this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
422 points (98.8% liked)

News

37120 readers
1924 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LePoisson@lemmy.world 186 points 1 year ago (6 children)

It's insane to me that this is even a discussion. What kind of evil people would prefer to actively poison their constituents?

It's such a no brainer to remove toxic chemicals from our water supply. Who cares if it's expensive, so is an aircraft carrier, this needs to be done to save lives. We can afford it.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 114 points 1 year ago

Lead poisoning makes people unreasonable and violent.

That's their main demographic.

They're not blind to the fact that lead poisoning helped to get them where they are today.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

Agreed. They are so hell bent on cutting costs and enriching themselves by pinching every penny imaginable that they don't care about any of the consequences or long term effects.

Also, they may even like the side effect of how lead exposure causes cognitive issues and decreases intelligence. Dumber populace is easier to control and manipulate.

These people are psychopaths to their core.

[–] zib@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

It’s such a no brainer

That right there is precisely the point. Lead damages brain function. Their constituents not having functional brains is exactly what keeps them in power.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lead poisoning creates more republican voters. No-brainer for them

[–] harmsy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

No-brainer for them

And for their victims.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are working for our enemies.

They are our enemies.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s back to only thinking about yourself. Most people aren’t currently diagnosed with lead poisoning, so it doesn’t concern them. Why spend all that money.

See also education budgets and international aid

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 109 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lead poisoning is the only way anyone is going to vote for them.

[–] tehWrapper@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Still think you get to vote again?

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

We'll at least pretend.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even North Korea holds elections.

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 1 points 1 year ago

"So, are you voting for Kim or for Labor Camp?"

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 61 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Fuck progress! Anything that even sounds like progressive must go! More lead! More drilling! Mandatory sulfur dioxide exhaust! Make America Acid Rain Again!"

-Fucking greedy lunatics

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s like they studied the fall of Rome and said yes let’s do that

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fun fact: Romans were well aware of lead poisoning and preferred terracotta pipes. When they did use lead they allowed mineral buildup inside the pipes, which shielded the water from the lead itself.

This limestone encrustation (sinter, from the German), which had to be periodically chipped away, suggests that deposits of calcium carbonate in pipes and aqueducts protected against corrosion and insulated against the introduction of lead into the water they conveyed. Too, with no taps to shut off, water flowed continuously and so would not have been in prolonged contact with the metal. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/encyclopaedia_romana/wine/leadpoisoning.html

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They still used lead-based makeup and ate on lead plates.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lead plates are fine as long as you don't eat anything that is both liquid and acidic. Pewter plates (when it was still made with lead) were used until very recently.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Liquid and acidic like garum? The fermented fish sauce the Romans put on pretty much everything?

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Still not much in the grand scheme of things. Smelting lead to extract silver would have been a far greater contributor, especially since it makes the lead airborne as leaded fuel did recently.

[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mix that with a nice dessert wine, and you get garum marsala

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The emperor knew there would be a good reason to start trading with India.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

The key point for the political survival of the Republican party is a stupid voter base. That's why they wreck schools, favor homeschooling by people who might not be suitable for teaching, but have the correct faith, love university fees that leave non-millionaire kids with livelong debts.

Keeping the lead levels high is fully in line with this, as it keeps the population average IQ several points below it's potential.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Smart move! Lead makes the water sweeter! It will encourage people to hydrate!

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I personally prefer my lead sugar in my wine but to each their own.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lead in wine? Interesting.

Hadn’t tried that combo.

I’ve tried lead in paint chips that had a rubbery taste, might have been the paint… Lead on potato chips definitely has a solid taste, even better than sea salt.

[–] hmonkey@lemy.lol 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

When they say they want to go back to the 50s, they mean it

[–] SpatchyIsOnline@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Republicans: Nooooo we can't add flouride to the water supply

Also Republicans: mmm tasty lead

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

These people are working for foreign agents. Explains so much.

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"If you can't beat 'em, make 'em join you"

  • Boomers
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Which is weird, because it was probably their generation that pushed through the end of leaded gasoline.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

The more brain damaged your populace is, the easier it is to control them and have them vote against what is good for them, sonof course Republicans want this

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

They are already brain damaged, so it doesn't impact them.

[–] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago

Some boomer will pipe up saying that they had lead piping in the 50s, say they’re ok, and call this woke.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If someone you know ever struggles to fully understand retaliation and pettiness, point them to these maga/republican freaks. They're so triggered by the existence of people trying to improve things, they'll literally allow more toxic chemicals in things just to own the libs. Literally everyone will suffer because of this: themselves, their voters, their children, everyone.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Make lead mandatory!