this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2026
895 points (96.0% liked)

196

6510 readers
1384 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EggInDisguise@lemmy.blahaj.zone 159 points 1 week ago (4 children)

"because that's just how things are done"

Then things are done in a stupid way for stupid reasons that nobody likes and we shouldn't do it then.

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 158 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A little girl sees her mum cooking sausages and asks "mum, why do you cut the ends off of the sausages before you fry them?" Her mum replies "well, that's how I learned it from my mother."

So the girl calls her grandma and asks "grandma, why do you and mum always cut the ends off of sausages before you fry them?" The grandma replies "well, that's how I learned it from my mother."

So the girl calls her great grandmother and asks "great grandma, why do you, mum and grandma always cut the ends off of sausages before you fry them?" The great grandma replies "have they not bought a bigger pan yet?"

[–] EggInDisguise@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I've always heard and told it as "baking bread in an oven that got bigger over the years" but it's my favorite go-to for appeal to tradition.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sergio@piefed.social 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“because that’s just how things are done”

Yeah, that's the essence of conservatism.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My family members always get up in arms when I tell them I changed the family recipe for one dish or another. "You can't change perfection!" Then they try it and ask for the recipe. I hate reverence for the mystical ancestors; they can be - and often are - wrong.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org 26 points 1 week ago

Mom, please get off the internet. It's not good for you.

For clarification, Just joking. That sentence was one of the most repeated anwsers to everything when i dared to ask how something works from my mother.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 102 points 1 week ago (3 children)

/c/autism is leaking.

This is me to my core. (I mean, just check the username.) The easiest way to lose my trust is to say the reason is "because I said so." Okay, but why do you say so? Is there a real reason, or are you being a buzz-kill? Because plenty of people have arbitrary reasons for things and sometimes that's what it comes down to.

I can recall specific instances where I was given a reason and it made all the difference. Like a lot of little kids, I used to scream when having fun. Just saying, "Don't do that" didn't make an impact. But when my mom explained that when she hears me scream, she thinks I'm in trouble, and if I scream for no reason it'd make it harder for her to respond if I were actually in trouble, that's the day I stopped.

A little bit of explanation can go a long way. Sometimes people treat kids like they can't understand deeper reasoning, but that's not true for everyone.

I pay it forward now. A kid I worked with preferred to point at things using his middle finger instead of his pointer finger, even when the thing he was pointing at was on the ceiling. When I told him to use his pointer instead and he asked why, I told him, "Some people think that means something very mean. I don't want people to think you're trying to be mean." That's all it took for him to start using his index finger instead.

Point is, when people explain why something is done a certain way, they can be far more likely to respect their rule. I get that there are times when quick obedience is required, like when there's imminent danger. However, explaining more trivial situations builds the trust necessary to navigate those moments better. If someone's always pushing for authority over arbitrary things, they shouldn't be surprised when people (especially kids) don't listen to them when the matter is serious. Which is why I take the time to explain things with the kids I work with - sometimes we really do need to move quickly, particularly when another kid is acting out aggressively and we need to leave the room. They know I'll give reasons when there is time, so when I tell them to do something with urgency, they know things are getting real and it's time to move.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 30 points 1 week ago

I think one of the reasons some of the little kids in my life like me is I try to give them honest explanations. They don't always fully understand, but I think they appreciate getting answers. And probably appreciate the occasional "I don't know, actually. Let's look it up"

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 1 week ago

it's frankly baffling to me that people don't just throw in a one-sentence explanation of why kids should do things, how tf are they supposed to learn?

Something i've come to realize is that an absolutely horrifying amount of my """autistic""" traits were just from not having had the opportunity to learn things, like when i was a kid i literally didn't understand that i was supposed to speak up if i'm in pain, i just sort of assumed that adults knew and didn't care.
Just in the past 5-10 years my life has been hugely improved by seeking out knowledge on my own, to the point that i now find informal social stuff so easy that other people are impressed.

It's why i'm an ardent supporter of the idea that most (or at least many) disabilities are almost entirely a problem with society, not the individual. And the depressing thing is that a lot of the adjustments to be made are really not that significant at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rain_enjoyer@sopuli.xyz 59 points 1 week ago (2 children)

some of these mysterious rules are peer pressure from dead people; fuck that. some of these are safety rules meant for conditions that no longer exist

[–] AlataOrange@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 week ago (9 children)

What is an example of a safety rule who's conditions no longer exist which would not have the conditions almost immediately return if the rule was removed?

Like every example I can think of is a regulation to stop companies from hurting people which they would simply resume doing given the choice, thus making us still need the rule?

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 24 points 1 week ago

What is an example of a safety rule who’s conditions no longer exist which would not have the conditions almost immediately return if the rule was removed?

My job is populated by dinosaurs that only recently adopted git for version control. They had some rules and procedures that made a kind of sense when deployment meant "I'll scp the files to the prod server", but don't add value anymore.

Some people had a rule where after "deploy" they would SSH into prod and check the md5 hash of the files and compare them to their local copy. You don't have to do that.

They also wanted to only allow one person to work on a file at the same time because "you can overwrite their changes". Git handles that fine (unless you really fuck up the merge conflict, admittedly)

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jtrek@startrek.website 56 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sometimes the real reason is uncomfortable and they don't want to say it out loud. Like, "the CEO is an idiot, and wants it this way for stupid reasons"

Though maybe "the CEO doesn't understand how Google calendar works, so he thinks putting our time off in a shared spreadsheet is easier" would satisfy?

