Steve

joined 2 years ago
[–] Steve@communick.news 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Exactly!
I'm glad someone saw it. I thought it was a little obvious while writing it. Then after peoples responses, I was worried it was too veiled. Thank you.

[–] Steve@communick.news 7 points 16 hours ago

That's how imagination works. You can imagine something having nothing to do with reality.
Maybe I don't understand the question.

[–] Steve@communick.news -1 points 16 hours ago

Isn't that what full self driving vehicles are?
They only barley work in small local areas, needing frequent human interventions when anything unexpected happens. There's no real reason to believe they'll every work in our lifetimes, the way we imagine they will.

[–] Steve@communick.news 8 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (6 children)

Maybe when it's illegal for humans to drive on public roads, and all the self-driving cars have a local mesh network to coordinate and negotiate actions, we can get rid of human road rules.

But yah, until then, no.

[–] Steve@communick.news 74 points 23 hours ago (10 children)

Isn't it the whole point, that they'll be better drivers than humans?
Or will they be so good they don't need to follow the rules?

[–] Steve@communick.news 59 points 1 day ago (5 children)

[he] acknowledged the backlash and labeled his critics ‘snowflakes’

I'm not offended or bothered by it.
It's just super werid, and I don't understand the message he's trying to make. Like is he against capitalist consumer culture? Is he fighting Santa because Christmas is for Jesus? Or is Santa socialized gifting, and he's for capitalism? Or does he just want to look like a superhero beating up someone, and didn't think through who he was beating up?

[–] Steve@communick.news 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're preemptive, CYA kinds of laws.
Like the law against whale hunting in Utah.

[–] Steve@communick.news -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

November 6th 1988
Nothing special about they day really. It's just happened to be the day when the Legrand Poumpaugh themselves decreed as such. Glory be their nostrals.

[–] Steve@communick.news 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Why the limit of 3.5 tons?

[–] Steve@communick.news 9 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I feel the same way, every time some rando stranger calls me friend

[–] Steve@communick.news 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It's hard to ~~he~~ be wrong twice in one sentence
Congrats

 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/51939701

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40474442

I've always wanted to talk about how weird it was scrolling through reddit and then suddenly seeing myself on the front page. I was banned from reddit for talking about politics (I am anti trump) on the air force reddit so I wasn't even able to comment on a post about me.

For some backstory, I was returning from a Halloween cruise and it was the only clean shirt I had left (I was planning on wearing it during the cruise as there were no children allowed on the cruise and with the theme I thought it would get a few laughs or at least start a conversation). I never did though and doing laundry on a cruise was quite expensive (I think 50 dollars per load or something like that). I tried to hide the shirt as best I could throughout the day as I do think it was slightly inappropriate to wear in a public setting.

For the record, I love all the comments roasting me and I laughed all fucking day reading them!

Anyways, I have always wanted to publicly talk about this and in my search for reddit alternatives I found lemmy so here we are. Thank you for coming to my ted talk.

Proof: https://i.imgur.com/rd9DPO8.jpeg

 

To my mind, Ban has always meant permanent.
"You're banned from this place! You'll never be allowed in again!"

While I've always thought of Suspend as being temporary.
"You're being suspended from school for 1 week, over fighting."

Ban:

  1. to prohibit especially by legal means
  2. bar entry

Suspend:

  1. to debar temporarily especially from a privilege, office, or function
  2. a: to cause to stop temporarily
    b: to set aside or make temporarily inoperative
  3. to defer to a later time on specified conditions
  4. to hold in an undetermined or undecided state awaiting further information

When I hear someone mention they were banned my reaction is: "Holy shit! WTF did you do to earn that!" Then I find out it was only for a day or three: "Oh... That's not a Ban! That's minor. Go touch grass. You'll be fine."

I've been banned from subreddits and communities a few times. At least once I never even noticed because it was so short.

How is it a Ban if I didn't even notice?

Why did Ban in online forums and games, come to mean temporary?

Is it simply an example of the intensification of language? To make something mundane, seem more severe than it is?

Does it bother anyone else? Or am I alone here?

 

I'm genuinely curious about peoples thoughts on this.

It made sense for a while. But the branding change was 16 months ago. The URI change was 3 months ago. Everybody knows now what X is. Yet for some reason, I still see in news stories today:
"... on X — formerly known as Twitter — and said ..."
I really don't think that's needed anymore. But I'm always one to want changes as fast and painless as possible.

So what do you think would be an appropriate amount of time to keep reminding everyone that Twitter is now X?
Months?
Years?
How many?

 

Kagi AI summery:
Cards Against Humanity (CAH) is suing SpaceX for allegedly taking over a plot of land on the US/Mexico border that CAH purchased in 2017 to prevent the construction of Trump's border wall. CAH claims it maintained the land but SpaceX later moved construction equipment and materials onto the property without permission. The lawsuit seeks up to $15 million in damages to restore the land and cover losses, and also requests punitive damages. CAH says SpaceX never asked for permission to use the property and never apologized for the damage. The lawsuit includes before and after photos purporting to show SpaceX's use of the land.

And CAH's website all about it

view more: next ›