this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
541 points (94.4% liked)

News

36063 readers
3048 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kite@sh.itjust.works 103 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Based on my own experience, this is how most cities handle their PD/FD funding, unfortunately. The fire department is just not important.. until it is.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can confirm. source: Am Australian.

[–] Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

I suspect Scott being a doomsday death cult evangelical made those cuts deliberate instead of just being a standard short sighted git. Especially when he decided to take a vacation during your crises.

That's not really how it works in Australia though.

Every property owner pays an Emergency Services Levy which pays for the fireys. State governments pay for the police force. So there's no organisation that chooses whether police or fire gets whatever money - funding is procured separately.

That said, I take your point that the fireys don't get a lot of attention until there's a disaster. That's just human nature I guess.

In my area, if there's a bushfire that looks like destroying someone's house, the volunteers, fire service, and bombing planes are on to it in minutes.

I don't have "data" but from my anecdotal observations they don't seem to be hamstrung by a lack of funding.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 24 points 1 year ago

That's karma. The longer we seek instant gratification, neglecting doing the hard, dirty necessary work that yields no immediate discernable benefits, the more severe the bite is, when it comes back around and bites us in the backside. As a collective, we stay on the wheel of suffering, figure out we need to do something differently, figure out necessary changes, then implement them... Then a few generations, the wealthy overlords convince us we're spending too much on very sensible investments that yield no immediate discernable benefits and we repeat the cycle. It's like Groundhog Day over centuries (which add up to millennia,), rather than days, weeks, years. Because they plan family fortunes for centuries, rather than days, weeks and years, because they can afford private communities, with private police and fire departments, and comprehensive health. The rest of us are means that justify their ends, and the sooner we, as a collective, wake up and smell the roses and love each other enough (which preserves our own arses) to figure out ways to fix this mess, for centuries that turn into millennia, the better off we and the rest of our ecoweb will be. Or not. 🤷‍♀️

[–] resin85@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is incorrect.

the updated budget in November saw a $53 million increase over the previous year once the council took into account the department's unappropriated balance calculation, which provides funds after the budget is approved.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/los-angeles-mayor-karen-bass-pushes-back-criticism/story?id=117512817

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"No they didn't, it was only a budget cut until the unions fought them and forced them to hand over more budget' isn't exactly the win you think it is here.

Even worse, despite call numbers increasing over 5x from 1960, the fire program has been completely unable to expand since 1960 and was basically completely at the mercy of people doing brutal amounts of overtime to keep things going... until they lost the ability to pay them overtime too! The fire department is absurdly understaffed and underfunded. Imagine still making the same salary as 65 years ago, while having to do 5x the work!

While the 53 million budget increase the unions managed to grab is a good improvement, along with the ~200 more trainee firefighters it allowed them to hire but aren't yet ready to deploy, it's the definition of too little and too late.

High winds preventing firefighting planes and copters, low water levels since the city has let nestle steal all of it for free, electrical problems to prevent pumps from sending water from afar, and not enough man hours to manage and prevent fire conditions in the first place- as it says in the article you posted, no amount of budget could have prevented this, because there was more to play here than just the budget. But enough people and man hours to properly manage things would have done a lot to limit the scope of the disaster.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 year ago (4 children)

From my understanding the water towers had completely ran out of water and pumps couldn't keep up. There's was no issue with volume through the existing water system, there's just no way to contain a fire that big. They should be taking preventative measures such as raking the forest.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can't tell if this is idiocy or peak satire.

Well done.

[–] Thteven@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh it's even better than that. They're referencing a direct quote from trump.

https://youtu.be/7CGQv8IDAWw

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was aware of that, but thank you for providing context!

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 1 year ago

I was not. Sounded reasonable except the raking part, from someone who knows fuck all about forest fires or building in fire prone areas.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 year ago

Meh, same thing with healthcare. Who needs a medical professional to help a person with a mental health crisis when you can have a guy with highschool and six months of "training" put a few bullets in em?

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 year ago

America: Funding cops to shoot black people, defunding actual helpful social needs since 1864.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least a bunch of rich fucks in Malibu and Pacific Palisades are paying the price for it.

Doesn't help the lungs and bronchial passages of people with asthma and other breathing issues though. A lot of people will die who were nowhere near the fires.

[–] skhayfa@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

LAPD cops can shout and order the fires to freeze!

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

They could also shoot it if it does not obey!

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I have to do other people's jobs. Slap some tin foil on em and throw them in to help.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Maybe if they all shoot the fire in the back when it's sleeping?!

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

They cut ~2% of the budget. Anyone spewing this funding cut bullshit is a partisan hack.

Quit being reactionary.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do you think it's okay to cut funding to the fire department while keeping the police(gang) force that is notorious for not actually doing anything to help it's citizens?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago

I suspect they could have doubled the budget and they still wouldn't be able to control those fires.

Still it looks like it's affecting rich people, so something will probably get done about it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Just give firefighting responsibility to the cops! Then they can show up to your kitchen fire, put it out, shoot your dog, and arrest you for complaining all in one trip!

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Given the history of wildfires in California, someone has anti-survival traits.

[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fire is a natural part of the ecological system. You can by time, but eventually, it will happen. Building in wildlands is a recipe for disaster, if you don't create breaks, or defencable zones. It's not a simple problem, with a simple solution. A big part of the problem, is building all those homes there, but if you're gonna build, then you should protect. A lot of people build in forested areas and don't create defensible zones, because, that's why they move there, for pretty trees.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›