this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2026
1047 points (99.5% liked)

science

29877 readers
415 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/54245880

The U.S. war with Iran has raised fossil fuel prices so much that the resulting drop in oil demand has put the world on track to see a rare dip in carbon emissions from these sources in 2026.

Between 2019 and 2025, carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels grew by about 0.8 percent annually, according to a new study published in Nature Climate Change. But 2026 is set to buck that trend: high oil prices, as well as the continued rise of green technology—solar power, wind and electric cars—will cause a “short-term” 0.4 percent drop, according to the study.

“The high petrol prices following the war in Iran are reducing oil use and keeping emissions low,” says the study’s lead author Corinne Le Quéré, a professor of climate change science at the University of East Anglia in England. “But that’s not the whole story: The expansion of renewable energy has progressed a lot in recent years, led by China. And [along with electric vehicles], this is offsetting two thirds of the growing demand for energy.”

With all sources of carbon considered, including deforestation, total global CO2 emissions are set to continue increasing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LemmySuxNow@reddthat.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

On a global scale, Trump has done a lot of good by directly undermining the power of the US Empire and accelerating its decline.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Accelerationism Works, just so long as you don't count all the people viciously slaughtered in the transitional period

[–] r1veRRR@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thankfully, most accelerationists are privileged white people living in very blue states and cities, so that's very easy to ignore.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

most accelerationists are privileged white people

Most people you interact with online are privileged.

I think you'd be surprised to see how many people are perfectly fine with burning Western Imperialism down once you get outside your bubble

[–] JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure it's a rule of privilege to think you're not privileged.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

That's what you got out of it? Well, if thinking is a privilege it's most certainly one you don't have.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

That’s what you got out of it?

The baseline argument is pretty fascile. "Um, aktuly, only snobs think destabilization has any benefit".

Literally go to any prison in America. You'll find accelerationists. People generally don't like institutions when those institutions are oppressive.