this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
371 points (98.9% liked)

Anarchism

3125 readers
755 users here now

Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.


Other anarchist comms


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 hours ago

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but trillionaires should be forced to transition into billionaires, and billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 hours ago

They will stop once we have eaten a few of them.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 27 points 22 hours ago

The five wealthiest people who show up on the lists.

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 126 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It’s hilarious how Musk is the wealthiest with multiple businesses that are actively failing and cannot make a solid case for their valuation without going into fantasy scenarios.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Which also means that his wealth valuation is a house of cards, he cant collect on the fake value without crashing it

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But he can take out massive loans on that valuation.

And that money can be used however he wants.

Also, the recent IPO was him collecting money from a lot of people, and since he got exempted into a few indexes, people's retirement money is now tied to Musky scams.

This means that if Musky does decide to cash out and crash the economy, he'll have an instant bailout.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 22 points 1 day ago

people's retirement money is now tied to Musky scams.

Now where have I seen this before...? Gosh, if only history had some warnings...

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Be careful though, suggesting that Starship might never fly, or Full Self Driving might never drive, or that data centers in orbit are unlikely to scale is dangerous on the Internet.

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

Starship flying means nothing when nobody is using Grok which wastes more money than Starship capsule make.

Full self driving is only 1 decade late. Tesla is already behind technologically and their quality is still pathetic.

Data centers in orbit will be orders of magnitude more expensive and complex than data centers on earth. Data centers on earth are having tons of trouble being built because the costs and materials needed are extreme.

Also, Elon Musk is a Nazi that really wanted to be invited to the Epstein pedophile parties.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If we all just collectively decided to eat the top one every week, the problem would just sort itself out after a month or so.

[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago

It would take more than 4-5 occurrences. Inheritance is a thing.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 79 points 1 day ago (3 children)

So now Musk is richer than the next four richest combined?

I think this is getting a little out of control.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (17 children)

He makes about $150,000,000 a day, passively from his assets.

Wealth tax now.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 9 hours ago

Fucking nauseating

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

The one percenters of the one percenters just got one percented.

(Actually it’s even worse than that I think.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s ridiculous that they could give away $1bn/yr in charity projects and they’d still be billionaires when they’ll finally die

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jackusflackus@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (6 children)

All billionaires should be stripped of their wealth over 999 million and given to the rest of the world

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 day ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

$999m is still an obscene amount of money, and they'd just start finding ways to amass it again

[–] Dumhuvud@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

999M USD is still way too much wealth for a single person.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

I love how Musks conpanies keep losing money yet somehow the stupid fake value just keeps growing.

I hate speculative capitalism so much

[–] AnchoriteMagus@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (9 children)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] sobchak@programming.dev 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's going to continue to accelerate to a kind of feudalism where they own everything. Democracy or even capitalism itself can't survive this.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Capitalism is this. This was always the logical conclusion when wealth and success were so intrinsically linked.

[–] y0kai@anarchist.nexus 13 points 1 day ago

lmao glad someone said it.

here's hoping capitalism doesn't survive this.

[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

It is called capitalism because those with the most capital get to make all the decisions

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Where’s that worthless piece of dickskin Larry Ellison?

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 6 points 1 day ago

Yup. Ben Norton did a good piece on this topic a few days ago.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dj-hd3l4dSo

The graph (iirc about half way through maybe), with his added coloured blocks for the different eras lends some superb clarity to what's going on, the political philosophy shifting phases of accelerated worsening, and how bad it is, as in how much worse it is contrast to the worst time in history...

What we have now, makes the guilded age look like some kind of egalitarian paradi~~ well, maybe not paradise, but more egalitarian... much less egregious than would have been seen in the keynesian phase. How little they knew, of how much worse it could get, and was going to get. Pesky marketing, in rebranding same old corporate fascism as "neo-liberalism". Many likely not bothering with the term neo-feudalism, preferring the delusion there's anything "liberal" still going on. As if that limp thing were even enough to do any more than pretence on slowing down the consolidation of wealth and power even if it were what it's best definitions and ideals pronounce.

load more comments
view more: next ›