this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2026
56 points (98.3% liked)

Buy European

10933 readers
349 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat of this community


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
  • No generative AI content.

Useful Websites

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Friendica:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Sunshine@piefed.ca 24 points 1 month ago

Disappointing.

[โ€“] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)

For everyone not in the know, the Unreal Engine Lighting model is about 260 years out of date. No, that's not a joke. The lighting model is based on Lambert's paper from 1760. That's the reason why literally every surface looks like plastic.

[โ€“] alfredon996@feddit.it 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But plastic didn't exist in 1760!

[โ€“] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It doesn't matter if plastic existed back then. The consequence of the Lambertian lighting model is that every surface, because of the flawed reflectance physics, now looks like plastic. Alternatively, you could say it looks like clay. It doesn't matter what analogy you use, the surfaces should not look this way.

[โ€“] nezrock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

Lambert, Lambert, what a prick.

[โ€“] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is so funny (and wrong). Just code your shaders yourself to use the model you want.

[โ€“] Moodel@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Explain why it is wrong you doofus.

Don't just drive by saying 'This is so funny...'. :/

[โ€“] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago

Engines dont force a lighting model (since like y 2000 or very simple ones) because you make your own with the pixel shaders, and with the setup you want (deferred lighting is more complicated for example, toon shading not so much, phong is super simple, flat is simpler and so on. All available with the UE). So the whole "lighting model from 200 years ago" is just a joke, it's like "they force you to use mommy brown, a color not made any more!" It doesn't make sense, or if it do so, please do enlighten me ๐Ÿ˜Œ

[โ€“] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Generally the onus is on the one making the claim to prove it is correct.

[โ€“] RaphaelSchmitz@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They did that?

Which is why the "nuh uh wrong" is now a new statement that needs to have some foundation to be worth anything. Cmon this ain't rocket science

[โ€“] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Where exactly in this comment did they prove their claim?

"For everyone not in the know, the Unreal Engine Lighting model is about 260 years out of date. No, that's not a joke. The lighting model is based on Lambert's paper from 1760. That's the reason why literally every surface looks like plastic."

Also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitchens's_razor

[โ€“] RaphaelSchmitz@feddit.org 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

They put the name there so you can easily Google it. If you had any intention you could find Lambert shading on Wikipedia real quick, that's usually enough for a conversation between people that's not a scientific paper.

I have no scientific footnotes for these statements I just made, don't even ask.

[โ€“] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

You're insufferable, however a quick search brings up threads such as this one: https://forums.unrealengine.com/t/how-do-i-make-basic-lambert-style-shading/2669505

Where the user is specifically asking to get Lambert shading, which to me, indicates that is in fact not the default.

But go off

Edit: JK you right did more research, obviously using an older diffusion model based on an old paper isn't great, but it's not like that's literally all the engine does/can do.

It's just a hyperbolic claim while partially correct.

[โ€“] RaphaelSchmitz@feddit.org 1 points 4 weeks ago

Woah, calm it with the aggression, it's not a life threatening issue

[โ€“] akunohana@piefed.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If it gives them more room to focus on story and other decisive qualities, why not.

[โ€“] Sunshine@piefed.ca 40 points 1 month ago

The Witcher 3 was able to do all those things, why make ourselves dependent on an American game engine?

Letโ€™s keep using the Polish one instead for Ciriโ€™s story.

[โ€“] Hiro8811@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

From what I heard it's because they reached the maximum of the Red Engine with Cyberpunk.

[โ€“] maam@feddit.uk 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can upgrade game engines...

[โ€“] Newsteinleo@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are limits to what can be easily done, at some point it makes more sense to start over. Given the choice of build a new game engine or use an existing one, I would choose to use an existing one.

[โ€“] maam@feddit.uk 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I would choose to use an existing one.

If youโ€™re thinking small and donโ€™t care about innovation sure.

Iโ€™m still pissed about how Halo Infiniteโ€™s game engine was sabotaged because Microsoft cared more about avoiding employee benefits so they hired 18 month contractors who kept getting fired right when they mastered the new engine.

[โ€“] Newsteinleo@infosec.pub -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Most games aren't that innovative. But you are correct for projects like Kitten Space Agency a custom engine makes sense. However building from scratch takes longer and added to development cost.

[โ€“] maam@feddit.uk 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Witcher developers arenโ€™t starting from scratch though, they can optimise the engine and add better physics.

[โ€“] Newsteinleo@infosec.pub 0 points 1 month ago

That optimisation may come at a greater cost than using an existing engine. You also have to consider, with an industry standard engine it is easier to hire and train new devs.

[โ€“] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why? Then it's just going to look like every other game that came out in the past few years ffs!

[โ€“] Sunshine@piefed.ca 4 points 1 month ago

And the physics would be boring.

[โ€“] DegradationDenial@feddit.nl 3 points 1 month ago

Xbox360 graphics was good enough.

[โ€“] kepix@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The Witcher 4 isn't going to look and feel like a "generic" UE5 game, Nowakowski suggests.

is this an ai article?

[โ€“] cyberfae@piefed.social -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I just hope they can create a playable experience for hanhelds. It's not like the ram shortage is going to stop anytime soon. EDIT to add: it would be ideal if they switched to a different engine for their next installment, but doing that mid game would just cause a repeat of cyberpunk 2077.