, but it is the one that gets you the points.

Also some IQ question have several correct answers, but only one of them gives you the points. Super annoying. If you’re creative and smart enough to come up with a logically consistent answer you’re still not guaranteed to get the “correct” answer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Humanity cannot and will not change its practices fast enough to avoid running out of resources we keep ourselves dependent on because it's "profitable." We are a doomed species and won't be around for very much longer. We are likely living in the flash of bright before the long dark. I don't think the world my grandchildren live in will be remotely like the one we have now.

I'm perfectly fine hedging my bets and living life normally, but I think our longevity is an uncomfortable truth most people don't want to face.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The metric system should be redone in base 12, and RPN should be the norm for teaching arithmetic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

RPN is a gateway to LISP

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like base 12 a lot, but Reverse Polish Notation is a mess when you get up to working with polynomials.

With polynomials, you're moving around terms on either side of an equation, and you combine positive terms and negative terms. In essence, there's no such thing as subtraction. (Similarly, division is a lie; you're actually just working with numerators and denominators.)

Reverse Polish Notation makes that a mess since it separates the sign from its term.

Also, RPN draws a distinction between negative values and subtraction, but conceptually there is no subtraction with polynomials, it's all just negative terms. (Or negating a polynomial to get its additive inverse.)

But, yeah. It's a shame we don't use base 12 more.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's super interesting. I adore RPN on caclulators and had never heard any drawbacks well-articulated.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

"Andor" is the best Star Wars series.

load more comments
view more: next ›