this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
323 points (99.1% liked)

Canada

12097 readers
493 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 69 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

The list of rollbacks they give is long:

  • Scrapped the carbon tax and rebate
  • Passed the Building Canada Act, which exempts major projects from environmental laws
  • Doubled down on LNG infrastructure, by referring LNG Canada Phase 2 to the Major Projects Office
  • Ended the Greener Homes loan program, which provided homeowners with up to $40,000 in zero-interest financing for green renovations
  • Disproportionately cut funding to Environment and Climate Change Canada
  • Expanded subsidies for carbon capture and storage
  • Axed the 2 billion trees program
  • Promised federal support for a new oilsands pipeline, as well as the expansion of the Trans Mountain pipeline
  • Announced intention to not proceed with the cap on emissions from the oil and gas industry
  • Weakened the Clean Electricity Regulations by suspending their application in Alberta
  • Promised new subsidies for fossil fuel infrastructure (pipelines, CCS & enhanced oil recovery)
  • Threatened to amend or suspend the Oil Tanker Moratorium Act
  • Weakened greenwashing provisions in the Competition Act
  • Weakened methane regulations, by delaying Alberta’s deadline for achieving the targets
  • Doubled down on fossil fuels, by referring Ksi Lisims LNG, and the enabling North Coast Transmission Line, to the Major Projects Office
  • Suspended a ban on the export of single-use plastic items that are prohibited in Canada
  • Scrapped the Electric Vehicle Availability Standard, which would have required all new vehicles sold in Canada to be zero-emissions by 2035.
  • Cut $5 billion for the Canada Public Transit Fund (CPTF)
  • Updated the mandate for the Canada Infrastructure Bank to make way for fossil fuel financing
  • Promised $1 billion for Equinor’s proposed Bay du Nord Offshore Oil Project
  • Ended the Clean Growth Hub
  • Gave Alberta more powers over impact assessment
  • Paused the fuel excise tax
  • Created new fossil fuel subsidies for more oil and gas production
  • Weakened the Pest Control Products Act
  • Doubled down on fossil fuels, by approving Enbridge’s $4 billion Sunrise natural gas pipeline expansion plan in BC
  • Proposed sweeping changes to major project decision making and approvals, including:
    — creating special economic zones where projects will not need reviews,
    — creating conditions to preapprove pipelines,
    — weakening Species at Risk Act to allow Cabinet to approve projects
    that would threaten the survival or recovery of endangered species
  • Weakened Canada’s Electricity Regulations, which will make more room for fossil gas and make it harder to get a clean, affordable grid
  • Weakened industrial carbon pricing
  • Lowered expectations for CCS Pathways Project
  • Considered using Export Development Canada for public financing for LNG Canada
[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My blood pressure shot through the ceiling reading that list.

The environment is an increasingly bigger economic pressure, but jack shit is done about it because it can't be quantified in an excel sheet.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I agree, the environment should be the topmost issue, and that list of cancelled efforts is incredible. I knew Carney was aiming to stimulate the economy by removing some guidelines but holy shit, this is a lot.

[–] Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

What happened?! Is there any climate policy left? That's a lot of pro-oil policy.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm mad that the ONLY choices available in Canada are bigots and corporate shills.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's not true. We don't live in a two party presidential system, we live in a multiparty parliamentary system.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Without proportional representation we are moving closer to a structurally codified duopoly like the US with every election.

It doesn't matter how our current electoral system is SUPPOSED to work; POSIWID.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

we are moving closer to a structurally codified duopoly

Not true. It just happens that in the last election we got a more duopolistic parliament than usual. There is no general trend however. Here is the list of all parliament makeups since confederation. You would have to go back to the 1958-1962 parliament for a two official party parliament and even then it was just that the CCF only had 8 MPs and so didn't have official party status. To find a parliament with legitimately only 2 parties, you have to go all the way back to the 1918-1921 parliament.

Our system consistently produces 3rd and 4th parties, and operates comfortably in minority governments.