At my job a lot of stupid things come out of "someone high ranking doesn't understand computers" or "they don't benefit from fixing this, so it's easier for them to leave it stupid"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 45 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (14 children)

ITT rampant discrimination/ableism. People acting like the world is functional or that most rules make sense and are grounded in reality.

If somebody asks why a rule is the way it is, something really beautiful happens if people entertain and allow that questioning.

Was the rule made that way to simply punish someone in the past? Could the rule be improved? Does the rule apply to the present day? Could the rule be done away with?

If the enforcement of rules is taken seriously, the questioning, validity, and improvement of those rules should be, as well.

Otherwise, we live in an authoritarian society that actively encourages enforcing/following draconian rules no one understands - rules that would likely be enforced improperly or in an unbalanced sense, because nobody can properly explain it when somebody questions the rule (in good faith).

Having trouble with authority and/or being neurodivergent doesn't mean you are anti-social, dangerous, or bad for the workplace.

Bad rules, however, can be anti-social or create a culture of anti-social behavior, they can be dangerous or harmful (especially if they can not be explained and are not widely understood), and they can be bad for the workplace. It may just not be readily apparent when everybody keeps their heads down and says yes all the time to bullshit.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's like people think I'm just trying to be an asshole. I really don't like starting conflict without having a good reason, and questioning the questionable is one of the best reasons out there.

I swear, some of my recent posts have brought out some nasty responses that I didn't expect. On one hand, I don't want to hold myself back from posting stuff just because I fear unjustified backlash. At the same time, I need to better prepare myself for it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean I usually do have a problem with authority, mostly because they can't adequately explain why.

[–] Mora@pawb.social 28 points 1 week ago

And because they hurt people. And will not apologise or even acknowledge it and prevent it from happening again. See different religions, police forces, politicians, CEOs, ... fuck authorities, if they don't have a proper process to deal with their own errors.

[–] OldSageRick@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 week ago

What I learned to do is mentally answer my own question with

"Because at the end of the month we will get a 4 number number added to the bank account, which we need for wifey to get dino nuggies"

[–] ivan@piefed.social 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

My biggest motivation to work is pure spite. Especially as an engineer. If I'm told my idea for something is shit without sufficient explanation - I'll be secretly working on that to either discover myself why it's shit or come back at ya with "SEE?!".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I mean, often what people mean is "I don't have the time and/or energy right now to explain it to you".

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm willing to postpone explanations if they insist, but I still eventually want an answer

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Phantaloons@piefed.zip 36 points 1 week ago (8 children)

"Because we'll stop paying you if you don't do it."

...well, that's fairly convincing.

Yeah, convincing me to find another job.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 34 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The ultimate hidden truth of the world is that it is something that we make, and could just as easily make differently.

– David Graeber

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] noobface@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Ah pathological demand avoidance. It's not my inability to cope with ambiguity that's the problem, it's everyone else's inability to meet my arbitrary standards.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I agree but I can also accept that I’m not necessarily capable of understanding a reason why. Something not making sense to me personally doesn’t inherently mean it doesn’t make sense objectively. Maybe I’m lacking context or perspective or I’m ignorant to some important factor. I’m not the arbiter of what makes sense or not and my ego isn’t so big that I think I get to be the one who decides what makes sense and what doesn’t. If a person can explain to me why it’s important to them and it can withstand some poking or prodding that’s good enough for me. Sometimes it’s an understanding problem not an explaining problem. I accept the rules of physics are real but I don’t actually understand them in any depth, it’s the same thing. Humility is important too.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] greencoil@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 27 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I feel like this meme being originally from an autism community, posted outside of it without that context, has lead to some egregiously bad takes in the comments. Unfortunately ironic. People coming in here having no idea what the autistic experience of people giving vague instructions and then just assuming you will figure stuff out is like. And then the reverse; trying your best to explain a process in hopes that there will be no ambiguity, only to be accused of being condescending.

And of course we have a plethora of "well in this edge case, its actually necessary to not question instructions!" takes, as if we are talking about last minute bomb defusals, instead of everyday office procedure or insensitive social situations. People on the spectrum are a great showcase of how unwilling the average person is to question the status quo.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

i'm not sure why "social cues" and "authority" would have much to do with each other, it's not like anarchists are socially inept, in fact being socially adept is kinda a core part of functional anarchy.

I dislike arbitrary things as well, but thanks to the magic of understanding how to be social i can just talk to people about it and explain why i think arbitraryness sucks ass, and they then treat me nicely and feel bad about my struggles since i'm so easy to deal with.
And it's not like i'm some 10 charisma bard, simply being chill and not actively unpleasant gets you 80% of the way. Even if you never make eye contact you'll still be seen as pretty normal if you speak normally and follow basic conversational etiquette.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"It's there for a reason" drives me bonkers. Sometimes the reason is bad!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheEntity@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The secret ingredient is violence. Often legal state-mandated violence, otherwise just plain abuse and violence that's willingly ignored by the authorities.

"Do it or the state will hurt you" is a valid reason that I will understand. I will still sneakily do the thing instead if I think it's worth the risk, but I do consider the reason.

load more comments
view more: next ›