this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2026
1046 points (99.5% liked)

science

29877 readers
412 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/54245880

The U.S. war with Iran has raised fossil fuel prices so much that the resulting drop in oil demand has put the world on track to see a rare dip in carbon emissions from these sources in 2026.

Between 2019 and 2025, carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels grew by about 0.8 percent annually, according to a new study published in Nature Climate Change. But 2026 is set to buck that trend: high oil prices, as well as the continued rise of green technology—solar power, wind and electric cars—will cause a “short-term” 0.4 percent drop, according to the study.

“The high petrol prices following the war in Iran are reducing oil use and keeping emissions low,” says the study’s lead author Corinne Le Quéré, a professor of climate change science at the University of East Anglia in England. “But that’s not the whole story: The expansion of renewable energy has progressed a lot in recent years, led by China. And [along with electric vehicles], this is offsetting two thirds of the growing demand for energy.”

With all sources of carbon considered, including deforestation, total global CO2 emissions are set to continue increasing.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't tease me. I once told my very conservative friend that I wanted to see the gas prices skyrocket, and he was dumbfounded at why I would want that. And my answer was exactly this, its the only reason people will stop using fossil fuels.

We've proven that people don't care about climate change unless it affects them directly.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This is why no US president has fucked with Iran in a meaningful way, until Dementia Don thought he could Captain America this shit and threw the world into chaos.

It is a sad truth that, at least in the US, the majority only ever cares about war when they're personally affected. It's why we have a "volunteer" military, though truly, our military is loaded with poor people who had no real option in their home communities other than joining up, and also why we're never having another draft.

Even so, it's still glad to see the majority becoming more anti-war even if only out of self-interest.

[–] TBi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

But I was told it was Bidens Fault!

/s

And yeah it’s scary how selfish people are. I always think that people are like myself and look out for others, but no they’d fuck you over for a Klondike bar.

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Thank you, Iran.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Gang Solves Climate Change

[–] ghen@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Between covid and the Iran war, Trump is the most environmentally friendly president ever!

[–] JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Only temporarily.

[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 6 points 1 day ago

Task failed successfully

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh we should give Iran a Nobel peace prize for actions that helped cut CO2 emissions. That'll drive trump crazy, I really want to see that I could do with a good laugh.

[–] wraekscadu@vargar.org 1 points 23 hours ago

Thanks comrade Trump! /s

[–] mister_flibble@sh.itjust.works 33 points 2 days ago
[–] insanemantis@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

While the title is technically true, it's incredibly misleading to people who don't read carefully, which unfortunately makes up a huge part of the internet

We're gonna get a bunch of dumbasses thinking that the Iran war is somehow good for the environment

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

Clearly, we need to make it into WW3 for even more environmental friendliness

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 day ago (17 children)

So... Trump did something that had a positive effect? Not that it's a net positive, I mean, he started an illegal war and bombed schools with kids inside. And talking about children, don't forget he raped kids.

[–] LemmySuxNow@reddthat.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

On a global scale, Trump has done a lot of good by directly undermining the power of the US Empire and accelerating its decline.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Accelerationism Works, just so long as you don't count all the people viciously slaughtered in the transitional period

[–] r1veRRR@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Thankfully, most accelerationists are privileged white people living in very blue states and cities, so that's very easy to ignore.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] LeftReddit2@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

With all sources of carbon considered, including deforestation, total global CO2 emissions are set to continue increasing.

Well that's not good.

[–] Ravenheart@lemmy.zip 24 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Sucks how our quality of life has been made inversely proportional to the health of the environment. Most of us have been locked in to fossil fuel dependence whether we like it or not.

covid showed us that at a large scale. we all took a step back animals started reclaming the earth.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

I was almost excited, but then you (rightfully) crushed it, OP.

With all sources of carbon considered, including deforestation, total global CO2 emissions are set to continue increasing.

Sigh. Still on track for my children starving to death in the famines to come.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I said 20 years ago that we should let gas prices rise. My target at the time was $10/gallon. If we believe capitalism works then let it work for us. You add another digit to the cost of regular unleaded and you watch how fast people adopt EVs.

Climate Change wasn't the focus of my angst back then but probably should have been.

[–] LemmySuxNow@reddthat.com 14 points 1 day ago (9 children)

EVs are only marginally better. Public transit is the answer.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 204 points 2 days ago (31 children)

The only real way to fight climate change is to make fossil fuels more expensive than alternatives. The vast majority won’t do it for environmental reasons.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 139 points 2 days ago (33 children)

It's really absurd that we are still subsidizing fossil fuels rather than increasing the tax rates on them.

load more comments (33 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
[–] bss03@infosec.pub 36 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This is why a carbon tax on fuel would help, and why ending fossil fuel subsidies would also help. Even both isn't the end of government action, but they would both be good way to incentivize using alternatives.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›