This story is getting talked about a lot in Perth this week. A well respected doctor: a week ago was going through a rough patch because he was sad his marriage had broken down. Otherwise had a pretty good life.
Now, through his own stupidity is likely to spend the next several years behind bars. Nobody has any sympathy for him - his high-flying career is likely a thing of the past.
Not that people should need reinforcement on the effects of impaired driving, but yeah - don't do that thing.
Worth mentioning: A young woman a week ago also had a pretty good life going on. Now, she is dead. 😞
I'll start by saying the sauce is questionable. I don't think they're asking an objective question here.
That said, I've never really vibed with the Guardian's writing style. It always feels like I'm reading the opposite of Newscorp's propaganda - but it is still propaganda. I dislike being nudged to think a certain way, even if I'm being nudged in a direction I'd probably be inclined to go anyway. Actually, especially if it's in a direction I'd be inclined to go. Did I come up with this position on my own? Or am I being helped along by some publication with an agenda?
Just give me the bare facts and let me form my own opinions, thanks.
I do love that Guardian Australia exists, however. I love that it has thrown a spanner into the Newscorp near-monopoly on journalism in Australia. I want to see it succeed and stay.