To be 100% clear, I am not making a case against proportional representation. It is absolutely the right way to go. Electoral reform is absolutely essential and we should be thiniking out of the box to deepen and strengthen our democratic institutions, e.g., replacing the unelected senate with either a kind of citizen jury via sortition or straight up the Assembly of First Nations (now that would be something :) ) and definitely a massive increase in the number of MPs, to massively increase the winning coaltion (ratio W/S). There is zero reason why 19th century technological constraints (send a bunch of dudes to sit around in a big room) should define what 21st century mass democracy should look like.

What I'm pushing back against is not electoral reform. I'm pushing back on seeing Canadian politics through a US lens. Liberals especially loooove that lens because it means they get to use the craziness of the Poilievrites to blackmail everyone.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In your life time, have you seen anyone other than an LPC or Conservative Party as Prim toe minister? Because I haven't and I'm 45 years old.

Oh wait you haven't

literally Robert Borden formed the Unionist party because he needed support for Conscription in 1917.

It was a party of both Conservatives and Pro Conscription Liberals.

That was literally more than a century ago.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's a separate question. And the fact that we've had something like 15 minority governments in our history is proof that being PM is not the same as a president and that smaller parties matter. That's literally how the NDP pushed universal healthcare through a Pearson minority and partial dental/pharma through a Trudeau minority.

Again, I'm not arguing in favour of the status quo, quite the opposite, see my response further down the thread. I'm just saying our system has its own structure and its dynamics are different from the American one.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

God I fucking hate the liberals and everything about them.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Sorry. Have to keep supporting the checks notes former Governor of the Bank of England for PM, because a vote for NDP/Greens is a vote for the Conservatives (or whatever bullshit equivalent math is needed to keep the hoes in line).

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Blip6338@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago

I am older and also mad at this shit ahow.

[–] garbagehead@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

The young people seem madder about being unable to have any economic goals.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Sucks. But Canada is under a shitload of economic pressure now with the U.S. fucking us over. It would be great if we could have everything, but sometimes difficult decisions need to be made.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago (11 children)

You realize that from young people point of view, the "hard decision" is "let's just fuck the young ones and embrace collective suicide!"?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Take a load of this guy thinking that climate change doesn't cause economic pressure.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Canada is like someone who's trying to stop smoking, hits a rough patch, and starts smoking even more because they don't know any other way to deal with stress. Doubling down on fossil fuels isn't the only way to deal with this economic pressure.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Exactly so. The entire world is turning to renewables right now and the oil pressure only makes it more urgent and PROFITABLE. Going into this, new solar and wind were already cheaper than fossil fuels for power generation. Yet we're still beholden to the oil companies who own our government.

[–] Vinylraupe@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

I too think thats the reason and not some ill intent. Basically ol' reliable. (that in the long run isnt reliable but fucks the whole planet over but you know what i mean)

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is why we should have gotten out of the US trade relationship ~~yesterday~~ ~~last year~~ ~~a decade ago~~ ~~two decades ago~~ I mean never got involved with them.

All we can do now is get out of it and take the brunt of the economic down turn that comes from allowing it to reach this point.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Yea, so I guess one of the changes allowing for companies to bypass evironmental reviews, which will do a lot to help US based energy companies, pisses you off, then? Or any of the other things being done that benefit US companies at our expense?

Be serious, he’s selling us out and we’re getting fuck-all in return.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I think young people understand that the “ruling class” is going to have to be overthrown by any means necessary

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

LPC is staying strong in the polls. I'm surprised. Maybe the press has been exaggerating the backlash? In the UK the lack of approval for Starmer is reflected in the news as well as the polls.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_46th_Canadian_federal_election

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

They are? I thought they lost faith on climate change goals a long time ago.

[–] JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone 5 points 1 week ago

"Government makes bad decision: affected constituents respond that they will be negatively impacted by said bad decision"

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Carney has been sailing the popularity wave for far too long.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He’s building a fucking landing strip in downtown Toronto that’s one way to lose a future election! His majority is SLIM.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

most countries have abandoned climate goals for years already.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›