I can see my house from here!
this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
479 points (99.6% liked)
pics
28850 readers
713 users here now
Rules:
1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer
2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.
3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.
4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.
5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.
Photo of the Week Rule(s):
1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.
2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.
Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Wow... 😮
i remember i lived in an apartment complex with a pool. we only had three warm months out of the year and i never used the pool anyway
Better than Florida, we get 3 months out of the year where the pools not bath water warm.
Canada?
Same. I was there like 5 years. Used the pool twice.
Not gonna lie, I don’t think that’s enough recreation space for the number of units there.
And I don’t see any commercial space at all. That’s got to be enough units for several thousand people. Like, think about how much store space would be needed to make sure they could get all their groceries.
I don’t think that’s enough recreation space for the number of units there.
Yeah, I got that impression as well. Looks heavily overbuilt, with the amenities being more there to attract new residents than to serve the community.
And I don’t see any commercial space at all.
Probably because this is a top down view at the center of a ring of impossibly tall housing units, not a skyline view of Hong Kong, a city that's got commercial spaces from seaside to Shenzhen.
Where you see the tennis courts probably isn’t street level, and the area below is commercial, restaurants and parking.
I mean, that’s kind a huge issue in Hong Kong, like, how concentrated the commercial areas get. Creates a lot of unnecessarily long travel from housing to commercial, culminating in a lot of pedestrian congestion along stairways, elevators and escalators.
Pedestrian congestion is a big problem in lots of major urban centers. Go down to Shibuya Crossing in Tokyo or Times Square in NYC and you'll find the same problem of big crowds of people clogging areas that weren't designed to accommodate the sheer volume of traffic.
Idk if I'd call it "unnecessarily long travel" so much as "a necessary consequence of this many people living in a limited space". If you don't want that level of crowding, you've got to move outside this hyper-dense city.
I mean, NYC has a fairly healthy level of pedestrian traffic in most areas. Times Square is mostly just full of tourists. I’m not as familiar with Tokyo but my understanding is a a lot of the more dense areas have a sort of 2/3 level layout of commercial, but there is level interconnects or they’re set up in conjunction with transit. So like, there are fairly large underground commercial strips at subway level, or sky bridges between blocks for 2nd story commercial.
They all get backed up during rush hour. It took me ten minutes to get into Shinjuku station one sunny afternoon, because that corner of town was so crammed with people.
Similarly, if you've ever been in the subway tunnels of NYC or DC, you'll know when a game lets out at Madison Square or a parade is happening though the Washington Mall, because these otherwise spacious underground enclaves are stuffed with people.
At some point, you have an issue of induced demand. These urban centers are designed to encourage the free flow of pedestrian traffic and... that's exactly what they create.
Tennis games are 50 vs 50
Not everyone plays tennis and the commercial spaces would be on the first level facing the road, not the inner courtyard. Good complaints in general but not really applicable here.
I also think those recreational spaces may be raised from street level. The perspective is not not meant to show any of that. Could be grocery stores etc. below it as well.
I don’t think that the first level would be enough TBH. Like; it would probably have to be 2 or 3 stories of commercial to serve just the bare minimum needs of that volume of people, and now half your commercial is off street level, complicating pathing from public transit.
Also, it’s tennis, what I assume is racket ball, a swimming pool and a couple basket ball court, so I think it’s actually a pretty good variety of activities, but still, not enough space for the volume of people, if all the blocks around it were the same density and had different varieties of activity, there still just wouldn’t be enough recreational space for the volume of people, even if the variety was absurd between them all.
Like, maybe the density is warranted somewhere like hongkong where the government is largely funded by land sales, so maximizing the density is important for making the land sale valuable enough to fund social services, but like, there’s just not enough visible recreation and comercial, maybe they’ve got a strip underground by a subway station or something. I’d be curious how they make this work.
10–12 stories, a little mall
the lower stories would be more valuable. i would think there’s at least one grocery store on the ground level.
pathing from public transit
i think people are used to taking the escalator in malls
Yah but you’re gonna need a lot of escalators and they’re gonna be very congested. Like, I’m sure it can be made to work, I just question the wisdom of having the commercial be separated out like that.
most chinese malls mainland or not are used to and designed for handling that many people; in fact probably the rest of east asia too. they do have a lot of escalators. hong kong’s got 7M and the mainland 1.4B after all
You're assuming there are commercial spaces, not you don't know anymore than he doesn't know. So it's not really applicable here.
I bet people there interact with other humans more often than suburbanites who only ever leave their property in a car.
I was thinking the same exact thing. I'd be running on those basketball courts all the time.
Holy shit that looks and feels depressing. Let's give as little as possible to the peasants?
Sure, there are some activity spaces there for a small fraction of the people to enjoy, but that is nowhere near enough, and even then of course there is a road going through it
Holy shit that looks and feels depressing.
It's an interior shot from a forced perspective. If you're in a unit looking out on the city or at street level mixing with a crowd, I suspect the vibe is very different.
One bathroom
Like a modern Kowloon.
I know Kowloon was awful in pretty much every way, but there's just something so fascinating about it. I wish there was like an interactive "street view" type thing that let you walk through the entire complex.
Very few people even knew the navigation of it and there were guides for a reason. I dont think you would ever be able to get what you are looking for without just rebuilding Kowloon.
This is mesmerizing. But I just can’t help but wonder how full those tennis courts will be. Or maybe not all the apartments have access to the courts.
Look at all that space dedicated to a vanishingly small number of cars. This could be a nice inner courtyard with some grass or at least way more trees, but nah, we gotta have a road and weird alley with two parking spots per building.
Touching grass impossible.
how so? it seems like every apt comes with a balcony that most have gardens on.
Beats living on the streets.
...yeah, urban hellscapes are pretty bleak but it's obvious someone tried here to make the best they could of what they had to work with...dense as it is in hong kong, the other nice thing is that you don't have to travel too far to experience open parklands...
load more comments
(1 replies)
This is cool and all but it also triggered my fear of falling specifically so fuck you. Still a neat picture.
Just try and land in the pool
The empty pool?
Yesterday I tried to watch a How Ridiculous video (I have mixed feelings about them but they've metaphorically grown on me). In this particular one they're experimenting with the Magnus effect by throwing things off of a cliff.
They've done similar things before, mostly off of what they say is the highest dam in the world. However ... That has at least a guardrail. This was just a cliff and they had to stand right at the edge of it with no PPE.
I tried to endure but when they opened an umbrella over the drop I had to turn it off. It was surprising to me; they're usually at least half decent about safety. At the beginning of this video, one of them even commented on his "jelly legs."
I was having the same fear. Good news! I watched to the end, and spotted the safety ropes they all had on them. They were safe the whole time. Even Scott.
I wish they'd pointed it out clearly, because they are an example to lots of kids. However, it seems they were not in fact totally stupid.
I am watching it again now with my wife here to comfort me. I am glad to observe that you are correct.
I also wish they'd made it more obvious, both for people like us and for kids.
view more: next ›