this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
793 points (99.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

32192 readers
1467 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

rm -rf /*

Oops sorry rm -rf ./*

Just a typo mb

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 hours ago

Please take a the day off πŸ™, please πŸ™!

[–] nitroemdash@lemmy.wtf 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Who the hell uses WhatsApp for comms in IT?

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not all companies have fancy teams and other related apps to communicate.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 hours ago

teams is not fancy, I would say its worse

[–] unquietwiki@programming.dev 4 points 21 hours ago

I used to do contract work for AVASO; they were using WhatsApp for comms at the time.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Banks with obscure security rules

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Yeah, probably so obscure that no one could decipher them…

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

Oh yeah baby, destroy my backend!

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 66 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I'm going to destroy the servers and db then murder the janitor with a hammer.

Oops *deploy

[–] Dumhuvud@programming.dev 7 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

What's the point of deploying a janitor with a hammer when the servers are already destroyed? Smh my head.

[–] Janx@piefed.social 28 points 1 day ago

Please take a vacation!
He has a family. πŸ™πŸ½

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 188 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Assuming green is the boss: I totally agree. If you don't proofread your texts before hitting send, that might be indicative of how you deploy things, too.

I'd love to know how the story continues - did they lose their job? - but considering the JPEG patina on this I don't think we'll ever find out.

[–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 87 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] hosaka@programming.dev 24 points 1 day ago

That also cracked me up. Great phrase

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I barely proof read anything I type on my phone, and my comment history is a testament to that. I deploy code or system changes most days, but I proof read the shit out of those on top of the QC they goes through. Any company worth anything will have a process for reviewing and approving anything being deployed, or probably destroyed for that matter.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 day ago

You vastly overestimate the number of companies that are 'worth anything'.

[–] almost1337@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Up until recently I worked for a company worth anything, and you would be surprised at how many major outages were caused by either skipping the process or gaps in the process.

You know that adage: "the safety rules are written in blood"? The same is true for change processes, just with a cost measured in dollars instead of human injury/worse.

[–] yggstyle@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

So we called this meeting to discuss a change in procedures. HR would like us to remind you that this is entirely unrelated to last week. Also has anyone seen Joe? We'd like him to be here for this. No reason why.

[–] Sergio@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago

Or sometimes there are just multiple failures. That's what I learned from reading Admiral Cloudberg about air disasters: even if you have n safety measures, there's still the chance that there'll be n+1 failures.

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Code should ideally be going through tests before prod anyway. There should be no code changed from successful test to prod. Proofreading shouldn’t matter at that point. Just scheduling the actual deploy.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mostly mean proof what I've written prior to having someone else test. I often will comment out lines when trying different things so I just make sure I clean up what I've done. We have a few human checks as well as some automated checks between each stage of deployment for each environment.

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah that’s what the MRs are supposed to be for. To catch those and proofread.

There shouldn’t be any changes at all from the last test to going to production though. Even cleaning up comments.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Correct. I'm just saying that I proof read my work, that I deploy things, and that I don't proof read my texts.

No I got that. I’m saying that by the time the prod deploy comes around, there’s no proofreading left to do anyway.

Not proofreading texts should have zero bearing on being able to write and deploy software because it should be proofread several times before the actual prod deployment. Hell it very likely isn’t even the same person doing the deployment that wrote the code.

[–] untorquer@quokk.au 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Normally i would disagree completely as texts have crappy input on a small screen and are meant to be fast. I have typos in mine constantly because swide input and it's obvious what the word should have been.

But yeah, an important text like this does merit at least one read through.

[–] filcuk@feddit.uk 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

My texts are rubbish because, somehow, the keyboard predictions & autocorrect are worse now than 5 years ago. We have LLMs barfing out fully coherent sentences on their own, how does this even happen.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

I swear to god this drives me nuts. It was fine years ago. Now it’s ass. What the fuck?

I think it has to do with the architecture. Just a wild guess, but I assume that the design is susceptible to indeterminate results based on device performance. Because it’s really fucking bad when my phone gets a little hot.

My guess is that modern phones are doing 50x more shit than they need to. So passive QoL features like autocorrect are being choked.

[–] untorquer@quokk.au 7 points 1 day ago

Yeah, we could have functional input but no we have to destroy our planet to summarize a one sentence email into a multi-paragraph bulleted list - it's bullshit

on android Heliboard + the swype library is ok. It's at least consistent.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 13 points 1 day ago

The older the jpeg the more likely it is that he's moved on to another job by now.

[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago

If you have to proofread when deploying you're doing things wrong

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 11 points 1 day ago

could just be ADHD. the impulse to speak your mind rarely translates to the impulse to speak to da computah

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I doubt it's real. Most of the screenshots here are just Ai generated for people to react to. It's entertainment.

[–] EmilieEasie@fedinsfw.app 128 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the politeness of this interaction is what makes me laugh

"I know but I insist πŸ™"

[–] db2@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 101 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What a power move. Now he gets a paid day off.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I had a coworker who tried something like this on a federal holiday, ended up bringing down production on everyone's day off, and ruining a bunch of people's days to clean up the mess just because someone was trying to go above and beyond.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

Some managers would praise him for his "spirit", congratulate the rest of the team for their "sacrifice", and still not give anyone a bonus nor a raise, because "that's just the job!".

[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

He'll be the next US president, but for that he'll have to actually destroy everything he touches, not just make threats to do it.

[–] SwissArmyKazoo@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

It'll never not be hilarious how anyone could be so polite in a scenario like this.

Kinda feel bad for them tbh.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Claude run destroy production script.

[–] RogueBanana@piefed.zip 28 points 1 day ago

Aka Claude, do a basic task

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Brb baws imma just do a quick lil dd command in prd

πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

du* - applogies hehe

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

This is typical tech timeline too. Everything is so rushed that shit literally happen in minutes.

[–] garbage_world@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't get it. Why the other person, presumably their boss, asked them to take a day off?

[–] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some people try to work the weekend or weird hours, even when no one asked them to.

And a deploy by someone you don't trust to deploy on the weekend would be a concerning situation

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 3 points 1 day ago

Especially someone who typos.

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Because if you are about to destroy the db and you dont pick up the calls, you give him the day, so he wont do it. Thats what I get.