this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2024
208 points (99.1% liked)

News

39235 readers
1406 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy suggested a ceasefire could be possible if Ukraine’s NATO membership is offered for areas under Kyiv’s control, with occupied regions negotiated diplomatically later.

This marks the first time Zelenskyy has hinted at a deal leaving some Russian-occupied territory temporarily under Moscow’s control.

He emphasized NATO membership as essential to prevent further Russian aggression.

Zelenskyy also expressed readiness to work with Donald Trump, despite reports that Trump’s plans may involve Ukraine ceding occupied land.

Roughly 20% of Ukraine remains under Russian control.

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 49 points 2 years ago (3 children)

If Ukraine wants this, it's their choice, and I absolutely understand why they would want to end the war.
But Russia should not think we can return to business as usual after this.
It's shameful IMO that EU hasn't helped Ukraine more.

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago

But Russia should not think we can return to business as usual after this.

Oh we will, we will for sure, as soon as the bombs stop falling it's time to build more cheap gas pipelines.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 years ago

With Trump incoming there's a pretty finite clock on how long Ukraine has to cease hostilities. Otherwise it's likely to face united opposition.

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 15 points 2 years ago

When they lost Chrimea, it was a total loss and a further war was inevitable. If you give up more territory for NATO membership, you can rest assured you won't go to war again.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The Winter War, which is generally considered a Soviet failure, still ended with Finland ceding a significant amount of territory to the Soviet Union. I wonder how similar Ukrainian leaders think their situation is to Finland's...

Zelenskyy also expressed readiness to work with Donald Trump, despite reports that Trump’s plans may involve Ukraine ceding occupied land.

There's no other reasonable course of action available to Zelensky. With that said, Trump might be volatile enough to actually support Ukraine's NATO bid. I don't think a rational US President would.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

left to his own feces, trump will abandon ukraine in a heartbeat and leave it for putin. the moronic voters in the u.s. chose that path.

that's why ukraine is saying they're willing to 'work with' trump, there's no other choice.

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well, this war is amazing business for the US military-industrial complex, so we'll see if they still have more sway in shaping US foreign policy than Putin: https://www.vox.com/world/2022/12/16/23507640/dc-party-invite-military-contractors-money-ukraine-russia-war-us

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 2 years ago

So far, evidence suggests that the MIC was a paper tiger, at least compared to Russian Intelligence. It's, frankly, embarrassing.

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He's a wildcard but Trump has pretty consistently opposed NATO including wanting the US to withdraw from it. Which makes sense as it would benefit Putin.

[–] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In his credit; he did criticise the other members for not spending enough on defence and that turned out to be a valid criticism and now everyone has increased that spending.

[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

The funny thing is that the American military spending is not a gift to the world, it is the price to have US military bases around the world.

Me, as a non American, I am happy that there is less power concentrated in the hands of US (and not because US but because concentration of powers is always wrong)

But does this make sense for US? 🤷‍♂️

[–] Steve@communick.news 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

That seems totally reasonable to me.
"We'll stop fighting, and let you have what you stole. But if you attack again at all, it'll be a very different kind of fight for you. In the long run, you'll probably have lost more than you gained by pulling this bullshit."

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)

No it's not actually reasonable, Russia doesn't deserve to get anything.
But I can perfectly understand why Ukraine doesn't want this war, they never wanted it. It was 100% Russian aggression, and that shouldn't be rewarded, but sometimes reality isn't fair, and you have to make unpleasant compromises.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You are not wrong, but joining NATO is the only way to ensure Russia won't just declare war again. And we have to be realistic here: Ukraine has surpassed all expectations here already. We can't expect this miracle to go on indefinitely.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

joining NATO is the only way to ensure Russia won’t just declare war again.

Absolutely.

[–] Steve@communick.news 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's not about deserving. Nobody deserves anything.
And you perfectly explained why it is reasonable.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ukraine deserve their territory back, I don't see how anything I wrote says this is reasonable to Ukraine in any way.

[–] Steve@communick.news 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ukraine doesn't want this war, they never wanted it. [...] but sometimes reality isn't fair, and you have to make unpleasant compromises.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

None of those translate to anything being reasonable. I think you mean rational. As reasonable also means fair.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/reasonable

For Ukraine to give in is maybe a necessity, that doesn't make it reasonable, because Russia is extremely unreasonable, which is why a reasonable compromise isn't possible.

[–] Steve@communick.news -1 points 2 years ago

Reason ... Able. Something that is able to be reasoned. It has nothing to do fair.

Honestly. Deserving and Fair, are privileged naive ideas to bring to war.

[–] coolguy@piefed.social 12 points 2 years ago

It will be interesting to see what happens here. Hope for the best, expect the worst.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Some ceasefire, with frozen conflict - similar to Korea. No real solution or peace treaty. That's why the landmines.

[–] WhyFlip@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Not me, Zelensky.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Something akin to my marriage.

[–] halykthered@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

A grueling daily standoff, mired with silent and tense interactions in the hallway, like ships passing in the night? A lonely, cold existence punctuated by depression medication dampened flaccid shower masturbation? A dreary, lifeless union blessed by a loud shop vac in the basement, so the kids can't hear you crying? You can't recall the last time you wore a seatbelt or drove sober, because she's always smiling at her damn phone, and always leaves the room to answer a call. You paid for the fucking thing, and her passcode isn't even the same as it used to be. Nothing is anymore. Maybe today's the day someone won't stop at a red light, or maybe you'll finally try to grab a cop's gun. But you won't. The drudgery shambles on.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Sheer poetry.

I think I'm going for that gun next time.