what if it was a paper map? would the mapping company be liable?
put the blame where it belongs; on the construction company who failed to block an unnavigable, dangerous piece of road.
this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
206 points (95.2% liked)
Technology
6943 readers
566 users here now
News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.
What doesn't fit here?
The core of the story has to be technology focused.
- If article mentions "AI" in a sentence and then talks about business economics that doesn't make it tech news.
- Gaming is too many layers removed from technology. There are many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Transporation is too many layers removed from technology. EVs while use many cool technologies have many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Entertainment is too many layers removed from technology. While sometimes it can fit here, business or cultural aspects of it are a better fit for dedicated communities.
- Cybersecurity. While it heavily focuses on technology, most of the time it's too technical for most people who are not already invested in it. Should be posted in a dedicated communities unless it has broader connection to other tech areas.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefix
Country prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah I mean it would have been good if google maps could have prevented this but like the same thing could have happened to someone without a map
Yeah, I mean, someone has to provide the information. If one day, there’s a full bridge, and the next day it’s deconstructed for repairs, Google can’t magically know; some information needs to be pushed out to be parsed and updated. It wouldn’t surprise me if this was simply done by construction co. without proper filing etc. very few nations have the extreme regulations that U.S. has - it's one of America’s redeeming qualities. Of course, that may not always be the case. But yknow.
I suppose it depends on the locale, but I'm my experience, the cities I've lived in update the gis maps and send change updates to Google very regularly, where they sit unimplemented for months.
Yeah I can see that being a problem too. Shrug.
I used to travel by paper map for like all of the 90s and 00s. I can reliably say, it was never the map's fault.
A more accurate title is "Three men die when road crews fail to barricade a broken bridge".
- As soon as the bridge was deemed unsafe, it should have had barricades erected.
- Situational awareness supersedes maps, digital or not.
- Every GPS device, paper map and App out there would have had even chances to miss this.
- Driving in India is insane, even if the infrastructure wasn't as bad as it is... and to be clear, it's awful.
Situational awareness is key, but if all other indicators suggested everything was fine and you were driving up a bridge at night, there's not much warning before the road is suddenly not there thanks to the curvature of the road. I've seen plenty of short clips of cars dropping into missing road segments due to whatever reasons, and it's just not something you look for normally while driving nor is it that easy to see from a distance vs. an obstacle on the road. It's possible they tried to stop and just couldn't in time. The vehicle would be farther away if they had just flown off and not right below the base.
Do they not put barricades in the road when it's closed in India?
Infrastructure and Driving in India come with substantial risks to life.
I fail to see how that's Google Maps' fault. This is the city's fault for not blocking the bridge. Would people have complained if a paper map didn't update all the collapsed bridges daily?
I'd probably also somewhat blame the person that drove off the bridge that clearly goes nowhere.
Looks like it might have been dark and foggy. The government failed to block the extremely dangerous situation— a standard practice when a bridge is put in other places.
Seems like blame can be applied at least three ways at once.
It's from India, here either news reporters take bribe to not write it was authorities fault or can't think straight and rational.
What excuse do they have for ignoring traffic signs and literally every other indication that the road is closed?
A GPS doesn’t absolve you from personal responsibility. Use your eyes.
They were driving in the night. Visibility was poor. The road wasn't closed off. Just to name a few.
You're probably imagining reflective signs, barricades, lights, led warning signs, etc. I know i would expect all of those.
But this is India. And we're talking about a company that didn't even block the road. There is a very good chance there were no indications visible in the night.
Given that there is death involved, this is "sensitive"... So I will not post a gif of Michael and Dwight driving into the river because the GPS told them to.
I will not chuckle at the thought of this hypothetical meme
Truly the show's biggest jumping of the shark.
google maps once tried to send me through a military base. Like, yes this would technically be faster if it wasn't for the armed guards.
apple maps hasn't tried to kill me ... yet
There were almost monthly stories about Apple Maps leading to death and near-death experiences when they came out, not sure about now. Hopefully they got better.
I use it. It’s definitely gotten better. The traffic and business data isn’t as good as Google’s, but otherwise they’re pretty comparable these days.
Genuine question: If Apple Maps is inferior to Google Maps, why do you use it? I don't want to sound judgemental, but it seems like trading giving your info from one giant corporation to another. If I ever de-Google I'll switch to Open Street Maps...
Apple already has my location data from other apps including Find My. I’d rather give it to one megacorp instead of 2 I guess.
Totally valid. I guess anything is better than nothing, they all pretty much have our data anyway...
load more comments
(1 replies)
This is an old story, hopefully they've done something about it
"Australian police call the application "potentially life threatening" after travelers are left stranded in scorching-hot temperatures"
https://theweek.com/articles/469634/4-nightmarescenarios-involving-apple-maps
I've been sent the wrong way up one way streets (big flaw to not have the fucking direction of traffic marked so that's also on the city design) and my wife was sent through a quarry once
Fucking weird part is that the quarry route is a legit road that connects to a shopping center on the other side, so I guess that one is fine?
That's stone cold.
Guess that means the trip to the shops involves a rally stage?
...and that's why you don't use car navigation in airplane mode.
If it's not in airplane mode, how do you expect the car to fly over the gap in the bridge?
Have you not seen Speed? You drive faster.
Had a lady in my store yesterday insisting that we had an item because google said so
Those people are fun the first and second time. After that you start getting a certain attitude towards them.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Man, I went to like 3 different Targets to find an item because the company that made the item said those Targets carried it. None of them did.
Of course, nothing is better than a store saying they carry an item when they in fact do not. That happens pretty frequently when I'm looking for something specific. Not out of stock mind you, but they will never have stock.
I had to check. I'm pretty sure it's this bridge in OpenStreetMap https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15%2F28.02674%2F79.48926 And there it is also not closed off for routing
Sure glad they circled it, I didn’t know which end was unfinished.
lol but I am pretty sure what’s circled is the downed vehicle.
Bridges and cars are easy to confuse. Hence the red circle
reminds me of the movie "idiocracy" when Joe looks out of the window at the hospital.
"Three men die in bizarre money-laundering incident."
Judging by the pictures, that bridge was never going to connect to anything.
The article tells you it's a repair of a wash out. So it absolutely does have a connection.
Darwin would like to have a word with the driver
Take control of your mapping and learn to use your brain
#openstreetmap
"THE MACHINE KNOWS!"
view more: next ›