this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2026
109 points (95.0% liked)

Canada

12208 readers
270 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 72 points 1 week ago (3 children)
  1. Doubt
  2. I'll never, ever, ever, forgot how the US is behaving right now. They're never more than 4 years from being this shitty, we cannot ever rely on or trust any deal they might try and make.
  3. How about those Epstein files?
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)
  1. Doubt

Correct. My immediate thought here is "Under what law?"

They've already gone through this. Trump's initial gambit, the IEEPA, got comprehensively struck down. That leaves him with two options; a law that was intended to address balance of payments issues (very likely to get stuck down in its own ongoing legal trials because, tldr, balance of payments issues haven't existed since they moved to fiat currency), which can only be used to impose tariffs of up to 15%, or a law that can be used to apply sector specific tariffs but only after an extensive investigation. That means they actually have to be able to justify, in court (because they will get sued by all the US buyers affected by these tariffs) the actual economic impact that is being mitigated.

The former is a non-starter - capped at 15%, has to be applied globally, not to one specific country, and based on super shakey legal grounds, and the latter will collapse the moment they're asked to show their work.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess they think they found a new law.

I’m just tired of this shit. No deal with the US means anything. No, there aren’t good American politicians who will stand up for what’s right, and you’re never four years away from either a better deal or your deals getting ripped up.

The USA cannot be trusted as a partner ever again. I’ll never ever forget.

load more comments (1 replies)

Carney: "We're not going to do anything about it for the benefit of the economy."

Ron Howard: "The economy being his closest billionaire friends."

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago

On number 2, I won’t either. The whole lot of them too, even the ‘good ones’ are running excuses now. It’s getting that bad they’re starting to blame our countries for not sanctioning them. Don’t they get fucking wild when you tell them to stay home and fix their problem.

For years they took shots at us about our reasonable gun laws, socialist oppression, lack of Fr3ed0m…now they’re bending over taking it, we have to be understanding.

[–] mereo@piefed.ca 61 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This is Trump's way to divert the world from the Iran quagmire he got himself into.

[–] Xyphius@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 week ago

and the pdf files

[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 week ago

The Epstein files.

[–] binux@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Eh, I'd say Hanlon's razor applies quite nicely here (as with pretty much everything Trump causes). The guy is a complete moron that acts entirely without self-control or rationality after all.

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago

Normally I would agree with that position, but in the unique case of Trump, I'm fairly certain it's actually legitimate malice. Stupid malice, but malice.

[–] ryan213@lemmy.ca 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He's mad Spain photoshopped him out of the team photo yesterday and we're the closest to his reach.

[–] Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wait what? Did that really happen 🤣

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not quite. He wandered into the photoshoot trying to horn in on it, like a total fucknugget, but they escorted him off the stage and the photoshoot continued.

[–] Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah got it, wandered on to the stage and assumed everyone was cheering for him

[–] ryan213@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Someone let senile grampa out of the house. 😂

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Senile raging narcissist grampa.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago

And Spain removed him from the photo they posted to social media.

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Trump to hit ~~Canada~~ Americans with new 50% tarrif on Canadian goods.

FTFY. Mexico didn't pay for the wall, Americans did. Canada doesn't pay the tarrifs, Americans do.

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The news media has been failing the American public for a long time now.

[–] mPony@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

along with the education system, the healthcare system, political representation, and the military-industrial complex. It's like all of those things have been turned against the citizens of the United States.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bring back the digital services tax.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m ready to start banning US corporate donors now.

Oh, you donated to Trump, sorry Apple, 100% tariff. Sorry Meta, you’re banned.

Fuck it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

"The Court's 6-3 decision determined that the 1977 IEEPA law does not grant the executive branch the authority to levy tariffs, emphasizing that the power to tax and impose duties rests exclusively with Congress under Article I of the Constitution."

That was in February, I swear that any Republican whom thinks he isn't anti republic is hiding their head in the dirt.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/19/1338

Essentially Trump is pulling the exact same farce, just with a different law this time.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ok

Toddler having another tantrum.

Anyways…

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think it's time to start allowing Canadian corn whisky to be called "bourbon".

[–] FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This would be so funny, the fit that would cause would be awesome to behold.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If NAFTA ends, so does the special naming. It's in there.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] joecitizen@piefed.ca 20 points 1 week ago

The best response to unpredictable neighbours: Canada needs to diversify, maintain strong internal unity, and to focus on relentless self-reliance. Canada has goods the world wants. If the US doesn't want them Canada can and should go elsewhere.

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 week ago

Trump. Rapes. Children.

Smoke and mirrors. Don’t look up.

[–] BillyTheKid2@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago

Good. Double it. Triple it. Cut off all trade.

DO IT

[–] frankdew@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Why stop there? Why not 2000%?

[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

The same percentage he decreased drug prices, amirite!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

exempting "energy, potash, critical minerals and fish" is interesting. I wonder if a possible strategy would be to put limits on those just above the current export amount, just to demonstrate that we could.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

Sounds like we know how to make them squeal then.

[–] SirMaple__@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago
[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

When does Canada impose tariffs on America for their vile, insidious, invasive wildfire smoke from Oregon, Ohio and California needlessly gassing poor innocent Canadians?

Sheesh, we can write crap sensationalistic stuff too ya know.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tariffs only hurt your own population, no need for Canada to spite ourselves.

We should buy everything we can from domestic providers and not jack up costs for people who still need things from the US.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GrackleBirb@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago
[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 12 points 1 week ago

Breaking news: Screaming toddler repeats the same threats he's made numerous times before.

[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It would be so funny if all countries stopped trade with the USA. Let him whine about that.

[–] chuck@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It wouldn't have to be on everything either just pick something like orange juice whiskey or a particular weapons system as a bunch of middle powers to boycott or refuse entry.

I was thinking not sending goods to the USA but not buying their stuff would piss of trumpet just as effectively.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Keep going guy. We could use the reminder. Moving trade away from the US needs a lot of pressure to happen to any significant degree.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

raise the price of Canadian oil

separatists should stop sucking up to the us

[–] chuck@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yep time to get those Epstein files out.

Time to sell us bonds to tank the us borrowing rates

Also time for Canada to recind/ limit any us patents on drugs or copyrights on media to 5 years since initial release.

Maybe repeal anything related to dcma

And why not let's let Doug ford unplug new York for a few hours every day for shits and giggles

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] weps@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

department of trade war hits again

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

The 50 per cent rate is being imposed in response to what a senior administration official described as Canada's retaliation against U.S. trade policy and its discrimination against U.S. motor vehicles, dairy and alcohol.

The new rate would apply to a variety of Canadian imports, "ranging from wine to hockey sticks to cement," the official said, adding that the White House will publish a full list of the affected products.

Person who doesn't know how tariffs work blindly threatens tariffs again.

load more comments
view more: next ›